The Code Of NBA This Year: Team with absent players covers..or even wins STRAIGHT!

MP123 · 02-12-13, 05:39 AM

Originally posted by Sawyer

NY beats Miami without Melo. (2 days ago, NY lost when Melo scored 42 points, lol)
Spurs without regulars on TNT Thursday Night but still they cover versus Miami.
Yesterday: Short handed Spurs stun Bulls (Without Ginobili, Duncan, Jackson, Parker)

Let's see how many times it will repeat?

The lakers without Steve Nash... Negative
Without Dwight Howard.... Negative
Without Pau Gasol... Negative!!! Lol

Orlando magic without jameer Nelson
Same without JJ reddick
Same without big baby Davis

Milwaukee bucks without Larry Sanders

Should I research it n show u more?
Oh ya how can I forget
Clippers without cp3
Clippers without Chauncey
Clip without Caron butler

Oh ya and than nets without brook Lopez? These r just off the top of my head imagine if we did research 👍
This might be the biggest of all but how bout those Atlanta hawks without Lou Williams
How about Zaza pachulia
How about devin Harris
Now every1 likes to autofade them but no1 mentions their injuries...

Sawyer · 02-12-13, 06:26 AM

Your examples are not dramatic ones and I see you were unable catch my point. The spurs case was very dramatic

Good for Spurs backers hopefully..

SpreadSniper · 02-12-13, 11:08 AM

This is not a new angle by any means - degenerates the world round have been on this "trend" for years

Sawyer · 02-12-13, 12:35 PM

Sure, witnessed it many times in my betting career which is more then 10+ years. Betting public always overreact to games where one team has some serious missings etc. I just don't understand how some people overreact is so much. Spurs without 3 regualars. Okay, but they will play 2 people? Come on. Let's get real, these are professional ahtletes. Every star player has a "potential" benchwarmer who is ready to show himself.

The money amount flows to Spurs ML was insane last night..specially at pinnacle. That was crazy! Books (and Spurs backers) made a killing last night.

So my saying to betting public, THINK TWICE next time before you bet on team with missing players. There's no free money, specially in NBA.

MP123 · 02-12-13, 05:05 PM

Originally posted by Sawyer

Your examples are not dramatic ones and I see you were unable catch my point. The spurs case was very dramatic

Good for Spurs backers hopefully..

I see ur point as I took the spurs also last night, but it still depends on the situation. Remember when the thunder visited staples and the clippers announced 2 hrs before gametime that cp3 was out? U can't put money on the clips in that situation, n the thunder beat them by DD that day
Plus my reasoning for taking the spurs is they are a team that forces turnovers and get fast break buckets, which is an Achilles heel to the bulls