It seems like at least every other thread there is a poster talking about "value" this and "value" that. It seems to me that the only "valuable" bet is the one that wins, whether it means laying chalk or taking the dog. Here are some of the ways I think it is being used so far on this forum:
1. I have decided to bet on team A, and I am a really good capper, so therefore there must be a lot of "value" with team A.
2. The so-called public (another term for another day) is all over team A, so therefore team B must have value, and thus I will bet on them.
3. Team A is a really big underdog, so therefore Team A has value and I will bet on them.
4. Team A is not as big of a favorite as I thought they would be, so therefore Team A must have value, and I will bet on them.
Just tired of seeing this word thrown around like it is the end-all, be-all of sports wagering.
1. I have decided to bet on team A, and I am a really good capper, so therefore there must be a lot of "value" with team A.

2. The so-called public (another term for another day) is all over team A, so therefore team B must have value, and thus I will bet on them.

3. Team A is a really big underdog, so therefore Team A has value and I will bet on them.

4. Team A is not as big of a favorite as I thought they would be, so therefore Team A must have value, and I will bet on them.

Just tired of seeing this word thrown around like it is the end-all, be-all of sports wagering.