T-Wizz 2014 NBA Playoffs

[leetreaper]

there's always a better team in a series. I haven't decided who I'd back in game 4 yet but I don't think you should chase through the reasoning that spurs is the better team...

That simplistic method gonna bury you brother. It didn't serve you well game 3. Consider it a bit more man. Being the better team here is not the only factor deciding who wins nor the most important factor

Guy is clueless, can't you tell....??? GL tonight

[crustyme]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/2870833-atlanta-hawks-absolute-must-play-max-game-6-a-p2.html#post21756119

total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loserPacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
Spurs +2.5 -107 (8x) loser
ML +125 (3x) loser
Spurs to win Series 4-0 +900 (.5x) loser


0-39 -170 psi

lol

this dumbfuk is setting records for the most air units lost in nba playoffs and we've still got a month to go.

lol

keep up the great work, dumbfuk

golden goose of fade.

[leetreaper]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...l#post21756119
total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loserPacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
Spurs +2.5 -107 (8x) loser
ML +125 (3x) loser
Spurs to win Series 4-0 +900 (.5x) loser


0-39 -170 psi

lol

this dumbfuk is setting records for the most air units lost in nba playoffs and we've still got a month to go.

lol

keep up the great work, dumbfuk

golden goose of fade.

[WalkingLuckCharm]

Guy is clueless, can't you tell....??? GL tonight

Doesn't really matter to me. I find insulting people posting picks a waste of time and a distasteful action tbh. Don't know why you guys bother so much. Sure he might not meet your expectations but why don't you try help him rather than just pay him out? We all share the same enemy.

that being said though twizz, your bank roll management or unit sizing strategy is one of the weakest I've seen, might wanna plug that leak. I don't really understand why you'd put 8 units on the spread and 3 units on the ML. The spread is pretty much a ML line and you'll find you'll lose out in the long run if you split them like that

[Allure]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-ta...l#post21756119
total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loserPacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
Spurs +2.5 -107 (8x) loser
ML +125 (3x) loser
Spurs to win Series 4-0 +900 (.5x) loser


0-39 -170 psi

lol

this dumbfuk is setting records for the most air units lost in nba playoffs and we've still got a month to go.

lol

keep up the great work, dumbfuk

golden goose of fade.

[BigDofBA]

I don't have a problem with people thinking the Spurs are a better overall team because I thought the Clippers were a better overall team.

With that said, OKC has the two best players on the court and with Ibaka back, they have enough star power to win any game, especially at home.

I wouldn't chase the road team in this series especially when they have lost 8 straight at the venue they're playing at.

Playing the Spurs in game 5 would be a better bet IMO.

This series goes 6 or 7. OKC really just needs Durant or Westbrook to go off once in San Antonio and they can win this series.

With that said, Spurs are still in control up 2-1 with home court.

[WalkingLuckCharm]

Think it depends on ibakas status. No doubt he will be a factor in game 4 but the books have pretty much written off his status for a full series

[t-wizzle]

BigD is on record with okc in this series. I am sticking by Spurs in a short series.

[BigDofBA]

BigD is on record with okc in this series. I am sticking by Spurs in a short series.

Yeah. I said OKC in 7. You said Spurs in 4 or 5.

Didn't feel as good after watching OKC get blown out in the first two games without Ibaka but I'm not changing my prediction.

Pretty sure it will be 2-2 heading back to San Antonio for game 5 which about what I expected anyway.

[Tommy Karate]

Yeah. I said OKC in 7. You said Spurs in 4 or 5.

Didn't feel as good after watching OKC get blown out in the first two games without Ibaka but I'm not changing my prediction.

Pretty sure it will be 2-2 heading back to San Antonio for game 5 which about what I expected anyway.

hammering OKC game 4?

[t-wizzle]

hammering OKC game 4?

He won't. He just talks on a gambling forum like he makes bets but he doesn't really.

[t-wizzle]

Pacers +6 -103 (4x); ML +245 (1x)

[crustyme]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/players-talk/2870833-atlanta-hawks-absolute-must-play-max-game-6-a-p2.html#post21756119

total = 63x loser


Clippers -5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers 1H -3 -105 (2x) loser
Trail Blazers ML +102 (5x) loser
Adding Blazers -1 +100 (2x) loser
Blazers Live +6 -110 (3x) loser;
ML +240 (1x) loser
Clippers -4.5 -105 (4x) loser
Nets +8 -105 (4x) loser;
ML +315 (.5x) loser
Nets 1H +4.5 -105 (2x) loser;
ML +225 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -117 (3x) loser;
ML +255 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (4x) loser
Trail Blazers +7 -107 (4x) loser;
ML +275 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers 1H +4 -110 (2x) loser;
ML +185 (.5x) loser
Trail Blazers Series Price +350 (2x) loser
Blazers +6.5 -105 (4x) loser
ML +260 (1x) loser
Also adding 2x to Blazers 1H +4 -110 loser
.5x to Blazers 1H ML +185 loser
Blazers 2H -3.5 -109 (4x) loser
Clippers +5.5 -108 (12x); loser
ML +205 (2x) loser
Pacers -4 -107 (3x) loser
Thunder -5.5 -103 (4x) loser
Bradley Beal Under 17.5 pts -130 (.5x) loser
Thunder 1H +3 -105 (2.5x) loser
ML +160 (.5x) loserPacers +2.5 -105 (3x) loser
Pacers Live +2.5 +100 (1x) loser
Spurs +2.5 -107 (8x) loser
ML +125 (3x) loser
Spurs to win Series 4-0 +900 (.5x) loser
Pacers +6 -103 (4x) loser
ML +245 (1x) loser

0-41 -175.12 psi

lol

can't make this shit up.

golden goose of fade

lol

[leetreaper]

[Allure]

He won't. He just talks on a gambling forum like he makes bets but he doesn't really.

[leetreaper]

Where are the fades loser?

[BigDofBA]

He won't. He just talks on a gambling forum like he makes bets but he doesn't really.

Had two units on game three and will put three on game 4.

It's not like I bet large amounts of money nor have I ever claimed I do. A few hundo isn't much to boast about.

I don't really care what people think I bet or don't bet. I'm not here trying to impress guys that I don't even know. Think what you want.

I'm only a small timer here in SBR land with all of these high rollers apparently.

And no, I'm not hammering OKC. I never "hammer" a bet. It's not worth it. Hammering bets is a loser's strategy.

Anything can and does happen.

[europe_baller]

Had two units on game three and will put three on game 4.

It's not like I bet large amounts of money nor have I ever claimed I do. A few hundo isn't much to boast about.

I don't really care what people think I bet or don't bet. I'm not here trying to impress guys that I don't even know. Think what you want.

I'm only a small timer here in SBR land with all of these high rollers apparently.

And no, I'm not hammering OKC. I never "hammer" a bet. It's not worth it. Hammering bets is a loser's strategy.

Anything can and does happen.

I like your posts and reasoning and explanations as well regardless if i agree with your opinion or not.. For me few hundreds is a big bet since i dont put houses on bets like everybody here lol... Even though i thought spurs winning this series and everything, i said neither okc or heat winning more than 2 games against spurs. I think spurs have better chance than okc to beat heat thats why i would like spurs..It will be tough...who ever wins tonight i think will be in control of the series...

[BigDofBA]

I like your posts and reasoning and explanations as well regardless if i agree with your opinion or not.. For me few hundreds is a big bet since i dont put houses on bets like everybody here lol... Even though i thought spurs winning this series and everything, i said neither okc or heat winning more than 2 games against spurs. I think spurs have better chance than okc to beat heat thats why i would like spurs..It will be tough...who ever wins tonight i think will be in control of the series...

The Spurs do have a better shot against Miami. If they beat OKC I will back them.

[t-wizzle]

Spurs ML +135 (4x) - Took this yesterday
Spurs ML +130 (14x) - Added today

So 18x total. I said I would take Spurs again in Game 4. Tonight is the crucial game of this series.

[Pauulzcappin]

I have to be completely honest with you wiz, I really like the spurs but as much as you have been cold in the playoffs, I'm kinda scared.

[t-wizzle]

I have to be completely honest with you wiz, I really like the spurs but as much as you have been cold in the playoffs, I'm kinda scared.

That's okay Paul. Nothing wrong with that. Let's nail this one though.

[t-wizzle]

Spurs ML +135 (4x) - Took this yesterday
Spurs ML +130 (14x) - Added today

So 18x total. I said I would take Spurs again in Game 4. Tonight is the crucial game of this series.

Spurs 1H ML +125 (2x)

[crustyme]

Spurs ML +135 (4x) - Took this yesterday
Spurs ML +130 (14x) - Added today
Spurs 1H ML +125 (2x)

So 18x total. I said I would take Spurs again in Game 4. Tonight is the crucial game of this series.

that's a lot of air.

enough to fill up a bouncy taj mahal.

[BigDofBA]

This is a crucial game. If OKC loses, Spurs probably wrap it up in five.

If OKC wins, they might win game 5 too because all the pressure will be on the Spurs.

[KRIT]

Spurs ML +135 (4x) - Took this yesterday
Spurs ML +130 (14x) - Added today

So 18x total. I said I would take Spurs again in Game 4. Tonight is the crucial game of this series.

Have no idea how you can feel that comfortable going 18x on SA with their recent history against Thunder in OKC with Ibaka. Gl, likely going to be on OKC.

This is a crucial game. If OKC loses, Spurs probably wrap it up in five.

If OKC wins, they might win game 5 too because all the pressure will be on the Spurs.

Completely agree with you. If OKC wins tonight, pressure will be on Spurs. Thoughts of 2012 will creep into their heads.

[leetreaper]

omg tuuuuuuuuuuuuuu

[BigDofBA]

Have no idea how you can feel that comfortable going 18x on SA with their recent history against Thunder in OKC with Ibaka. Gl, likely going to be on OKC.



Completely agree with you. If OKC wins tonight, pressure will be on Spurs. Thoughts of 2012 will creep into their heads.

In my mind a game 5 would be easier for OKC to win than a game 7 because if it's 2-2, OKC has momentum and the Spurs are almost in a must win situation knowing that haven't won in OKC in a long time.

OKC has beaten the Spurs 8 straight in OKC and 9 straight when Ibaka has played. This includes 5 playoff games over the past few years.

San Antonio is really good and capable of winning but I really don't see the angle to keep betting more on them each time after they lose in OKC.

[Lovegamblin]

Okc wins 4-2

[KRIT]

In my mind a game 5 would be easier for OKC to win than a game 7 because if it's 2-2, OKC has momentum and the Spurs are almost in a must win situation knowing that haven't won in OKC in a long time.

I think the smart thing to do would be to back the home team every game.

OKC has beaten the Spurs 8 straight in OKC and 9 straight when Ibaka has played. This includes 5 playoff games over the past few years.

San Antonio is really good and capable of winning but I really don't see the angle to keep betting more on them each time after they lose in OKC.

I agree with most everything you said. Ibaka is huge obviously, but getting rid of Sefelosha has been a huge boost to OKC. I like the starting backcourt of Jackson/Westbrook, and I love what Lamb brings off the bench. This is an entirely different OKC team from the first two games. It's a shame Brooks didn't make the lineup tweaks after gm1.

[leetreaper]

In my mind a game 5 would be easier for OKC to win than a game 7 because if it's 2-2, OKC has momentum and the Spurs are almost in a must win situation knowing that haven't won in OKC in a long time.

OKC has beaten the Spurs 8 straight in OKC and 9 straight when Ibaka has played. This includes 5 playoff games over the past few years.

San Antonio is really good and capable of winning but I really don't see the angle to keep betting more on them each time after they lose in OKC.

We just need this one and series over, OKC wins game 5 on the road !!!

[BigDofBA]

I agree with most everything you said. Ibaka is huge obviously, but getting rid of Sefelosha has been a huge boost to OKC. I like the starting backcourt of Jackson/Westbrook, and I love what Lamb brings off the bench. This is an entirely different OKC team from the first two games. It's a shame Brooks didn't make the lineup tweaks after gm1.

The Spurs will make adjustments and play better.

I think it will be a good game. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if OKC won and the Spurs covered.

I just think OKC wins. Until the Spurs beat them in OKC I really have no reason to think they will.

[europe_baller]

The Spurs will make adjustments and play better.

I think it will be a good game. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if OKC won and the Spurs covered.

I just think OKC wins. Until the Spurs beat them in OKC I really have no reason to think they will.

i know but how many times dallas lost to spurs and they gave them hell first round.... i know its hard to beat someone that many times but...tough tough and close game..

[Pauulzcappin]

Line is at 2 now

[GT21Megatron]

Have no idea how you can feel that comfortable going 18x on SA with their recent history against Thunder in OKC with Ibaka. Gl, likely going to be on OKC.



Completely agree with you. If OKC wins tonight, pressure will be on Spurs. Thoughts of 2012 will creep into their heads.

Chasing his complete turds he's been throwing out for the past two months