nba chase 12/13

**slashfan** · 01-17-13, 08:57 AM

This coming Friday (1/18/2013) is filled with S4 Bets.

Tor Fade Bet A: Tor @ 76ers.
Chi Fade Bet A: Chi @ Bos.
Dal fade Bet D: Okc @ Dal

**pellumb341** · 01-17-13, 09:38 AM

the only thing i know for sure is that i will never fade SA again ... i remember we had some weeks ago another SA fade and we won C bet : Houston +8 ...Sa was leading with about 15 points and 2 min left ,then they let Houston score and Houston covered,so we were lucky.If they would not let houston score , we would lose the serie cuz the next game SA covered.

Why good teams like LAC,SA,OKC are excluded from the system ? I mean we never back them ,and it's quite impossible that these teams don't cover 1 out of 4 games in a row.

**okbyme123** · 01-17-13, 09:57 AM

Originally posted by pellumb341

the only thing i know for sure is that i will never fade SA again ... i remember we had some weeks ago another SA fade and we won C bet : Houston +8 ...Sa was leading with about 15 points and 2 min left ,then they let Houston score and Houston covered,so we were lucky.If they would not let houston score , we would lose the serie cuz the next game SA covered.

Why good teams like LAC,SA,OKC are excluded from the system ? I mean we never back them ,and it's quite impossible that these teams don't cover 1 out of 4 games in a row.

I feel ya Bro.
Lesson learned ... don't follow blindly.
Stif has a great system ... doesn't mean you can't modify it. Personally, there are a few chases I won't start. I'm remain wary of S1 and S2. Love S3 and S4.
BOL

**cape07** · 01-17-13, 11:27 AM

Thankfully i bought 3 points for the houston game last night!! I had the game on 3 different systems and was scared as hell!!

**Grinder12000** · 01-17-13, 11:29 AM

the only thing i know for sure is that i will never fade SA again

In the last 10 years SA Fading is 50-6 the worst fade team in the NBA except for Da Bulls. They are not that great following either.

BUT - it's a system play - I follow blindly. BTW - S2 has been very good but I see no logic behind it which does worry me.

S1 Fades just blow. I just pray S1A Fades win as it's all downhill after that praying on attrition.

Thankfully i bought 3 points for the houston game last night!!

LOL WHY STOP AT THREE!!

**BuckeyeKaptn** · 01-17-13, 01:40 PM

Originally posted by pellumb341

the only thing i know for sure is that i will never fade SA again ... i remember we had some weeks ago another SA fade and we won C bet : Houston +8 ...Sa was leading with about 15 points and 2 min left ,then they let Houston score and Houston covered,so we were lucky.If they would not let houston score , we would lose the serie cuz the next game SA covered.

Why good teams like LAC,SA,OKC are excluded from the system ? I mean we never back them ,and it's quite impossible that these teams don't cover 1 out of 4 games in a row.

SA is 6-4 ATS last 10, OKC is 7-2-1, LaC is 5-5 ATS last 10 (Covers.com)

SA 24-16-1/this season, OKC is 24-13-2, LaC 24-15

**gamewinninglv** · 01-17-13, 02:24 PM

Originally posted by Asset

OKC should blow them out period, and this is the kind of games I don't like. It looks good....and then it happens, another D loss.

@gamewinninglv: I'm starting to hate you, Mr. "EXCITEMENT"!!!! LOL

LOL. I started to hate myself too Mr. Asset. I am on your side my friend.

IMPORTANT: If you are new to this thread or if you don't know what's going on. Please go to page 46 and read post # 1586 for a quick understanding BEFORE posting any questions/comments that may already been covered in that post. Thank you for your cooperation and have a Great Day !!!

**Asset** · 01-17-13, 02:53 PM

Originally posted by gamewinninglv

LOL. I started to hate myself too Mr. Asset. I am on your side my friend.

IMPORTANT: If you are new to this thread or if you don't know what's going on. Please go to page 46 and read post # 1586 for a quick understanding BEFORE posting any questions/comments that may already been covered in that post. Thank you for your cooperation and have a Great Day !!!

LOL, I know you are. The statement was just a joke

It's just I haven't been chatting with you in awhile so...

**Drakhir** · 01-17-13, 04:28 PM

The lines for tomorrow are out: Thunder -4.5 and Warriors +12
What do you guys think?

I have strong feeling that the Warriors line won't get much better.

**Stifler** · 01-17-13, 05:20 PM

just for the info: I already booked OKC -4,5 (D Bet)

**pellumb341** · 01-17-13, 05:21 PM

what book has released the lines ?

**Asset** · 01-17-13, 06:07 PM

Just an FYI, the Golden State game tomorrow. Stephen is out, so the we might get more points.

**elmagico85** · 01-17-13, 06:11 PM

pinnacle

**JW Cash** · 01-17-13, 07:02 PM

Stifler...could we get the link to your MLB thread for last year........................

**Wallco99** · 01-17-13, 07:23 PM

Oops!

**Wallco99** · 01-17-13, 07:26 PM

Originally posted by Grinder12000

In the last 10 years SA Fading is 50-6 the worst fade team in the NBA except for Da Bulls. They are not that great following either.

BUT - it's a system play - I follow blindly. BTW - S2 has been very good but I see no logic behind it which does worry me.

S1 Fades just blow. I just pray S1A Fades win as it's all downhill after that praying on attrition.

LOL WHY STOP AT THREE!!

I told you the A and B bets for s1 fades would blow, back at the beginning. They are a direct contradiction to my Chase 110 plays which, historically, have done well on the A and B bets.

**Asset** · 01-17-13, 07:55 PM

Originally posted by Wallco99

I told you the A and B bets for s1 fades would blow, back at the beginning. They are a direct contradiction to my Chase 110 plays which, historically, have done well on the A and B bets.

That's why I had said NO "S1 bets" for me.

**0tuks0** · 01-17-13, 08:09 PM

Heard you guys talking about S1, maybe this might help you:

S1
2006/2007: 107-3 (+ 51,65 units)
2007/2008: 106-0 (+ 106,00 units)
2008/2009: 114-2 (+ 77,10 units)
2009/2010: 119-4 (+ 45,20 units)
2010/2011: 98-2 (+ 61,10 units)
2011/2012: 76-2 (+ 39,10 units)
overall: 620-13 (+ 380,15 units)

S1
1.Game: 339-294
2.Game: 163-131
3.Game: 86-45
4.Game: 32-13

**Asset** · 01-17-13, 08:24 PM

Originally posted by 0tuks0

Heard you guys talking about S1, maybe this might help you:

S1
2006/2007: 107-3 (+ 51,65 units)
2007/2008: 106-0 (+ 106,00 units)
2008/2009: 114-2 (+ 77,10 units)
2009/2010: 119-4 (+ 45,20 units)
2010/2011: 98-2 (+ 61,10 units)
2011/2012: 76-2 (+ 39,10 units)
overall: 620-13 (+ 380,15 units)

S1
1.Game: 339-294
2.Game: 163-131
3.Game: 86-45
4.Game: 32-13

Okay I'm not against Stif's systems, but "backtests" to me are basically trends. In my opinion, trends are histories of what HAD happened. It DOES NOT predict the future. Information and backtests can help on future bets/games, but for ME the "S1 bets" aren't good enough to be a play.
Thanks for the record, but I had already seen it AND had experienced it myself. I'm sitting at 3 "S1 D bets" losses already, and for ME, it's not worth the headache and underwear crust LOL. Btw my avatar, well my bud(Wallco) gave it to me. It has more meanings then you think LOL.

**abzflabz** · 01-17-13, 09:08 PM

Dang it man me undies done gone look like assets after this chases

**slashfan** · 01-17-13, 09:44 PM

Originally posted by Stifler

just for the info: I already booked OKC -4,5 (D Bet)

Was there ever a record wherein an S4 lost a D bet? Or this is the first D bet of S4 ever?

**Lctham** · 01-17-13, 10:43 PM

I got -4 at bet365

**yelohell** · 01-18-13, 12:33 AM

Originally posted by slashfan

Was there ever a record wherein an S4 lost a D bet? Or this is the first D bet of S4 ever?

I think this is the first S4 D bet. Correct me if I'm wrong.

**knugen** · 01-18-13, 12:40 AM

-4 at pinnacle also, the question is if it good to take the -4

**k310** · 01-18-13, 01:48 AM

Originally posted by knugen

-4 at pinnacle also, the question is if it good to take the -4

Wondering the same thing; my local is at -4 also.

**overcome** · 01-18-13, 02:38 AM

going to buy 2 points and wager a little more just to secure this victory.

**olmec** · 01-18-13, 04:40 AM

Originally posted by knugen

-4 at pinnacle also, the question is if it good to take the -4

I think it is good enough. maybe it can go worse according to me. Oklohama will finish the series.(Hope so)

**Stifler** · 01-18-13, 05:28 AM

Originally posted by JW Cash

Stifler...could we get the link to your MLB thread for last year........................

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-b...e-systems.html

**Maleku** · 01-18-13, 06:30 AM

Originally posted by Stifler

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-b...e-systems.html

Will you be running your baseball thread again this year Stif?

I am sure we would love to contribute our daily SBR points to make the efforts worth your while

**Stifler** · 01-18-13, 07:11 AM

18.01.2013

S1

(C Bet) SA fade: Minnesota +12,5 1,10u | Memphis +5,5 2,31u | Golden State +12 4,85u

S4

(D Bet) Dal fade: Memphis -2 1,10u | Minnesota +7 2,31u | Houston +4 4,85u | OKC -4,5 10,19u
(A Bet) Chic fade: Boston - no line up atm
2u play (A Bet) Tor fade: 76ers -4 2,20u

________________________________________ ________________________________________

all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1586

**Stifler** · 01-18-13, 07:15 AM

Originally posted by Maleku

Will you be running your baseball thread again this year Stif?

I am sure we would love to contribute our daily SBR points to make the efforts worth your while

pretty sure i will. Maybe im adding some new systems if i can find something worth playing.

**slashfan** · 01-18-13, 07:18 AM

Stif, why is the chase for Tor fade 2 units? I'm not against it. Just curious. Are you confident that it'll end soon?

**Grinder12000** · 01-18-13, 09:13 AM

OKC Down to -4 -106 at 5dimes.

**skjjb4** · 01-18-13, 09:39 AM

thanks for the winning systems

**vigster** · 01-18-13, 10:09 AM

Boston line out: -3