STL/MIL was my last total play EVER

peterw111 · 06-05-10, 06:13 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Never again. I don't care if a game has a total set at 2, or 20 -- I'm done.

NO MORE..................

ABSOLUETLY NO OVER/UNDERS EVER EVER EVER............AGAIN....

DON'T TRY TO TALK ME OUT OF IT.........ITS FINAL

............................

............................

WELL OK then.....................At least for the rest of the day......................

ITS A VICIOUS CIRCLE..................

No coincidences · 06-05-10, 06:14 PM

Originally posted by peterw111

NO MORE..................

ABSOLUETLY NO OVER/UNDERS EVER EVER EVER............AGAIN....

DON'T TRY TO TALK ME OUT OF IT.........ITS FINAL

............................

............................

WELL OK then.....................At least for the rest of the day......................

ITS A VICIOUS CIRCLE..................

Not anymore.

Had the over in Texas and St. Louis.

Finished.

peterw111 · 06-05-10, 06:22 PM

On a serious note NC

With regards to Over/Unders in MLB...

Whilst I do know that ALL GAMES vary but statistically is it safer to go under or over on ALL GAMES and still make a profit or are we just playing with fire.....

I took the early games and went under in both.... 2-0 but was I really right?????

domz248 · 06-05-10, 06:26 PM

we still have a chance we need 2 runs from MIL

peterw111 · 06-05-10, 06:29 PM

Originally posted by domz248

we still have a chance we need 2 runs from MIL

Even 1 run each will get it OVER.......................

mandude · 06-05-10, 06:30 PM

Have faith brother. Yes it doesnt look good at the moment but it's baseball. Crazy shit happens all the time. We also have the Poo Crews bullpen in our favor as well.

No coincidences · 06-05-10, 06:31 PM

Originally posted by peterw111

Even 1 run each will get it OVER.......................

Nope -- it's conveniently 9.5.

peterw111 · 06-05-10, 06:32 PM

Originally posted by No coincidences

Nope -- it's conveniently 9.5.

No_c 4 + 4 +1 +1 =10.........You may be stressing out to much.......LIE DOWN YOUNG MAN......

ThaTopMoron · 06-05-10, 06:46 PM

I like unders more than overs

peterw111 · 06-05-10, 06:48 PM

Originally posted by ThaTopMoron

I like unders more than overs

Thanks TTM..................................I'm with U

ThaTopMoron · 06-05-10, 06:50 PM

Originally posted by peterw111

Thanks TTM..................................I'm with U

ya... i had Texas Tampa over but it was mixed into some parlays so no big loss at all

I jumped all over the CLE CWS under

No coincidences · 06-05-10, 06:53 PM

Originally posted by peterw111

No_c 4 + 4 +1 +1 =10.........You may be stressing out to much.......LIE DOWN YOUNG MAN......

Didn't see the "each."

Well, in any event, it didn't go over. Shock.

No coincidences · 06-05-10, 06:56 PM

What makes it even worse are the total leans I ignored:

CLE-CHW under
PHI-SD over
DET-KC under
FLA-NYM over
BOS-BAL under

I have a feeling there will be four winners from that group.

Shortstop · 06-05-10, 07:11 PM

Those 9.5 Overs are the devil a lot of times!

lakerboy · 06-05-10, 07:38 PM

Always play under on 9.5. 5-4 scores are common or 6-3.

Patrick Adams · 06-05-10, 07:52 PM

Always Under 9.5 sounds right to me...what number would you guys say is a good Always over number?

No coincidences · 06-06-10, 12:03 AM

Forgot I had locked in the ATL/LAD under earlier in the day -- a fitting conclusion!

jboy4 · 06-06-10, 12:11 AM

Just bad luck. Better luck tomorrow.

No coincidences · 06-06-10, 12:20 AM

Originally posted by jboy4

Just bad luck. Better luck tomorrow.

Not for me on totals, there isn't.

PAULYPOKER · 06-06-10, 12:25 AM

Hey Coin I pulled one of your stunts today,, I went 3-1 and still was in the negative today

shari91 · 06-06-10, 12:25 AM

Originally posted by lakerboy

Always play under on 9.5. 5-4 scores are common or 6-3.

That's actually scarily true. 9.5's do seem to go under the majority of the time. Although I'm always a lot more nervous when I take an under - your bet can get blown out of the water in the first 2 innings whereas with an over you can always still hope for a surge late in the game when the pens come in.

No coincidences · 06-06-10, 12:28 AM

Originally posted by shari91

That's actually scarily true. 9.5's do seem to go under the majority of the time. Although I'm always a lot more nervous when I take an under - your bet can get blown out of the water in the first 2 innings whereas with an over you can always still hope for a surge late in the game when the pens come in.

Like tonight's Boston/Baltimore game.

Talk about a fluke over -- 2-0 in the 9th, and it ends up 8-2.

Nats' Fan · 06-06-10, 12:29 AM

No coincidences: I know I'm new here but I'd like to give you a piece of advice on totals. This year, play unders on Padres games and Nats games. Play overs at Texas(rangers) stadium. When the Yanks play the Red Sox, play the over. That's just something I've stuck by this year. Also I'm playing the under in tomorrows Col/Arizona game (8.5) I don't mean to tell you your business. Just something I've been winning with this year. GL.

No coincidences · 06-06-10, 12:44 AM

Originally posted by Nats' Fan

No coincidences: I know I'm new here but I'd like to give you a piece of advice on totals. This year, play unders on Padres games and Nats games. Play overs at Texas(rangers) stadium. When the Yanks play the Red Sox, play the over. That's just something I've stuck by this year. Also I'm playing the under in tomorrows Col/Arizona game (8.5) I don't mean to tell you your business. Just something I've been winning with this year. GL.

I won't because I'm done, but thanks for the advice anyway.