Today’s Ugly Dog Plays.

[GGPLAYER]

I'm going to try to keep this going, if I have the time.
I haven't been doing any of Sportrends Systems in here..I just started this thread to have some fun and took off, who new is was going to show +1000 betting only 30 or 40 a game. So I will keep it going, I just dont want to lose anyone's money.
I'm duff as nails and can take the losses, like the one we had yesterday on #$%# LAD.
When we lose money with ST, its on there back,not mine. We have a lot of good people in this thread, so I just dont want it to die off.
BOL

Nice work this weekend Shiva. I took a few days off. But then tried to venture out on my own Sat/Sun. Bad idea. I have pissed away months of hard work from the NBA season. I do this every year when baseball starts so it's no surprise. I just need to pick one system and stick with it. I hear how so many people make money with baseball but I have yet to be one of those people. I'll keep an eye on this thread and the Formula Wiz one and see if I can't make a buck here in the next few weeks.

[BrewMaster]

SCIENTIFIC APPROACH:
Line must be greater than or equal to ( >= ) the posted value

Philadelphia Phillies >= -140
Washington Nationals >= +102
Florida Marlins >= -148

FILTERED PLAYS:
Colorado Rockies, <20 innings pitched
New York Yankees, worse than -175
San Diego Padres, >2 game losing streak



If someone is familiar with this approach, please verify my logic until I get acclimated to posting system plays. FYI, my logic symbols are relative to mathematical definitions (i.e. -135 > -140)

Thanks. GL.

[barts185]

removed as per SB's request

[Small Timer]

Washington and Florida overlapping in those two approaches, very interesting, hopefully it gets off to a good start.

[barts185]

removed as per SB's request

[HoulihansTX]

One question / one suggestion, I am actually trying to help and not be a pain, and also make it so that there might be less questions from people looking at the thread. Question: I thought the BPS didn't start until May 15? Or is the website ("This system does not kick in until May 15") incorrect? Suggestion: It looks like there are other plays. I think it would be helpful to those viewing it if possible plays, and the reasons they were eliminated were listed. For example, today ARI - 4 game losing streak LAA - 4 game losing streak Or, it that's too much of a pain, just list that the following were eliminated due to filters: ARI, LAA It might save some questions from people throughout the day asking "Why isn't this team a play?" Good Luck, Bart

I do not want to take the time to list why a team is not a play. I will list the parameters, but nothing else.

Also you are right about there being another play, and I will add it.

Atlanta 0.81

I do not play these, b/c they are borderline IMO. I prefer for it to be ov/un 1. It further filters out plays

• Never bet on a team favorite in which you must lay over -175.
• Never bet on teams that are on a 2 game or more losing streak.
• Never bet against a team on a 2 game winning streak or more.

[barts185]

removed as per SB's request.

[barts185]

removed as per SB's request.

[BrewMaster]

Your mathematical symbols, while correctly used, are the opposite of how people for ST threads have used them in the past.

My suggestion, which I've made in the past, is to use words and make it less confusing. Doesn't take that much longer to type -148 or better as opposed to >=-148 (or, <=-148 or even <-148 with the "=" implied, depending on which convention you are using).

Failing that, people at least need to agree whether or not they are going to use the symbols correctly, or not correctly. Having poster A use -3>-4 and poster B use -3<-4 is going to cause all sorts of confusion.

Agreed. I have a degree in mathematics, so using the operator wrong would just confuse me! I will use the "or better" terms from herein.

Looks correct (although as anyone who paid attention last year knows, you shouldn't take my word for it since I don't know anything).

Also, if you are listing filtered plays, there are others (NYY, SDG) which are currently filtered, at least according to the lines on the page. It looks line the line for SDG on the page is wrong. It currently shows the actual (not Proj) ML for ATL at -126 and the actual ML for SDG at -185. Too bad SDG is on a 4 game losing streak, projected ML of -2.61 and they are an underdog?

The Yanks you need to lay over -175. So this play gets filtered out. And the Pads line is wrong, but the losing streak filters them out as well.

Thanks for the verification!

[HoulihansTX]

It must be a typo, b/c it would make for too many plays.

[Beefcakes]

is shiva not posting anymore?

[ShivaBowl]

is shiva not posting anymore?

I hope you missed yesterdays post...

[ShivaBowl]

Nice turn around Shiva. Keep it going Bud.

That`s it Joe, my ass is the size of a grapefruit, no more Cubes,
I'm done with them for the rest of the year, the books win.
Thank god, now I can move on.
Black List
CWS, CHC,
BOL, my friend!

[Beefcakes]

aw that sucks man

[ShivaBowl]

xxx

[High3rEl3m3nt]

Not sure about you guys...but I have been on a great run just playing team totals and game totals...much easier than selecting winners. Give it a shot Shiva! -HE

[ShivaBowl]

Shit night Beefcakes 0-3, If only one good thing came out of last night, is, I limited the damage, with $25.00 flat wagers.

[ShivaBowl]

xxx

[ShivaBowl]

Today’s plays based on early lines.
$45.00 Wager
8:05 PM ET Colorado Rockies, -140, Get in early.

[ShivaBowl]

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-handicapping/1051406-new-mlb-system-strategies-based-statistics.html

ST Link

[ShivaBowl]

Ok Guys, the new ST System is up, lets get to work!
BOL

http://forum.sbrforum.com/baseball-handicapping/1051406-new-mlb-system-strategies-based-statistics.html

[ShivaBowl]

Today’s plays based on early lines.
Updated

$45.00 Wager
8:05 PM ET Colorado Rockies, -140,
$35.00 Wagers
8:10 PM ET Cincinnati Reds, +105
7:05 PM ET Washington Nationals, -118
9:40 PM ET Arizona Diamondbacks, +117
BOL

[Aussiecapper101]

Hit em back today buddy

[feedmecappers]

Been following a while and respect what you're doing man.

[ShivaBowl]

Hit em back today buddy

Thanks Aussiecapper101, fallow me, to a bigger and better boat, my friend!
BOL

[ShivaBowl]

Yesterdays Plays.
2-2
YTD, +1,003.94
Plays Later

Its going on two weeks now,
stuck at $1000 what a grind,
not making any money or losing any.

[ShivaBowl]

Today’s plays based on early lines.
$40.00 Wager
3:35 PM ET Atlanta Braves,-107
3:40 PM ET Arizona Diamondbacks, +135
7:05 PM ET Cleveland Indians,-136
7:05 PM ET Boston Red Sox, -150
8:05 PM ET St. Louis Cardinals, 132
BOL

[ShivaBowl]

Today’s plays based on early lines.
Updated

$45.00 Wagers
3:35 PM ET Atlanta Braves,-107
7:05 PM ET Cleveland Indians,-135
7:05 PM ET Boston Red Sox, -136
8:05 PM ET St. Louis Cardinals, -133
$25.00 Wagers
1:10 PM ET Cincinnati Reds, +135
3:40 PM ET Arizona Diamondbacks, +135
BOL

[Small Timer]

Like 'em
Shiva thanks for the picks

[wikaj]

Good luck today shiva. BTW, are these selections made with the ST systems?

[ShivaBowl]

Good luck today shiva. BTW, are these selections made with the ST systems?

NO,tks

[ShivaBowl]

Yesterdays Plays.
4-2
Plays Later

[ShivaBowl]

Today’s plays based on early lines.
$50.00 Wagers
12:35 PM ET San Francisco Giants, +104
7:05 PM ET New York Mets, -105
8:05 PM ET St. Louis Cardinals, -137

$25.00 Wagers
2:05 PM ET Toronto Blue Jays, + 140
9:40 PM ET Arizona Diamondbacks, -102

[docvinny]

great job yesterday

[ShivaBowl]

Today’s plays based on early lines.
Updated

$50.00 Wagers
12:35 PM ET San Francisco Giants, +104
7:05 PM ET New York Mets, -105
8:05 PM ET St. Louis Cardinals, -137

$25.00 Wagers
2:05 PM ET Toronto Blue Jays, + 140
9:40 PM ET Arizona Diamondbacks, -102
1:05 PM ET Seattle Mariners, 100