ML Dogs (simple system)

[The Investor]

1. Oakland (+1.50)

2. Balt (+1.45)

3. Florida (+1.65)

4. WSOX (+1.05)

5. Angles (+1.10)

what do they all have in common?

Listed pitchers, risking one unit.

[durito]

what do they all have in common?

They are all worse odds than are available at matchbook.

[donjuan]

what do they all have in common?

They all are lower than 1/50 in fractional odds?

[The Investor]

the lines are from betjam.

i will list 100 plays, then ill tell you what they have in common. they will do no worse than (50-50) and they will all be moneyline dogs.

if not, ill leave SBR for good. now how is that for a guarantee.

[pokernut9999]

What's the prize if we guess right ?

[donjuan]

Prop bet?

[The Investor]

the prize is, the money that you will be able to make, by knowing what the real LIVE DOGS have in common.

i searched the NHL tonight and no plays were found. it wont take long for me to run thru 100.

[durito]

if not, ill leave SBR for good. now how is that for a guarantee.

You keep making this guarantee, I'm not sure what the point is.

i will list 100 plays, then ill tell you what they have in common. they will do no worse than (50-50) and they will all be moneyline dogs.

good luck with that

[dmiles1021]

gl

[pokernut9999]

I do think you will get a return on that tonight, good luck

[The Investor]

they all have 3 things in common. exactly 3.

this will give you the little edge, in selecting dogs. there are alot of smart people on this site, who seem to know everything, just surprised they have not shown you this.

[donjuan]

Investor,

I propose the following prop bet:

You have 45 days to post 100 underdog ML plays (starting tomorrow). If you go 50-50 or better, you win the bet. 49-51 or worse and I win. Escrow money with reputable poster.

[beaneaters]

Who are five teams that have not been in my kitchen.

[pokernut9999]

1. All dogs
2. All have better record
3. All pithers are righties

[The Investor]

no side bet for the first 100 plays, trust me, the first 100 wont take long.

ok smart guys, here are 3 nba plays that fit the criteria and they will count toward the 100.

6. portland (+1.10)

7. houston (+1.30)

8. New Orleans (+1.80)

now remember, i did not say, will be profitable. im going to make it even harder than that. i said they will go (50-50).

after i do this, ill take on any and all comers.

im out for several hours, so try and keep the cheap shots to a minimum and if i go 49-51, im done for good at SBR.

OUT.

[Arnold]

the lines are from betjam.

i will list 100 plays, then ill tell you what they have in common. they will do no worse than (50-50) and they will all be moneyline dogs.

if not, ill leave SBR for good. now how is that for a guarantee.

What happened to your NBA system? You gave up on it.

[donjuan]

no side bet for the first 100 plays, trust me, the first 100 wont take long.

Why no side bet, then?

[rake922]

6. portland (+1.10)

7. houston (+1.30)

8. New Orleans (+1.80)

They all are coming off a win, and also are .500 or better winning percentage

[The Investor]

donjuan, you will thank me for not taking you up on your wager but there will be time, later.

Arnold, i could have shown this forum alot of things but some here, think they know everything.

I will discuss the (Simple ML System) once the 100 plays are in the books and it wont take long.

[donjuan]

So your reason is that you don't want to take my money? Seems strange for an "investor."

[The Investor]

i very rarely wager anyone on the internet. too risky but if you insist, once the 100 plays are in the books, i may take you up on it.

[pokernut9999]

So far tonight very impressive !!!

[donjuan]

i very rarely wager anyone on the internet. too risky but if you insist, once the 100 plays are in the books, i may take you up on it.

Risky? As I said, escrow with a reputable poster.

[The Investor]

i havent been on this forum long enough to know a reputable poster.

if i dont go (50-50), i wont be around for you to wager with but i doubt that happens.

[Trojan]

i havent been on this forum long enough to know a reputable poster.

if i dont go (50-50), i wont be around for you to wager with but i doubt that happens.

You tried the "Live Dogs" last year and it failed miserably.

How are your computer plays coming along?
How are your totals only coming?
How did your head to head bets with TTP go?
How did your "I'm gonna show you how to beat the books" go?

I'll tell you. They all hit a rough spot and you quit and started over with some other ridiculous scheme, much like you are doing here at SBR.

I have a novel idea. Why dont you actually try and handicap a game instead all this bullshit you keep coming up with.

Two things I am certain of:

1 - You will not stick with this and hit 100 plays
2 - You will be back with another scheme after you quit.

Go ahead prove me wrong. I hope nobody is falling for your scam because they will lose some serious money following your horrible betting strategies.

[pokernut9999]

I do think you will get a return on that tonight, good luck

3-1 and leading in the last one. I will give you props

[The Investor]

there are definatley some people in this thread, who are totally confused.

as a general rule, when playing dogs, wait as long as possible to place your wagers.

for posting purposes, here are saturdays plays.

ML Dogs: 3-5 (-0.55 units)

9. Yanks (+1.50)

10. Oakland (+1.85)

11. Cubs (+1.45)

12. Texas (+1.40)

13. Reds (+1.10)

14. Florida (+1.10)

15. Padres (+1.10)

that is all for saturday. 85 more plays to go. just follow along smart guys.

[The Investor]

really bad saturday: 1-6 (-4.15 units)

ML Dogs; 4-11 (-4.70 units)

sundays plays

16. oak (+1.35)
17. balt (+1.20)
18. minn (+1.05)
19. angels (+1.20)
20. yanks (+1.40)
21. milwaukee (+1.25)
22. cubs (+1.10)
23. marlins (+1.30)
24. cards (+1.20)
25. padres (+1.30)

really need to turn it around today or ill soon be out of here.

[Meestermike]

really bad saturday: 1-6 (-4.15 units)

ML Dogs; 4-11 (-4.70 units)

sundays plays

16. oak (+1.35)
17. balt (+1.20)
18. minn (+1.05)
19. angels (+1.20)
20. yanks (+1.40)
21. milwaukee (+1.25)
22. cubs (+1.10)
23. marlins (+1.30)
24. cards (+1.20)
25. padres (+1.30)

really need to turn it around today or ill soon be out of here.

.

[The Investor]

ML Dogs: 7-17 (-7.05 units)

angels win didnt count, as bedard didnt pitch..

mondays plays.

kc (+1.10)
oak (+1.40)
tb (+1.15)
minn (+1.40)
bos (+1.20)
balt (+1.15)
pitt (+1.65)

thats it for monday.

[patsfan2727]

I'm not a pro or anything, but it doesnt look like your system is working?

Why not take runlines with bigger + odds, that way you can pretty much win 1 out of 3 and still come out almost even?

that, and the fact that if +120 bets were so easy to win, I don't think vegas would make them available?

[The Investor]

dont bury me yet..

ML Dogs: 12-19 (-2.55 units)

tuesdays day games..

32. oak (+1.10)
33. royals (+1.20)

back later today, with the rest..

[The Investor]

adding for tuesday

34. twins (+1.20)
35. balt (+1.25)
36. pitt (+1.80)

nothing else today.

[donjuan]

The lack of prop bet makes me sad.