John morrison 2010 mlb system

**el jefe** · 08-01-10, 01:07 AM

guy at freaksforum hit over 70% for the month of july.

**alexy** · 08-01-10, 01:46 AM

August

AUGUST WILL BE CRUCIAL TO RECOVER LOSES. COMMENTS AND ADVISE FOR EACH GAME WILL BE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PARTICIPANTS IN THIS THREAD. THANKS TO ALL YOU

**dukipl** · 08-01-10, 05:18 AM

[b bet] win on mets. Lets hope August will have only wins.

**Betting-Eye** · 08-01-10, 07:58 AM

Yes, I so hope so. Strange how now the losses are happening compared to the years before that have had no losses under the current system. Of course we had the losses but under a different rule criteria. I know what you are thinking but maybe this means good news for us now. Do I dare think that?

**hockey1980** · 08-01-10, 09:23 AM

Take the win boys (and ladies)....Its been a rough season...

**Cyril** · 08-01-10, 11:07 AM

I agree million2one. We should add new filters, and go heavy on those games that fall under them. For example, I was pretty big on TOR and NYM as I stated before the series started, and the rewards were good. I mostly took into consideration the filter with the RPIs, that their RPIs (on both TOR and NYM) were way bigger than their opponents.

**pollito** · 08-01-10, 11:11 AM

No plays until Friday August 6th.

**krzychu78** · 08-01-10, 01:02 PM

What about Kansas tomorrow? RPI difference between Kansas and Oakland is 0.012 for today.

**million2one** · 08-01-10, 04:44 PM

Thanks for the input Cyril, I suppose a large RPI differential is what I am mainly looking for as well.

Everybody hone in on the Phillies next Friday, should be a good play, only thing now is that Ryan Howard got hurt today and a possibility of being placed on the DL. So they could possibly be without Howard and Utley is still out, so I guess that series is up in the air at this point.

**HE.man** · 08-01-10, 11:16 PM

well Kansas is an official A bet, runline , for today... bol !

**knugen** · 08-02-10, 01:11 AM

I'm thinking about doing à reverse bet on the kansas bet and bet oakland, what do u guys think?

**Betting-Eye** · 08-02-10, 03:02 AM

Reverse bet? We either follow the system or we dont. If Kansas cover the bet what then? As long as we win in the series then its ok right? I am thinking that morrison cant afford to drop another series so does that mean we be ok from now?
Its tempting doing the under and over bets or switching sides but arent we going against the stats? Will it lose in the end that way?

**xgame** · 08-02-10, 03:14 AM

Originally posted by knugen

I'm thinking about doing à reverse bet on the kansas bet and bet oakland, what do u guys think?

i think only reverse that going on c bet. not a b bet.

**dukipl** · 08-02-10, 03:52 AM

So Kansas it will be

**knugen** · 08-02-10, 04:37 AM

And what are the odds on runline , decimal odds?

**krzychu78** · 08-02-10, 04:41 AM

Kansas +1.5 1.752 at pinnacle

**Kev the Brit** · 08-02-10, 07:27 AM

Extracted from an e-mail from JM to his subscribers on Jul 9:

We must keep in mind that under no circumstances should a wager be made when the RPI difference between two teams is greater than .15. Going forward, it's important to walk away from a betting series if the RPI difference between two teams become greater than the .15 limit during any time within the series!

Good advice, John, except it was a day or so late ! At the outset of that series, on the morning of Tue Jul 6, the RPI difference between the Pirates and the Astros was 0.012. The difference then increased to 0.015 over the A and B bets, thus taking the series out of the limits. I printed them out every day.

Lets look at the latest series that JM has identified for us to risk our money on, with a chase on KC Royals starting tonight:

Today, the RPIs are:
Athletics 0.499
Royals 0.487.

The Athletics are 0.012 higher than the Royals.

Sound familiar?

I strongly recommend that we DO NOT PLAY KC ROYALS this week. They might win one of the 3 bets, but its just too risky. I'm really surprised that JM has identified this series as a system bet. Its a stupid thing to do.

Regards
Kev the Sage (maybe)

**Casper TFG** · 08-02-10, 08:27 AM

Here's to the hope that he knows what he is doing!

**hockey1980** · 08-02-10, 09:51 AM

Kev the Brit....I am in agreement with you on the KC/Oak series.... If KC wins one of the 3 games, it is possible,.... could KC also be sweeped very possible....
In the "A" game the RL+1.5 is the play...
For me i will wait till later today if i place a wager (juice is higher then i like at present)...ROI with money management...
I have been playing JM MLB chase for 3 years...todays RPI .012 is below the min.015...This series could be a trap... (gut feeling tells me to pass on this series or play reverse) BOL

**rickbo528** · 08-02-10, 11:12 AM

Originally posted by Casper TFG

Here's to the hope that he knows what he is doing!

You must be hoping Obama knows what he is doing too! Morrison knows what he is doing by getting people to throw money at a bad team. Then after the A bet loses or maybe the B bet loses he will say drop the series. Of course it won't count as an official loss.

But you will have lost money. Like the Angels last week. He says it was a push since a last minute pitching change by the Angels cancelled the bet. But you lost big money on that push didn't you. No matter how you slice it this system has 3 LOSSES!!!

I've played it before but it can no longer be relied on. You will throw money away if you continue to blindly follow it. I will not play it. If a game I like happens to be a JM game so be it, I will play it. But never chase especially all the way to a C bet where you might be wagering $1200 to win $100. The magic of his system somehow always pulling out a C bet are gone. This system is DONE.

**stevex** · 08-02-10, 11:26 AM

I wouldn't say the system is done. You can still profit from this system IF you pick and choose the right series to play. As stated before (if you want) you can just add a couple more filters by first making sure the team you're betting on is playing and home and by making sure the team you're wagering on has a BETTER RPI than the team they're playing against. Might be less plays, but at least you won't lose money or be in the negative. So for example the Royals - Oakland series you would pass on because the KC RPI is .012 less than the A's, not MORE. I'm personally goin to use the system for the rest of the year (as well as Baseball Crusher) but make sure I don't use a lot of my bankroll. I'm really hoping this upcoming Basketball season isn't as bad as this baseball year has been for his system.

stevex

**doin** · 08-02-10, 11:34 AM

Reading the threads, we really make an Athletics bet sound close to 100% choice!

**million2one** · 08-02-10, 12:02 PM

Sound advice here from some of these posters, I am glad to see the majority of people are wise when playing this system. Thank you to all those who are posting plays and giving solid advice for some of the newer players.

Oh yeah and KC is well under a .480 win percentage, remember when he had this as a filter a few years back, what ever happened to that filter, the guy makes filters and then comes up with a new system every year so you will never have any accurate back testing.

**jphil** · 08-02-10, 01:26 PM

Originally posted by million2one

Sound advice here from some of these posters, I am glad to see the majority of people are wise when playing this system. Thank you to all those who are posting plays and giving solid advice for some of the newer players.

Oh yeah and KC is well under a .480 win percentage, remember when he had this as a filter a few years back, what ever happened to that filter, the guy makes filters and then comes up with a new system every year so you will never have any accurate back testing.

yeah, i remember.

kc doesn't fit the criteria of his old sys. either, so it was a no brainer decision in my case.

on paper oak. does look a little better, but definately not worth the ag.

had we stuck w/ the old rpi(.010), we wouldn't have 3 losses this season.

**jphil** · 08-02-10, 01:32 PM

Originally posted by stevex

I wouldn't say the system is done. You can still profit from this system IF you pick and choose the right series to play. As stated before (if you want) you can just add a couple more filters by first making sure the team you're betting on is playing and home and by making sure the team you're wagering on has a BETTER RPI than the team they're playing against. Might be less plays, but at least you won't lose money or be in the negative. So for example the Royals - Oakland series you would pass on because the KC RPI is .012 less than the A's, not MORE. I'm personally goin to use the system for the rest of the year (as well as Baseball Crusher) but make sure I don't use a lot of my bankroll. I'm really hoping this upcoming Basketball season isn't as bad as this baseball year has been for his system.

stevex

I picked a bad wk. to start w/ CRUSHER. he was at a 8 win streak when i started on fri. 3 losses since. Ya def. have to even capp the cappers.

**jphil** · 08-02-10, 01:37 PM

anyone catch this?

SBR Forum - Sports Betting Talk - Sportsbook Review Forum

http://forum.sbrforum.com/service-plays/590795-any-other-system-betting-than-jm.html

Sports betting and handicapping forum: discuss picks, odds, and predictions for upcoming games and results on latest bets.

**pollito** · 08-02-10, 01:56 PM

If anyone is betting Kansas tonight be carefull...it might fall out of the RPI difference, I will not play it myself.

GL

**DustyDiamond** · 08-02-10, 03:16 PM

Morrison followers, have your two losses broke the bank?

**Cyril** · 08-02-10, 06:50 PM

Nicely said Kev the Brit. If you decide to stick with the new rule (after the PIT loss), you should not play KC Royals. You'll most probably have the same scenario as the PIT loss not long ago.

The funny or sad part here is, you might win or lose here but JM is a winner in both cases. If KC Royals win one OR if they lose all three games he is a winner. Why ?
Because if they win on one of the three games (lets say he lose on the A bet because the difference is 0.12), he'll count it as a win not taking the new rule in consideration, and if they lose all three games he'll take the new rule into consideration, that means in either cases no loss to his records.

If that loss with PIT didn't happened, he wasn't going to mention this new rule. He was not planning to, but he had to find out how is he going to cover up this loss, so he came up with this.
After everybody who followed his system lost, he comes up with a new rule, and magically there is no system loss, although he sent emails on every single A, B and C bet saying us to bet on them. Soon after he deleted the pages (with A,B, C bets on PIT), sent to us in the emails. According to his records this never happened.

**stevex** · 08-02-10, 07:04 PM

Definetly going to be very selective the rest of the way, specially with the RPI difference. Will always make plays on a team that have a better RPI, but if it's close.....staying away (IE: Royals tonight).

stevex

**alexy** · 08-03-10, 01:56 AM

Your prediction

The serie started as you said. Best if stay away. Thank you pollito

Originally posted by pollito

if anyone is betting kansas tonight be carefull...it might fall out of the rpi difference, i will not play it myself.

Gl

**dukipl** · 08-03-10, 04:38 AM

For any risk players:
Kansas [b bet] vs. Oakland -> RL play odd: 1,74@pinnacle
The rpi difference is .013 so its still official alright
GL

**pollito** · 08-03-10, 09:38 AM

Once again: betting on Kansas in NOT safe...wait until the next series:
LA Angels @ Detroit and Philadelphia vs. NY Mets (both on Friday 8/6) there's no need to risk your money in this kind of games, if you want action in the mean time, follow Teddy Covers, Power Play Wins or BB Crusher on a daily basis and be selective with JM plays...
GL

**Betting-Eye** · 08-03-10, 09:57 AM

But guys... Either we are faithful in his system or we are not. His record has only been bad this season. Can it get even worse? These odds win all the time. I had 2 bets at 1.46 and 1.54 and both lost. So.... with the right RPI difference a win in 3 should be possible right?

**pollito** · 08-03-10, 11:01 AM

IMAO It's much better and smarter to be selective.