I find myself playing the +1.5 becasue those are the games Pinnacle tells me to play.
Comment
Ganchrow
SBR Hall of Famer
08-28-05
5011
#37
Raiders,
I'm agreeing with you here. I was just trying to answer EBone's question regarding selling a 2-run middle at +185 @ +185 based strictly upon his a priori assumption of a 30% chance of a one-run game either way. I do note that this represents a vast oversimplification.
Comment
EBone
SBR MVP
08-10-05
1787
#38
This is why I threw it out there. It totally makes sense to me, because of this discussion, that my theory was and is a "vast oversimplification". I should have taken all factors that have been discussed here into account. I guess I got lucky with what I was doing in June and July.
However, I still think, theoretically, that if I could find, on average, a -1.5 +186 on one side and -1.5 +186 on the other side and found that situation more than 50% of the time, that this would be a good representative sampling in a typical baseball season. The kicker is finding that particular situation more than 50% of the time, which, as I had indicated, was very hard to do. So, maybe my point is moot.
Great stuff though from Raiders and Ganchrow. I sure do like it when I come across people that are smarter than me and share common interests. Learning can be phun.
E
Comment
Ganchrow
SBR Hall of Famer
08-28-05
5011
#39
Originally posted by raiders72001
Good post but +206/-224 is better than -111/+101 for the player. Theoretical hold on +206/-224 is 1.78% while +101/-111 is 2.3%
Again. Mea culpa.
I just modified the original post to use better numbers.