nevermind....thought that was another punt...bad to worse
-
Comment -
this game is going to make me go crazy. just when i feel safe something else goes wrong.Comment -
ooo henry...you are truly awful...shoulda just kept running...Comment -
CFL games have so many random points scored, no bet is ever safe.Comment -
Big INT there TKAT! Nice!Comment -
wow this is tight boys...dont like that punt...its almost 3 down territory for TOR...hold d, holdComment -
Even if Toronto scores, the total will depend on two-point conversioin.Comment -
ooo hank...you terrible terrible qb...you caused all of this...thought browner had that pickComment -
they deserve it...and this was a real good lesson about betting on games featuring bad teamsComment -
i dont even mind another pick...henry you were awfulComment -
how many int's has this calgary qb had? 6?Comment -
im steamed now, and vow to get back to the week 1 and 2 ways...we will be up for the week...i promise it...Comment -
sounds good. i'll be following palComment -
wasnt even close to a flag hank, get your arms down, and sulk off the field nowComment -
Yesssss cashed my Agros ML
Comment -
Every "single" point matters, for sure. If Calgary didn't give up that single, the final would have been 24-25.Comment -
all those safeties killed...cant blame them, but dales does have a big leg and figured he could have tried to punt one...but im past that game...time to move on to fridays games...we'll get it...im liking WPG +3.5, and WPG moneyline...not sure on the total yet, but have to think over for sureComment -
Definitely. I've never seen so many safeties in one game. Nothing you can do about this game. Just move onto the next one and kill it, TKAT
Comment -
flipped flopped on this game so much i just realized i left TOR to win on my rona weekly picks contest...haha very very small consolation considering my chances to win anything are so slim...but it makes me laughComment -
Hats off to those who wagered and won on the Argos moneyline---very solid capping! More often than not it's said that simply picking the SU winners gets the PS cover as well. Well done indeed.Comment -
It's oh so difficult to wager on both the total and the side in the same game, be it football, hockey or any sport. In fact it's really comparable to placing three wagers on three different games and expecting to win all three and we know how difficult that is any time it's attempted. With that said it's actually much better to wager on two separate games as opposed to placing two wagers on the same game. Make sense? I think so.Comment -
WPG and HAM split the series last year, with a win and loss at home each...WPG won in HAM in week 15
dont have the totals, but looks like over was likely 3-1...
it is hard to judge those numbers based on the turnover WPG had from last season...
see lots of love for HAM thus far, but i think WPG has been the better team, and TOR winning tonight makes me believe they are better than most thought. think WPG had a letdown last week and will want to prove they belong. love what buck pierce has done and that offense has put up big numbers and yards.
the defense ranks high. theyve allowed 3 st touchdowns.
HAM has stunk on offense and wonder if porter will finally get a chance. glenn put up bigger numbers against cgy, but they just cant score. they also cant run, and wpg is 2nd in rush defense...
im leaning wpg +3.5 and the over as of right now. but definitely want some thoughts and opinions...together we'll cleanup on this game...Comment -
im not sure i agree. we gamble to win and we breakdown games to win. if your looking at 1 game and bet both the line and the total, then yes your basically betting 2 games...how is this different than picking a line in one and the total in another? if you think both offenses ill put up big points, but that one defense has an edge or one offense is weaker, then why not bet the over and the team you believe is better? im not quite seeing it, but to each there own...in the end, lets just get that cashComment -
No, this does not make any sense. These are two different events.
For example, you are flipping a coin(s) and trying to get a result of two heads in two coin flips. What you are saying is that it is harder to get a result of two heads if you use the same coin twice, and you would have a better chance if you used two different coins. The odds are 1 out of 4 with either method.
Therefore, I cannot agree with your assessment that wagering on both the side and total of the same game decreases your chance of hitting both to 1 out of 8. The odds are still 1 out of 4.Comment -
Thought Winnipeg was a good call with the points. Either that or the over looks good. Wish me luck for I doubled the ammount I wanted to put on this game bc of an itchy mouse finger. Lets go Bluebombers.Comment -
Glad to see some CFL going on here. I use to get the games on this random channel but they don't show them anymore. But I can watch it on my computer if i'm home. I like Winnipeg +3.5 in tomorrow's game. Would also lean to the over as well.Comment -
High Volt and TKAT my point is simply that when making two wagers on the same game, one bet can be eliminated very quickly. For example: playing BC -3 and under 50.5 in a game against Edmonton. Now if the Eskimoes were to score 24 points after 3 quarters, then the under is eliminated if the Lions are to cover the side. I find it much more difficult to win or cover two wagers on the same game as opposed to making and winning two wagers on two different games.Comment -
smilin hank had a case of the picks lastnite glad calgary lost but i did bet them to win hahaComment -
I wasn't sure one way or the other on the side but I didn't think it would go over the number. That is the CFL as they say.Comment -
Liking Winnipeg tonight as well. Not sure if I'm going to play it or not though.Comment -
That game is Friday night jhause13, actually as well as the BC-Als match.Comment
