If you can bet live, pound GSW

NBAStats · 03-11-10, 11:23 PM

The Warriors will win the second quarter. If either Ellis or Roy has 4 fouls going into the break, hit GSW again at halftime.

suicidekings · 03-11-10, 11:36 PM

This game will be back and forth. too early to pick a winner...

NBAStats · 03-11-10, 11:48 PM

I was suggesting to pound GS after the 1st quarter for value due to the foul situation. It was a great spot with Ellis (who kills GS) and Roy being on the bench. A reevaluation would be in order at half, but so far so very good.

NBAStats · 03-11-10, 11:58 PM

If you bet GSW at the end of the 1st quarter, you got +5. I would now suggest betting Portland -5 for the second half. That only gives you a small middle, but I'm not betting it for a middle. I'm betting it because Roy stayed out of foul trouble (had 2 at end of 1st q, still has 2) and unfortunately for Golden St Ellis didn't pick up anymore fouls and will be in there to kill them in the 2nd half. Curry is also teetering now with 3 fouls.

rake922 · 03-12-10, 12:00 AM

GSW will probably win the game though

kingofgamble · 03-12-10, 12:01 AM

port take over 2H

chrisharvard01 · 03-12-10, 12:03 AM

I wanted GOLDEN ST but I didn't do s_hit about it, already was on UND 216 (-130).

Man, i'm f_ucked now.

OVER 215 is a

wolverines · 03-12-10, 12:05 AM

GSW came to play

NBAStats · 03-12-10, 12:07 AM

Originally posted by wolverines

GSW came to play

They came to play as soon as Roy and Ellis hit the pine. Roy has the best net +/- for the Blazers and Ellis has by far the worst net +/- in the ENTIRE NBA.

GSW are 9-2 ATS when he is out, and true to form they played better in the 2nd quarter with him on the pine. And played especially well when Roy was on the pine.

suicidekings · 03-12-10, 12:11 AM

Originally posted by NBAStats

If you bet GSW at the end of the 1st quarter, you got +5. I would now suggest betting Portland -5 for the second half. That only gives you a small middle, but I'm not betting it for a middle. I'm betting it because Roy stayed out of foul trouble (had 2 at end of 1st q, still has 2) and unfortunately for Golden St Ellis didn't pick up anymore fouls and will be in there to kill them in the 2nd half. Curry is also teetering now with 3 fouls.

I think there will probably be multiple lead changes in the 2H. Better to just take the POR ML live which is effectively -3 rather than -5.

NBAStats · 03-12-10, 12:12 AM

-5 for the 2nd half (which i was talking about) is effectively -3 for the game.

dannynoo · 03-12-10, 12:26 AM

I put a few units on GSW +5 2nd half.

suicidekings · 03-12-10, 12:27 AM

Originally posted by NBAStats

-5 for the 2nd half (which i was talking about) is effectively -3 for the game.

A POR ML (winning by one) would have been equivalent to POR 2H -3. And would be available at plus money. POR 2H -5 was a TERRIBLE line to bet on.

paco · 03-12-10, 12:29 AM

Brandon Roy might win the game alone for Portland

Mac4Lyfe · 03-12-10, 12:43 AM

Monte Ellis is on fire... 12 points in the quarter. Doing work.

GSW bringing the energy. This is a fun team to watch most nights.

blix177 · 03-12-10, 12:48 AM

Warrior handing me a can of whoopass

NBAStats · 03-12-10, 12:52 AM

Originally posted by suicidekings

A POR ML (winning by one) would have been equivalent to POR 2H -3. And would be available at plus money. POR 2H -5 was a TERRIBLE line to bet on.

At halftime there was no POR ML on the planet at anything close to + money or -108 or anything remotely close.

DarkMage · 03-12-10, 12:57 AM

Warriors

MAESTRO1 · 03-12-10, 01:12 AM

WARRIORS people must be drunk

Time is Money · 03-12-10, 01:17 AM

Warriors are breaking down 4q

Bigcheez · 03-12-10, 01:23 AM

Golden State doing everything wrong in the 4th.

Vincepcion · 03-12-10, 01:24 AM

so sick, you just know that theyre going to miss a 3 and foul to bury my +6

watson is such an idiot

golden state will for sure kill my +6 like they did on my 2nd half over with this pathetic offensive display in the 4th

NBAStats · 03-12-10, 01:26 AM

Or a Luol Deng like cherry pick dunk, like the one he had against Portland to bury the board.

DennisGreen · 03-12-10, 01:30 AM

9 pts in the 4th

I think 15 yr old girls would have scored more than the Warriors in the 4th.

nulldah · 03-12-10, 01:30 AM

i'm glad i take portland live in play ML... now at least, i'm little bit better after fail the under n +4.5, but still, the fifth time n second in a nite lost spread by 0.5

suicidekings · 03-12-10, 01:43 AM

Originally posted by NBAStats

At halftime there was no POR ML on the planet at anything close to + money or -108 or anything remotely close.

Live betting in the first 3Q timeout... GS went into the half strong, so waiting it out was the smart move, even though I thought Portland would take the 2H. Not talking about the crappy 2H ML.

Anyways. Done deal now...

chrisharvard01 · 03-12-10, 02:03 AM

Originally posted by chrisharvard01

I wanted GOLDEN ST but I didn't do s_hit about it, already was on UND 216 (-130).

Man, i'm f_ucked now.

OVER 215 is a

wow, i love eating my own words when making money is involved.

chicken dinner!

gentleman, i know you all loath it but laying -130 or -140 doesn't make you a f_ucking square. I had 5u on this UND and bought a point. Tonight, it makes me a winner.

chrisharvard01 · 03-12-10, 02:12 AM

Suicide kings,
i noticed your best bet was UND 215 for the GOLDEN ST/PORT game.After the game pushed, you changed it to 216.

When I posted b_itching of the game going OVER at half time, I saw that you had UND 215. I noticed because I had bought a point and you had not. After the game, your best bet suddenly says UND 216, not 215 as previously to the outcome.

I just want to tell you, you shouldn't give a s_hit what people here think of you, even if you lose or push.

I know you had 215 originally.

After it pushed, you changed it to 216. Thats pretty lame.

andywend · 03-12-10, 02:17 AM

I also saw that suicide kings listed under 215 for the GSW/PORT game and changed it to under 216 when the score became final at 110-105.

Pretty darn pathetic.

ConnieDotey · 03-12-10, 02:23 AM

Originally posted by andywend

I also saw that suicide kings listed under 215 for the GSW/PORT game and changed it to under 216 when the score became final at 110-105.

Pretty darn pathetic.

Great news

" You get what you desire in life when you demonstrate, sincerely, your readiness to have it."

lakerboy · 03-12-10, 02:24 AM

where did sk do this? not impressive

chrisharvard01 · 03-12-10, 02:28 AM

Originally posted by andywend

I also saw that suicide kings listed under 215 for the GSW/PORT game and changed it to under 216 when the score became final at 110-105.

Pretty darn pathetic.

I'm glad a veteran here at SBR is ready to stand up and fight the rookie p_ussys of this forum.

I used to like this f_ucking guy SUICIDE KINGS.

It's too bad... he seemed like an honest guy.

suicidekings · 03-12-10, 02:33 AM

Where did you see this? Are you referring to post #14128 in LB's thread? Cause if so, you'll notice I edited the original 7:25pm post at 7:37pm for a game that didn't start until 7:45pm. The reason for editing was to increase the wager size from 1.5u to 2.5u. Either way, it was edited before the game started and has not been touched since.

Is that what you were referring to?

chrisharvard01 · 03-12-10, 02:46 AM

No. Your avatar "best bet". The font above your avatar.

Some players use it to display their plays for the day.

Your plays for the day were CHI/ORL U207 and POR/GSW U215.

It would be the same which ever thread you posted. It's like a shadow.

When you EDIT it, it adjusts in each thread.

You had POR/GSW U215.

I saw that s_hit. You had UND 215. When the game pushed you changed it to 216.

ANDY just confirmed you were walking around SBR with an UND 215 tag on your avatar so that is proof enough.

I don't give a s_hit that you pushed.... Good!

I just think it's lame you are touting some winning f_ucking night when in fact, you did not win, you pushed.