unlike the Lakers.. The Heat do not b•tch about injuries..
Collapse
X
-
MensesSBR MVP
- 03-15-13
- 2755
#36Comment -
RatzzSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-07-10
- 8965
#38Riff. Lakers are obsolete.
After this season. they are going to be the Dallas Cowboys of the last decade.
accept it. it's over.
Stern protected you, is still doing so, but Kobe's record chasing "me or nothing" style has turned off all
possible big name players that could have been brought in to help. Nash was grasping at straws when he okay'd trade..
Howard is leaving, anybody with half a brain can read his eyes. He's already gone./
what a stroke of genius for the Suns GM..
he SMOKED KUPCHAK SO BADLY.. saved a wad of dough and got 4 great picks for
what is basically a broken down moped.
tell Kupchapk never to play poker in Phoenix again.. you can bluff this guy with a pair of threes
Comment -
riffraff24SBR Hall of Famer
- 04-20-11
- 7234
#39So obsolete that you post about them 20 times a day? PsychopathComment -
riffraff24SBR Hall of Famer
- 04-20-11
- 7234
#40btw - i never read your essays bro. I only read a few words here and there so you are wasting your time.Comment -
upscopeSBR MVP
- 04-26-11
- 2837
#42Let me ask u a question Rat boy. What possible big names players were turned off?? Do you even have a clue that the Lakers have been maxed out cap wise since the '07 season?? You can't bring in big name players when you're paying 3 guys (Kobe, Pau, Bynum) 16+m/per. For this reason the Lakers have been forced to bring in mid level guys (Blake, Artest) because that's all the cap would allow. They've had to trade for the big names (Howard, Pau, Nash). Please show me or remind me all these big names that according to u don't want to play for the Lakers??
It's stupid sh#it like this that causes u to lose credibility. Pulling sh#t out of your azz out of pure hatred. Just reaching & trowing darts & further illustrating a complete lack of knowledge & fundamental understanding how the game actually works.
U say the Lakers are chasing all big name players but they r turned off. I don't recall the Lakers chasing one big name player via free agency, please refresh my memory.Comment -
RatzzSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-07-10
- 8965
#431) Dwight Howard (did not want to come after speaking with Kobe directly)
in fact, ORL GM threatened to trade him to the Lakwers last year, if he did not extend 1 yr.
so he reupped to avoid Lakers, and was traded here anyway.. which totally fukked his image.
He is leaving next year. He hates playing in LA. (Lakers) he's gone.
2) Chris Paul: he let it be publicly known that he was delighted that the trade to Lakers to fell thru..
CP3 is another player that cannot stand Kobe on a personal level. He always sticks it to him directly when they play.
Always makes it a point to make him look terrible on D, especially with last shot before end of Qtrs/Halves.
3) Ramon Sessions: not a big name by any stretch, but failing to persuade him- ultimately cost the Lakers 4 great picks,
and $27M (who knows how much with LUX tax) Ramon was not interested in playing with Kobe, and that mental/psychological
environment. He left to accept less money in Charlotte, vibe was so bad, he split to play nowhere, for less.
4) Has-Beens & Nobodies: the only people that are willing to come and play alongside, (wrong word, really) UNDER Kobe's thumb..
are has-beens and nobodies. Because they recognize it will not be any fun, and playing there will kill their career stats.*
Comment -
upscopeSBR MVP
- 04-26-11
- 2837
#441) Dwight Howard (did not want to come after speaking with Kobe directly)
in fact, ORL GM threatened to trade him to the Lakwers last year, if he did not extend 1 yr.
so he reupped to avoid Lakers, and was traded here anyway.. which totally fukked his image.
He is leaving next year. He hates playing in LA. (Lakers) he's gone.
2) Chris Paul: he let it be publicly known that he was delighted that the trade to Lakers to fell thru..
CP3 is another player that cannot stand Kobe on a personal level. He always sticks it to him directly when they play.
Always makes it a point to make him look terrible on D, especially with last shot before end of Qtrs/Halves.
3) Ramon Sessions: not a big name by any stretch, but failing to persuade him- ultimately cost the Lakers 4 great picks,
and $27M (who knows how much with LUX tax) Ramon was not interested in playing with Kobe, and that mental/psychological
environment. He left to accept less money in Charlotte, vibe was so bad, he split to play nowhere, for less.
4) Has-Beens & Nobodies: the only people that are willing to come and play alongside, (wrong word, really) UNDER Kobe's thumb..
are has-beens and nobodies. Because they recognize it will not be any fun, and playing there will kill their career stats.*
Dwight had a no trade clause, he waived it to come to LA. in fact he went on record saying Brooklyn & LA r the only destinations he would choose. Once Lopez was looked down it was all LA.
Paul trade was official. he too made it clear LA was his #1 destination. Then we all know what happened with the veto. You're bringing UP last second shots to quarters as proof that paul didn't want to play for LA....that is fukkin hilarious
Sessions couldnt get the job done last yr. he wasn't asked back once it was clear Nash was coming. The Lakers choose Nash over Sessions.
Has beens.....Thanx for making my point. When you r capped out all u have to choose from is has beens & mid level guys. That's the way it works.
This is what you r calling big names?? The only big names on this list r Howard & Paul. Howard waived his no trade clause to come to LA & Paul got vetoed out. U r so fukkin weak words can't describe. Keep throwing darts pal & embarrassing yourself even further. You r blinded by hatred & in the process have turned yourself into a laughingstock w/ theories & inaccuracies. Reach a little more & come UP w/ some real "big names" that actually did shun the Lakers when they went after them via free agency.Comment -
jsmithj88SBR MVP
- 12-27-08
- 3591
#45i am 95% sure howard didnt have a no-trade clause
howard NEVER wanted to come to the lakers and only did so because they were the only suitors left
chris paul i think wanted to go to the lakers, but seems to happy where hes at now
it is true, u cant get big agent signings if ur capped out, and the lakers are always capped out
last one i can remember is shaq??Comment -
RatzzSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-07-10
- 8965
#46Wow....that's what u have.
Dwight had a no trade clause, he waived it to come to LA.*
2) Paul trade was official. he too made it clear LA was his #1 destination. *L.A. C-L-I-P-P-E-R-S
Sessions couldnt get the job done last yr. he wasn't asked back once it was clear Nash was coming. The Lakers choose Nash over Sessions.
Has beens.....Thanx for making my point. When you r capped out all u have to choose from is has beens & mid level guys. That's the way it works.*
1)*Dwight Howard Wants To Play for Brooklyn Nets
read this from*Laker Nation
after speaking with Kobe and being informed he was the no.3 option , he did not want to come.
and after playing under Kobe for a season, definitely will not stay
2)*YOU ARE RIGHT––Los Angeles*was his No.1 Destination.*L.A. * C-L-I-P-P-E-R-S
read this from LA Times;
Chris Paul apparently feels no ill will toward NBA commissioner David Stern for kaboshing a trade last year that would have sent the All-Star point guard to the Lakers.
3)*Sessions opted out of his contract with the Lakers to sign with the Bobcats.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8161833/agent-charlotte-bobcats-agree-ramon-sessions-two-year-deal
Comment -
ezdeals18SBR Rookie
- 03-31-13
- 11
#47the heats are the worst whinners.Comment -
upscopeSBR MVP
- 04-26-11
- 2837
#48WRONG THREE TIMES. how the Laker fans delude yourselves. yikes
1)*Dwight Howard Wants To Play for Brooklyn Nets
read this from*Laker Nation
after speaking with Kobe and being informed he was the no.3 option , he did not want to come.
and after playing under Kobe for a season, definitely will not stay
2)*YOU ARE RIGHT––Los Angeles*was his No.1 Destination.*L.A. * C-L-I-P-P-E-R-S
read this from LA Times;
Chris Paul apparently feels no ill will toward NBA commissioner David Stern for kaboshing a trade last year that would have sent the All-Star point guard to the Lakers.
3)*Sessions opted out of his contract with the Lakers to sign with the Bobcats.
http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8161833/agent-charlotte-bobcats-agree-ramon-sessions-two-year-dealThe Lakers chose Nash over Sessions. This is the big name that u have that didn't want to play for the Lakers?? Ramon Sessions!!
Howard went public & said it was Brooklyn or LA. Brooklyn signed Lopez & no longer had the space for Howard. That's when he choose LA. Do u not understand this?? Howard is actually on the Lakers. He is not one of the "big name that were turned off".....
Paul also was a Laker until Stern got involved. How is this a big name that was turned off when he was actually there?? What do u think he's gonna say after he goes to the Clippers?? "Yes Clipper fans I rather be w/ the Lakers but I guess I'll have to settle for the Clippers"
Keep throwing darts. I'm still waiting for that "big name" that turned down the Lakers. You say there are numerous of them but have yet to produce even one.
Ramon SessionsComment -
MensesSBR MVP
- 03-15-13
- 2755
#49The thing is....the league is scripted and every soap opera has a leading man. Where were the Lakers post magic? There you go.....and once Michael left....The Lakers Re-emerged......now that Lebron is here...not to mention durant and Irving..Lakers are no longer the leading man....they are going on another vacation........and rightfully so......they stinkComment -
RatzzSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-07-10
- 8965
#50How fukkin clueless can u be pal....
The Lakers traded for Nash on July 11th.
1) *Sessions then opted out the very next day. Of course he's going to opt out when he just got replaced*The Lakers chose Nash over Sessions. This is the big name that u have that didn't want to play for the Lakers?? Ramon Sessions!!
2) Howard went public & said it was Brooklyn or LA. Brooklyn signed Lopez & no longer had the space for Howard. That's when he choose LA. Do u not understand this?? Howard is actually on the Lakers. He is not one of the "big name that were turned off".....
*
*
2)*INCORRECT. Dwight Howard clearly specified he did NOT want to go to the Lakers. Otherwise he would have been traded MUCH earlier (during regular season last year). After speaking with Kobe directly, Lakers was no longer where he wanted to be, and would not sign an extension AND STILL HAS NOT.
http://tracking.si.com/2012/02/04/re...dwight-howard/
Dwight Howard has at most a dozen games remaining in a Laker uniform. He absolutely will not remain in the Purple & Fold.*
Comment -
RatzzSBR Hall of Famer
- 07-07-10
- 8965
#51does anyone think that Dwight Howard wants to stay on a team where:
1) he NEVER sees the ball in the 4th Qtr.
2) rarely sees it at all.
3) has Steve Nash as the starting Point Guard
4) has another over the hill player in Pau Gasol to play next to?
he wants the Houston Rockets. Harden and Lin are pre-prime... young and getting better.
could be a helluva team in 2 yrs. with Howard in there locking down the D. and getting all the rebs.
resigning as a laker is impossible, as he stated he wants to win right away.
Kobe's $30M contract next year precludes signing anybody great. And all the lost draft picks.. indicate that there is no serious help on the horizon for 5 yrs.. *
bye Dwighty
Comment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code