Over/under predictions

[Crawfishxboy]

Next to surity is going to cash

[Psycho792]

Next to surity is going to cash

nope. 1-2 there

[alamo]

2W - 3L on the night with a miraculous push on the Knicks game. No idea how that stayed at 194 esp when game went to OT. Will take it though!

[humbleyouth]

nope. 1-2 there

Lost the other two game by a combine of 7 point. Could have gone either but i lost.

[humbleyouth]

Nba predictions 13.01.2014


games before 9:00pm
raptors vs bucks over 188
celtics vs rockets over 205.5
knicks vs suns under 194----PUSH
bulls vs wizards over 182
pelicans vs spurs over 198.5
mavericks vs magic over 198.5




next to surity game (s)
raptors vs bucks over 188
pelicans vs spurs over 198.5
mavericks vs magic over 198.5

I went 2-3-1, while i lost a few games they were close.

RECORD FOR POSTINGS ON HERE: 38-27-2.
NEXT TO SURITY GAME IS: 11-7-1

[humbleyouth]

Nba predictions 14.01.2014


record for postings on here: 38-27-2.
Next to surity game is: 11-7-1
lastnight record: 2-3-1


games before 9:00pm
bobcats vs knicks over 188
pacers vs kings over 195
grizzlies vs thunder over 195


next to surety game (s)
pacers vs kings over 195

[JAnthony]

Nba predictions 14.01.2014


record for postings on here: 38-27-2.
Next to surity game is: 11-7-1
lastnight record: 2-3-1


games before 9:00pm
bobcats vs knicks over 188
pacers vs kings over 195
grizzlies vs thunder over 195


next to surety game (s)
pacers vs kings over 195

Those are some rough lines you got there.

[drunkencow]

Nba predictions 14.01.2014


record for postings on here: 38-27-2.
Next to surity game is: 11-7-1
lastnight record: 2-3-1


games before 9:00pm
bobcats vs knicks over 188
pacers vs kings over 195
grizzlies vs thunder over 195


next to surety game (s)
pacers vs kings over 195

Why over on the pacers kings? Doesn't make sense seeing as how pacers have been doing fantastic defensively and the kings are dead last

[RollinDo]

Why over on the pacers kings? Doesn't make sense seeing as how pacers have been doing fantastic defensively and the kings are dead last

That one has me stumped too. I'll be playing the Under for sure tonight.
Pacers do not score 100 much and if they win by 5 or more, the Under should hit.
I'll wait until movement up stops though.

Since Dec. 8th a Pacers total has only gone above 195 two times. I'll take my chances.

[humbleyouth]

Why over on the pacers kings? Doesn't make sense seeing as how pacers have been doing fantastic defensively and the kings are dead last

I see you're new here. Welcome. Goodluck to you later. It might not make sense to you but it does to me.

[alamo]

I see you're new here. Welcome. Goodluck to you later. It might not make sense to you but it does to me.

Cheers dude. Why does it makes sense to you ? Interested in your reasoning on this...

[RollinDo]

Cheers dude. Why does it makes sense to you ? Interested in your reasoning on this...

Yes, please elaborate if you have time. Thanks!

[humbleyouth]

Yes, please elaborate if you have time. Thanks!

I owe no one an explanation. Its all FREE info. No one forces you to play them.

[RollinDo]

I owe no one an explanation. Its all FREE info. No one forces you to play them.

Fine dude. May wanna think of a name change though.
Just asking - you and me are both on this board, but if someone asked for my rationale, not gonna turn them down. It's not like we're pros here.

Thanks anyways for your hard work.

[Noleafclover]

I honestly think some of these accounts are put up here by affiliates, make solid picks until they get a following, then bad ones. I said earlier I'd seen a lot of threads like this not turn out well, and as the followers come, the picks start to fail. Again, hope I'm wrong for the faithful. GL.

[RollinDo]

I honestly think some of these accounts are put up here by affiliates, make solid picks until they get a following, then bad ones. I said earlier I'd seen a lot of threads like this not turn out well, and as the followers come, the picks start to fail. Again, hope I'm wrong for the faithful. GL.

Seen it too in just a short time reading these posts.
I like to determine beforehand which plays I like and if they line up, then I tail. Otherwise, you regret the play if it loses.

[bihon]

I owe no one an explanation. Its all FREE info. No one forces you to play them.

Right, don't question the guru. You either play the games exactly as posted or f.ck off from this thread.
Otherwise you'll be stoned.

[RollinDo]

Right, don't question the guru. You either play the games exactly as posted or f.ck off from this thread.
Otherwise you'll be stoned.

Guru???
What I don't like is someone thinking they're all that because they hit some Under plays for a week and then fell off from his throne three straight days. Just bein real here.
Nobody should be treated with any more royalty than anyone else on here just because of a slightly better record.

I know a posters who are hitting everything now and gladly share their reasoning. To each his own.

Thought we were all trying to help each other out here.

[Milanboy]

That one has me stumped too. I'll be playing the Under for sure tonight.
Pacers do not score 100 much and if they win by 5 or more, the Under should hit.
I'll wait until movement up stops though.

Since Dec. 8th a Pacers total has only gone above 195 two times. I'll take my chances.

maybe look at how many times the kings have gone over that number since Dec. 8. 15 above 2 below.

[humbleyouth]

I honestly think some of these accounts are put up here by affiliates, make solid picks until they get a following, then bad ones. I said earlier I'd seen a lot of threads like this not turn out well, and as the followers come, the picks start to fail. Again, hope I'm wrong for the faithful. GL.

From day one, you had nothing but negatives to contribute. Look at all of the posts you made here.

[humbleyouth]

maybe look at how many times the kings have gone over that number since Dec. 8. 15 above 2 below.

Leave them alone and let them talk.

I refused to answer b/c the dude just joined the forum today and all of a sudden he's questioning picks. Did he looked at my previous posts? Isn't my picks about how i see the games?

[oiler]

its not like your a long time member either.seem the newbies need to learn manners

[RollinDo]

Leave them alone and let them talk.

I refused to answer b/c the dude just joined the forum today and all of a sudden he's questioning picks. Did he looked at my previous posts? Isn't my picks about how i see the games?

Thanks for clarifying humble...but really - he just wanted to know why - no harm done.

[Noleafclover]

From day one, you had nothing but negatives to contribute. Look at all of the posts you made here.

Believe I've posted twice whether there were over/under (high foul/low foul) refs on games, not sure if those were for or against your picks (I recall 1 being against, it's possible the other was as well) but I don't see how adding information is negative.

Twice now I have voiced skepticism, based off what I've seen in the past. The quoted post notes the same trend that makes me suspicious of affiliates beginning here. It's an observation, it does happen to be negative, but if the facts fit...

Both times I said I hope I'm wrong for the tired masses' sake.

[humbleyouth]

its not like your a long time member either.seem the newbies need to learn manners

I'm a newbie and you following my posts? If you don't know how something started. Don't speak about it. Give Thanks.

[alamo]

Leave them alone and let them talk.

I refused to answer b/c the dude just joined the forum today and all of a sudden he's questioning picks. Did he looked at my previous posts? Isn't my picks about how i see the games?

Jeez dude, All i asked was why you liked the Kings under and was interested as to your reasoning

[ncurrie33]

Nba predictions 14.01.2014


record for postings on here: 38-27-2.
Next to surity game is: 11-7-1
lastnight record: 2-3-1


games before 9:00pm
bobcats vs knicks over 188
pacers vs kings over 195
grizzlies vs thunder over 195


next to surety game (s)
pacers vs kings over 195

Lets go 3-0 tonight humble! You can do it again!

[m9hrdad]

I love the knicks/bobcats game going over. Knicks are playing well, Chandler is coming back tonight, and the Bobcats have also got some good scorers in Kemba, Al and GH.

BOL guys!

[Crawfishxboy]

Yeah!!!! Lets get this movement restarted!!! F the nay sayers!!!!

[killacappapilla]

Lets do this

[YTC]

Indy is scoring alot against SAC, over for sure. BTW, I appreciate humbleyouth's picks. I do my own analysis of O/U using statistics such as ppg, oppg, pace factor, turnover/assist and such (a lot of others too). Then I take a look at humble's and if the end results match up, I bet on it. And it has to be a game where my analysis is higher confidence in the result.

Today I predicted 202.9 for SAC@IND, which is over the vegas lines by a lot (hence my own confidence). Compounded with humbleyouth's "over" prediction, cashing it in later.

humbleyouth gets asked a lot and sometimes in a negative tone. Give him some space to breath for posting his picks. Also, if you are asking for why humble thought IND would go "over", my opinion is that this information is personal. Surely you can understand why our formula's (whether they work or not) are personal. It took hard work to decide on which factors to use, what weight to give them and such.

I used to bet over/under based on "gut feel". IND played yesterday, IND doesn't score a lot, IND has the best defense, hence this game is going under. Vegas moves the lines lower than it should be because they have bettors like me. I recommend to serious people to put more importance in the numbers rather than gut feel. Even if IND does score lower and has good defense, calculate it out, formulate and evolve a mathematical base if you have 30 minutes a day.

[comon kryptonite]

thanks from this rookie

im a rookie regarding the nba and will admit dont know shit about the line but have been doing well thanks to humbles picks... i have actually done better by hitting his picks as a teaser!!i hit my last two plays which consisted of the overs...just wanted to say thanks and keep the suggestions coming..

[Crawfishxboy]

Made a profit today. Thanks humble

[Time is Money]

im a rookie regarding the nba and will admit dont know shit about the line but have been doing well thanks to humbles picks... i have actually done better by hitting his picks as a teaser!!i hit my last two plays which consisted of the overs...just wanted to say thanks and keep the suggestions coming..

teasing totals is a complete sucker bet. I don't even like teasing spreads but I do occasionally, nba totals? never.

[Noleafclover]

I used to bet over/under based on "gut feel". IND played yesterday, IND doesn't score a lot, IND has the best defense, hence this game is going under.

From my observations, tired teams slack on defense more than offense. Hope this helps. Of course, it's just one factor, yada yada.