John Morrison 2011 MLB

[jphil]

Jm mlb

hagball: would it be possible to distinguish between the unoff.& off. w/l's under your v2 plays, instead of combining them? (since the v2's are normally just off. bets). Your discretion of course.


next yr. JM will be including unoff.'s, as off.'s, the way things are panning out.

[Andy3568]

next yr. JM will be including unoff.'s, as off.'s, the way things are panning out.

Nah, he'll just expand the RPI filter from 0.015 to 0.050.

[soldier1047]

Wait a second...I was responding to someone insulting me...really you should quote both people...what was said and what was responded...

Pulling for you guys on another "D" bet today...does it seem like a lot of games are going to "D" for you guys, which would mean one win out of four games?

That is the problem-RESPONDING. By responding, you are contributing to negativity. Ask yourself this....Is that a good use of your time??

[J.M. Disciple]

i'm on G's side on this one. G has been very positive recently, until someone clowns on him, then he responds back. There is nothing wrong with that. If you all would stop dissing on G's Picks he wouldn't have comments like the one above. He has been supporting wallco with his picks for the most part and offering pretty good contributions.

Just as Soldier1047 said above me, if you dont like what G said then ignore it. Dont bother responding to it. I enjoy G's contributions and just wish for everyone to stop bagging the guy and let him contribute to the thread. He is full of statistics and if you all would stop givng him a hard time, then maybe, just maybe he will provide some of those stats for everyone instead of responding negatively to others comments.

Keep up the good work G.

--JMD

[alexknyc]

That is the problem-RESPONDING. By responding, you are contributing to negativity. Ask yourself this....Is that a good use of your time??

Actually, it's not RESPONDING that's the problem. It's the fact that G came here and started shit. Just like he has in at least 4 other threads.

G has done quite well as a handicapper over the last six weeks or so. Too bad, it's been overshadowed somewhat by his acting like an ass in other people's threads.

Here's some free, unsolicited advice for everyone-- if everyone thinks you're acting like an ass, maybe it's because you're acting like an ass.

If you think that advice is aimed at you, it probably is.

[G's pks]

Actually, it's not RESPONDING that's the problem. It's the fact that G came here and started shit. Just like he has in at least 4 other threads.

G has done quite well as a handicapper over the last six weeks or so. Too bad, it's been overshadowed somewhat by his acting like an ass in other people's threads.

Here's some free, unsolicited advice for everyone-- if everyone thinks you're acting like an ass, maybe it's because you're acting like an ass.

If you think that advice is aimed at you, it probably is.

Guy its not 6 weeks... I have been a winning capper on sbr for three years in all sports and I see glaring problems with this system win or lose...

Chases that go to "D" bets regularly are dangerous...

Risk reward is still way to much for most once a bet passes "B" which most of them are here...

Statistics are being completely ignored...you were risking 10 units which for a few...doubt many the way this system has been doing is 1000...

The system continues to pick teams that are flat out statistically in slumps and playing poorly... or terrible on the road against good teams... Seriously the dodger pick against the giants was laughable stat wise the worst since the 40 unit loss a few weeks ago... SF one of the best home teams against a pitiful dodger team that is terrible on the road and batting at a .191 clip during the last week...oh my!

Some of you need to stop being so lazy...dig up a few stats...avoid the horrible teams and you can do this on your own...

Seriously picking a winner one out of four plays is 25% most of you could do it without the handholding..

Say what you want about me...do i care? If you have not figured that out by now start tapping on your head... Winning is what this forum is about...

[G's pks]

i'm on G's side on this one. G has been very positive recently, until someone clowns on him, then he responds back. There is nothing wrong with that. If you all would stop dissing on G's Picks he wouldn't have comments like the one above. He has been supporting wallco with his picks for the most part and offering pretty good contributions.

Just as Soldier1047 said above me, if you dont like what G said then ignore it. Dont bother responding to it. I enjoy G's contributions and just wish for everyone to stop bagging the guy and let him contribute to the thread. He is full of statistics and if you all would stop givng him a hard time, then maybe, just maybe he will provide some of those stats for everyone instead of responding negatively to others comments.

Keep up the good work G.

--JMD

Thanks most have no real interest in any of the sports...that is the whole problem...dig through this thread and look for actual win streaks..or any actual baseball being discussed!

I used to review several stats in my thread over the past few years...but all people want is winning picks most do not really have interest in the game itself...that is why they are losers... ever wonder why so few of us win on a regular basis...

There seems to be no rhyme or reason to some of the poor picks in here...but as long as the poor win percentage is acceptable that is fine for them... i would be torched if my picks were this bad on a regular basis...

Later boys..have a good night...

[J.M. Disciple]

Thanks most have no real interest in any of the sports...that is the whole problem...dig through this thread and look for actual win streaks..or any actual baseball being discussed!

I used to review several stats in my thread over the past few years...but all people want is winning picks most do not really have interest in the game itself...that is why they are losers... ever wonder why so few of us win on a regular basis...

There seems to be no rhyme or reason to some of the poor picks in here...but as long as the poor win percentage is acceptable that is fine for them... i would be torched if my picks were this bad on a regular basis...

Later boys..have a good night...

As always my answer to everything is to use the labby for them. If you can hit 50% on your picks G the labby will crush. Just as the Labby has been crushing for Attari. He is up like 38 units or something over past couple weeks. Just smoking the books using good stats and labby. The two together are just golden.

I can come up with a million different systems using the labby. Just need bankrolls to do them. For instance you can labby the Yankees every game ML and show a nice profit with the labby. Any of the top teams really and you will be hitting well over the 34% needed for the labby.

Good luck everyone on todays bets.

Back to a positive thread.

[thelimit0310]

As always my answer to everything is to use the labby for them. If you can hit 50% on your picks G the labby will crush. Just as the Labby has been crushing for Attari. He is up like 38 units or something over past couple weeks. Just smoking the books using good stats and labby. The two together are just golden.

I can come up with a million different systems using the labby. Just need bankrolls to do them. For instance you can labby the Yankees every game ML and show a nice profit with the labby. Any of the top teams really and you will be hitting well over the 34% needed for the labby.

Good luck everyone on todays bets.

Back to a positive thread.

Well said JMD, the great thing about baseball is that it really boils down to basic statistics, making the games easier to cap than most other sports. You could really just handicap your own picks and play with a labby and turn good profit.

[NZT-48]

hey hag or anyone who actually keeps up or follows the JM MLB plays this mos.

but is anyone kind of astonished that we have possible 21 plays this mos but it looks as if that we only have 6 official plays thats pretty weak here folks especially in a 31 day mos to only have 6 official plays for his v1.0 system isnt exactly winning no? lol

[hagball52]

hagball: would it be possible to distinguish between the unoff.& off. w/l's under your v2 plays, instead of combining them? (since the v2's are normally just off. bets). Your discretion of course.


next yr. JM will be including unoff.'s, as off.'s, the way things are panning out.

I'll tinker with it. I do have it on that personal list that I sent you earlier this week. They're all listed next to the series unless they lose during a winning series, then I have an asterisk by them with a note below.

P.S. I really don't expect that many plays through the course of the season. It's already more than I expected.

[hagball52]

hey hag or anyone who actually keeps up or follows the JM MLB plays this mos.

but is anyone kind of astonished that we have possible 21 plays this mos but it looks as if that we only have 6 official plays thats pretty weak here folks especially in a 31 day mos to only have 6 official plays for his v1.0 system isnt exactly winning no? lol

Yeah this could be a record low year for official plays. I play almost all of the unofficial ones. There's just too much value left on the table if you don't play them. I do my own personal handicapping on the unofficial plays and some of the time I go both ways and collect 2 times on the series. I just did that with CLE/BAL and KAN/MIN.

[soldier1047]

Dang. Wallco came back with a vengeance. Good win, today!

[Wallco99]

check my thread and let me know how I did goof...while you guys are busy losing another "D" bet on a team batting .191 in their last five games (really???)and dropping another 10 units...I went 2-0...

boy that v2 is hot...5-11 last 16...seriously I could not do that bad if I tried...

Maybe you could be the plus$$$ first customer and pay for it...what a joke...a marketer...

yeah you can tell by my point total that I am hurting...about to cash out another $200 worth of stuff...

Quit talking crap...when what you follow is not even comparable...

Funny, with all these losses, I am still ahead of you, and your waste of time approach to gambling. Both system total and total since my first post are further in the BLACK than yours. If my system is that bad, then yours must be horrible. What an idiot.

[Wallco99]

i'm on G's side on this one. G has been very positive recently, until someone clowns on him, then he responds back. There is nothing wrong with that. If you all would stop dissing on G's Picks he wouldn't have comments like the one above. He has been supporting wallco with his picks for the most part and offering pretty good contributions.

Just as Soldier1047 said above me, if you dont like what G said then ignore it. Dont bother responding to it. I enjoy G's contributions and just wish for everyone to stop bagging the guy and let him contribute to the thread. He is full of statistics and if you all would stop givng him a hard time, then maybe, just maybe he will provide some of those stats for everyone instead of responding negatively to others comments.

Keep up the good work G.

--JMD

Nah, they're right, she's a douchebag. If you don't like it, too bad. I have no problem with you at all, but this has to be the biggest bunch of nonsense you have ever written on here. She is Marie Barone who thinks she is the only person who knows anything and her ignorance becomes more obvious every day.

[Wallco99]

Thanks most have no real interest in any of the sports...that is the whole problem...dig through this thread and look for actual win streaks..or any actual baseball being discussed!

I used to review several stats in my thread over the past few years...but all people want is winning picks most do not really have interest in the game itself...that is why they are losers... ever wonder why so few of us win on a regular basis...

There seems to be no rhyme or reason to some of the poor picks in here...but as long as the poor win percentage is acceptable that is fine for them... i would be torched if my picks were this bad on a regular basis...

Later boys..have a good night...

You would be torched because all of your picks are favorites, going past A or B is bad in that case. In +money systems it's not. I still don't know why you can't get that through your head.

[NZT-48]

Yeah this could be a record low year for official plays. I play almost all of the unofficial ones. There's just too much value left on the table if you don't play them. I do my own personal handicapping on the unofficial plays and some of the time I go both ways and collect 2 times on the series. I just did that with CLE/BAL and KAN/MIN.

yeah good pt hag it seems u gotta play them but maybe play them at a much lower rate in your bankroll in case one of the unofficial plays defunks on you if you happen to play it you know

but these official plays has been the lowest in one mos that I've ever seen

[lawalahmed]

G's Vs Wallco

Who will win ?

Venue: JM thread

Date: 21 - 07 - 2011

Time: 8:00p.m (C.E.T)


I'm confuse may be i should put my money on G's becos i know him since Rich N.B.A Basketball pick or Wallco who take over JM thread..........

Who is Favourite and Underdog in this fight ?

[ken23lau]

G's Vs Wallco

Who will win ?

Venue: JM thread

Date: 21 - 07 - 2011

Time: 8:00p.m (C.E.T)


I'm confuse may be i should put my money on G's becos i know him since Rich N.B.A Basketball pick or Wallco who take over JM thread..........

Who is Favourite and Underdog in this fight ?

English?

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 152-11 (v2: 12-1)
System profit/loss: +23.23 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +2.96 units (137-11) (fin. series)
Current open series: 0

(7/20/11):
#159 Toronto (-1½) v2 (D) - Win
#161 Toronto (-1½) (B) - Win
#162 Toronto (-1½) v2 (B) - Win

(A) 82-81
(B) 38-43
(C) 20-23
(D) 12-11


There are no system plays for (7/21/11)

[analyzer]

Nice way to clear the board last night Wallco! Take a breather - see you back on Friday!

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 15-1 (v1)
(A) 10-6
(B) 3-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 4-3
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 17-0

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(7/21/2011) Minnesota (.491) v Detroit (.508) R/L (A) (4 gm set (D) bet if necc.)

Upcoming Plays
(7/22/2011) San Diego @ Philadelphia
(7/22/2011) Oakland @ NY Yankees
(7/22/2011) Chicago Cubs v Houston
(7/22/2011) Colorado @ Arizona **

Notes: Tomorrow CHC and COL will both be official if COL is a play. We'll see what JM's email looks like. Out of 2 possible sweeps yesterday, there were zero. There are 3 possible sweeps today. Just forecasting into the future it looks like approximately 11 possible official plays until the end of August. That will probably change but it doesn't look like we'll even get 30 official plays all season. That being said, the unofficial plays are undefeated. GL all today.

P.S. I am not playing MIN today. I'm taking a wait and see approach because of the pitching match up.

** COL may or may not be a play. Waiting for the official email tomorrow. COL lost 3 games in a row against ARI but won the first one of a doubleheader which was a make up game from a rain out.

[zeusky]

Good work Hagball; thank you as always.

[thelimit0310]

So few plays with JM, all the filters he adds really kills the amount of plays there are. Almost have to play the Unofficial plays to make it worthwhile. Thanks Hagball

[jphil]

"I'll tinker with it. I do have it on that personal list that I sent you earlier this week. They're all listed next to the series unless they lose during a winning series, then I have an asterisk by them with a note below."



Thanx hagball. So then broken down it's this:

V2 plays 4-3
(off.) 1-1
(unoff.) 3-2


good work.

[hagball52]

JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 15-1 (v1)
(A) 10-6
(B) 3-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 4-3
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 17-0 (1 series pending)

*Unofficial*
(7/21/2011) Minnesota (.491) v Detroit (.508) R/L (A)Loss

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(7/22/2011) Minnesota (.491) v Detroit (.508) R/L (B) (7/23 (C) & 7/24 (D) if necc.) V2 play
(7/22/2011) San Diego (.480) @ Philadelphia (.536) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.) Poss. V3 play
(7/22/2011) Oakland (.489)@ NY Yankees (.534) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.) Poss. V3 play

Official
(7/22/2011) Chicago Cubs (.472)v Houston (.456) M/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.)
(7/22/2011) Colorado (.497)@ Arizona (.501) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.) **

** Not sure about the COL play. Waiting to see what JM puts in his email tomorrow.

Notes: Out of 3 possible sweeps today there were 2. Get out your calenders and mark 'em down:
SEA v TOR (8/15)
FLA @ SDG (8/18)
I might be off a little on the rpi because I'm posting tonight but it won't change that much by morning. I'm off to Arizona for a rush job tomorrow. Should be home tomorrow night. Doubt I'll get a chance to bet any of the plays but GL all.

[J.M. Disciple]

I like the official plays, but fade Oakland. ... They have like the worst winning % in baseball vs the yanks. I'm going to bet on Yanks ML tomorrow to clear 4 #s out of 6 on my labby line

GOod luck everyone. Huge bet for me.

--JMD

[sweethook]

nice work , gl. man

[hagball52]

Originally Posted by hagball52
JM MLB System

2011 Official season series record 15-1 (v1)
(A) 10-6
(B) 3-3
(C) 2-1
V2 plays 4-3
V3 system 3-1
Unofficial series 17-0 (1 series pending)

*Unofficial*
(7/21/2011) Minnesota (.491) v Detroit (.508) R/L (A)Loss

Next Plays
*Unofficial*
(7/22/2011) Minnesota (.491) v Detroit (.508) R/L (B) (7/23 (C) & 7/24 (D) if necc.) V2 play
(7/22/2011) San Diego (.480) @ Philadelphia (.536) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.) Poss. V3 play
(7/22/2011) Oakland (.489)@ NY Yankees (.534) R/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.) Poss. V3 play

Official
(7/22/2011) Chicago Cubs (.472)v Houston (.456) M/L (A) (3 gm set (C) bet if necc.)

Notes: Out of 3 possible sweeps today there were 2. Get out your calenders and mark 'em down:
SEA v TOR (8/15)
FLA @ SDG (8/18)
I might be off a little on the rpi because I'm posting tonight but it won't change that much by morning. I'm off to Arizona for a rush job tomorrow. Should be home tomorrow night. Doubt I'll get a chance to bet any of the plays but GL all.

Colorado is not a play. Got the JM email. Here's his post

http://www.sportsbettingchamp.com/463282

You can play it if you want but we won't score it win or lose.[/color]

[Wallco99]

Wallco MLB PLU$$$
2011 System to date: 152-11 (v2: 12-1)
System profit/loss: +23.23 units (finished series)
Since my first post: +2.96 units (137-11) (fin. series)
Current open series: 0



There are no system plays for (7/22/11)

[bauerranch]

I like the official plays, but fade Oakland. ... They have like the worst winning % in baseball vs the yanks. I'm going to bet on Yanks ML tomorrow to clear 4 #s out of 6 on my labby line

GOod luck everyone. Huge bet for me.

--JMD

Good Luck and I am tailing you on Yanks- They have only lost once in the last 11 games there. Here is a great three games series to take the Fade on JM

[thelimit0310]

The Yanks only lost once out of 11 but that one time was yesterday, be cautious but good luck!

[J.M. Disciple]

He was referring to 1 time against Oak in the last 11 games. Cahill suppose to be a good pitcher, but im sure Yanks have faced Cahill before and won. They faced all of the A's pitchers and won. Not really worried about the pitching match up. A's have no offense and Yanks have good offense, but they have been in a slump lately. Even though they are in their slump they are still a better team at their worse then the A's are at their best.

I'm still loving the Yanks.

Great win on chicago today vs Houston. I wish I would of tried to clear 2-4 #s on my line first with that game, then if that lost clear some with the Yanks. Bad time management on my part.

Good luck with the unofficial plays today, besides Oakland, hope you all lose that one lol.

[bauerranch]

He was referring to 1 time against Oak in the last 11 games. Cahill suppose to be a good pitcher, but im sure Yanks have faced Cahill before and won. They faced all of the A's pitchers and won. Not really worried about the pitching match up. A's have no offense and Yanks have good offense, but they have been in a slump lately. Even though they are in their slump they are still a better team at their worse then the A's are at their best.

I'm still loving the Yanks.

Great win on chicago today vs Houston. I wish I would of tried to clear 2-4 #s on my line first with that game, then if that lost clear some with the Yanks. Bad time management on my part.

Good luck with the unofficial plays today, besides Oakland, hope you all lose that one lol.

Good Call

[Andy3568]

Congrats to all the JM players who cashed in with the Cubs.

And if you played the Rockies even though JM didn't consider it a play, congrats to you too.