Who wants my NBA plays?

**Brocc** · 06-06-10, 05:28 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

I'm thinking the Flyers shock the hockey world tonight. Then Chicago wins at Philly in Game 6.

I agree the Flyers shock the world tonight, but I'll disagree about Game 6.....The Flyers hoist the Cup that night.....Book it.

**t-wizzle** · 06-06-10, 05:47 PM

Damn what happened with the total? That thing really shot up.

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Damn what happened with the total? That thing really shot up.

Given the drop, then the rise, something tells me the total will be close to spot on. It'll be interesting to see what it's doing an hour from now.

I see LAL -6 is now at +100, where it was -107 this morning. Something tells me we'll be at 5.5 by gametime.

**lakerboy** · 06-06-10, 05:51 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Given the drop, then the rise, something tells me the total will be close to spot on. It'll be interesting to see what it's doing an hour from now.

I see LAL -6 is now at +100, where it was -107 this morning. Something tells me we'll be at 5.5 by gametime.

its not going to 5.5.

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 05:52 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

its not going to 5.5.

Even if late money comes in on Boston?

**gohabsgo** · 06-06-10, 05:58 PM

What's the play guys? Find it expensive to play Lakers ML
Looks like a no play so far.

**MidgetTossers** · 06-06-10, 06:04 PM

Originally posted by gohabsgo

What's the play guys? Find it expensive to play Lakers ML
Looks like a no play so far.

i wish i knew what the play was..i see a lot of people here on boston and i just dont get it....just gonna wait and see what lb and paco end up on and then make my decision...like lb hinted to earlier, maybe a 2h play is the way to go here

**lakerboy** · 06-06-10, 06:06 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Even if late money comes in on Boston?

there is no money on boston

the books are leaning that way too make you take them

**t-wizzle** · 06-06-10, 06:10 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

there is no money on boston

the books are leaning that way too make you take them

Expand please

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:10 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

there is no money on boston

the books are leaning that way too make you take them

Why would the books be offering LAL -6 at +100?

**Goat Milk** · 06-06-10, 06:13 PM

The over is the biggest trap

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:14 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

The over is the biggest trap

Didn't you question Dexter taking the under?

**paco** · 06-06-10, 06:15 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

The over is the biggest trap

...

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:18 PM

Originally posted by paco

...

SBR Forum - Sports Betting Talk - Sportsbook Review Forum

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basketball-handicapping/437283-nba-2010-playoffs-p11.html

Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.

**lakerboy** · 06-06-10, 06:20 PM

Originally posted by t-wizzle

Expand please

Originally posted by No coincidences

Why would the books be offering LAL -6 at +100?

The books are trying to make you think Boston is the play because they know lots of folks watch lines. Boston might be the play at +6 but i wouldnt feel too comfortable with that bet. If there was any real sharp money on Boston the line would have dropped to 5.5 like last game but it didnt this time. Sharps have deep pockets and can make the line move regardless of how many joes are betting on LA.

**Goat Milk** · 06-06-10, 06:21 PM

don't make your play based on what i think NC

LB the Sharps will get buried this whole series bro if anyone watches late money or early money in this series they will lose more often then not too. Sharps didn't have a clue for game 1 and once game 4 comes around they won't have a clue either.

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:22 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

don't make your play based on what i think NC

I'm not, trust me -- just noticed you contradicted yourself. You know if I did the same, you'd be on my ass about it.

**PAYTON20** · 06-06-10, 06:24 PM

Sooo what I'm hearing is that the Lakers ML is a solid option?

**chimp** · 06-06-10, 06:24 PM

does this line movement late money bullshit even matter in the playoffs?

**lakerboy** · 06-06-10, 06:24 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

don't make your play based on what i think NC

LB the Sharps will get buried this whole series bro if anyone watches late money or early money in this series they will lose more often then not too. Sharps didn't have a clue for game 1 and once game 4 comes around they won't have a clue either.

sharps cleaned house on the under in game 1.

**Goat Milk** · 06-06-10, 06:24 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

I'm not, trust me -- just noticed you contradicted yourself. You know if I did the same, you'd be on my ass about it.

My man all I told Dexter is that he's playing with fire with that total and I was right because now its at 193 and he took it at 191 under. Threfore, if he listened to my advice, he'd be in a way better position for the under now at 193 because that total is very , very sharp

CK · 06-06-10, 06:26 PM

Tough to call - I'm leaning Lakers 1Q at -2, as Phil always stresses the importance of a strong start at home. Then hopefully just sit back, "relax", and watch the rest of what should be an entertaining game! (or see if LB has any 2H leans at the half :P)

**Goat Milk** · 06-06-10, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

sharps cleaned house on the under in game 1.

Yeah the ones that took it at the right time. Regardless, sharps took Boston plus the points and they burned their money on Boston ML too. And they will do the same come game 4 or 5.

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

My man all I told Dexter is that he's playing with fire with that total and I was right because now its at 193 and he took it at 191 under. Threfore, if he listened to my advice, he'd be in a way better position for the under now at 193 because that total is very , very sharp

We shall see.

**JR007** · 06-06-10, 06:30 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

JR,

Where are you getting these artciles from? This article you just posted is absolute garbage.

Goatie...these guys are professional handicappers...because you do not agree with it does not make the article "garbarge'...same thing can be said about your posts....matchups are jack..this is a team sport...all about adjustments...I do not give opinions...i post articles..to help.....

**Goat Milk** · 06-06-10, 06:32 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

We shall see.

What is there to see? If he listened to me he would have 193 under right now instead of 191, regardless of if the winner is the over under. That total is very sharp you will sweat it out which ever side you are on i think

JR there's a difference between professional handcappers and students of the game. Those guys don't know 1/4 of what I know about basektball. LB's analysis shits on those as well.

Matchups are jack? Yeah....keep thinking that my man while I continue to hit over 60% based on matchup diagnosis. Adjustments are all about knowing the game. These cappers don't know adjustments, they just speculate. They make their plays based on stats and garbage shit.

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:34 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

What is there to see? If he listened to me he would have 193 under right now instead of 191, regardless of if the winner is the over under. That total is very sharp you will sweat it out which ever side you are on i think

I agree you're going to sweat it out, but I don't personally believe the over is a trap because I do think it'll be a close game and we'll see FT's and fouls at the end of a one- or two-possession game that will put it into the 195-200 range.

Just my take. If you're going to go under, I'd go under 1H.

**frostno98** · 06-06-10, 06:37 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

sharps cleaned house on the under in game 1.

**lakerboy** · 06-06-10, 06:37 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

I agree you're going to sweat it out, but I don't personally believe the over is a trap because I do think it'll be a close game and we'll see FT's and fouls at the end of a one- or two-possession game that will put it into the 195-200 range.

Just my take. If you're going to go under, I'd go under 1H.

goat is right though. dex got a horrible #.

**Goat Milk** · 06-06-10, 06:37 PM

Good luck NC I won't be playing the total so I'll cheer for your over.

Good luck LB, Paco and Crew, get it today. I need to go lock up my store for my cousin so I'll be back later I'm just going to let my two parlays ride out at worst I will break even, but I will defienitely make a play once i get back home.

Which ever side your taking, I think you should buy 1-2 points.

**Laker_crazy** · 06-06-10, 06:38 PM

Originally posted by PAYTON20

Sooo what I'm hearing is that the Lakers ML is a solid option?

At such low odds,it would be foolish to throw money.But then again Its your money in the end.Good luck

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:39 PM

Originally posted by lakerboy

goat is right though. dex got a horrible #.

I agree. I honestly didn't see this kind of increase coming, which makes me think Goat is right in that it's a trap. We'll see where it goes in the next few minutes.

I like the over personally, but I'm not in love with it.

**Ace_of_Spades** · 06-06-10, 06:39 PM

Taking the under 192.5

**No coincidences** · 06-06-10, 06:40 PM

Originally posted by Goat Milk

Good luck NC I won't be playing the total so I'll cheer for your over.

Good luck LB, Paco and Crew, get it today. I need to go lock up my store for my cousin so I'll be back later I'm just going to let my two parlays ride out at worst I will break even, but I will defienitely make a play once i get back home.

Which ever side your taking, I think you should buy 1-2 points.

BOL to you too, GM. I do think your parlay's in good shape.

**longbeachson** · 06-06-10, 06:41 PM

if laker wins they prolly cover as well