It was juiced at over 11.5 until the final 10 minutes, where it went to 12 and was then juiced at 12.
Over was the play, dikhead. It's funny you say this in hindsight like it was an "easy" call. Again, the public was on the under.
i'm concerned about winning not about the public
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#53
Originally posted by Cappinpicks
i'm concerned about winning not about the public
So if the under was such an easy "win," why didn't you play it?
Comment
gshock1
SBR Hall of Famer
12-04-09
5366
#54
Originally posted by Cappinpicks
over 12 was juiced what a joke
Wouldn't write it off yet
Comment
badluckd
SBR High Roller
07-16-10
166
#55
The game will end 6-4 cards
Comment
gshock1
SBR Hall of Famer
12-04-09
5366
#56
Originally posted by badluckd
The game will end 6-4 cards
Comment
Cappinpicks
SBR Posting Legend
03-11-10
14986
#57
Originally posted by No coincidences
So if the under was such an easy "win," why didn't you play it?
I took the cubs huge instead
Comment
babyanni
SBR MVP
09-23-09
1780
#58
thats was ??
Comment
gshock1
SBR Hall of Famer
12-04-09
5366
#59
The cards have given up! Holliday doesn't even bother running to first.
Comment
Cappinpicks
SBR Posting Legend
03-11-10
14986
#60
Let's go wells pitch a shut out
Comment
knickfan1
SBR High Roller
11-20-09
183
#61
STL can't swing for shit...they suck right now
Comment
BillAccpetor
SBR Wise Guy
02-07-09
790
#62
Originally posted by No coincidences
It was juiced at over 11.5 until the final 10 minutes, where it went to 12 and was then juiced at 12. Over was the play, dikhead. It's funny you say this in hindsight like it was an "easy" call. Again, the public was on the under.
Sorry, but which sources did you check? IMO the people, squares were hitting the OVER...
Comment
SRBI
SBR Hall of Famer
10-20-09
8393
#63
The Cardinals are fuqqin useless!
Comment
Sawsi
SBR High Roller
01-29-10
182
#64
I love the Soriano hate on the first page and the love on the second. You all know what you are going to get from him (a free swinging power bat).
Comment
gshock1
SBR Hall of Famer
12-04-09
5366
#65
Come on Cubs, lets tack on 8 runs here!
Comment
No coincidences
SBR Aristocracy
01-18-10
76300
#66
Originally posted by BillAccpetor
Sorry, but which sources did you check? IMO the people, squares were hitting the OVER...
52% of the public was on the under at my book.
Total went from 11 to juiced at 12 late.
07/23/10 10:26:23 AM -151 11o -113 (Open)
07/23/10 10:36:24 AM -151 11.5 -105
07/23/10 11:16:23 AM -154 11.5 -105
07/23/10 12:06:23 PM -157 11.5 -105
07/23/10 12:56:23 PM -160 11.5o -109
07/23/10 1:06:24 PM -160 11.5o -116
07/23/10 1:26:23 PM -160 11.5o -117
07/23/10 1:36:23 PM -160 11.5o -125
07/23/10 1:56:24 PM -160 11.5o -129
07/23/10 2:06:23 PM -163 12o -121
07/23/10 2:16:23 PM -163 12o -125
Comment
gshock1
SBR Hall of Famer
12-04-09
5366
#67
Thanks Supan you a$$. Score #5!!!
Comment
Cappinpicks
SBR Posting Legend
03-11-10
14986
#68
oh yeah because late juice means the players will get good wood on every other pitch
Comment
BillAccpetor
SBR Wise Guy
02-07-09
790
#69
Under is 4-0 in Wells' last 4 starts on grass.
Under is 4-0 in Wells' last 4 starts overall.
Under is 4-0 in Wells' last 4 home starts.
Under is 8-1 in Wells' last 9 starts vs. a team with a winning record.
Under is 6-1 in Wells' last 7 starts when their opponent scores 2 runs or less in their previous game.
Enough...
Under is 29-14-4 in Cubs last 47 vs. a team with a winning record.
Comment
babyanni
SBR MVP
09-23-09
1780
#70
look at these clowns foul pop at homeplate not even close