Nats to win 7 in a row?

**Negataur** · 08-06-07, 04:15 PM

Going with SF RL myself.

Lincecum has been on fire.

**MonkeyF0cker** · 08-06-07, 04:18 PM

So have the Nats.

**EaglesPhan36** · 08-06-07, 04:44 PM

SF .241 vs. lefties. Maybe too much hoopla for Bonds. I'll probably play this if I win a wager or two earlier in the night.

**LT Profits** · 08-06-07, 05:27 PM

Nats for me. Giants offense not much outside of Steroid Boy, and Washington bullpen infinitely better. Only concern is Nats travel factor, but this price makes up for that IMO.

**bigboydan** · 08-06-07, 05:31 PM

I like the Nats tonight myself guys.

**ShamsWoof10** · 08-06-07, 06:16 PM

This might be "sauce for the goose" for me... I might have to take SF... If I win a few before that I'll take SF... So far only have one play TB RL

**Negataur** · 08-06-07, 06:27 PM

NATS have been on fire as well. But its been at HOME, vs CIN and STL. In each of those series, the visitors threw 1 legit ACE in Wainwright, and the just barely beat STL yesterday.

SF has been on the West coast all week, and the HR chase is over. I really think that SF plays this homestand very well, and it starts with a big one tonight.

Is this the first time for WAS on ESPN national TV?

GL on whichever play you make tonight.

**curious** · 08-06-07, 08:29 PM

I took San Fran as a red alert play. Red alert for me is my maximum bet.

**MonkeyF0cker** · 08-06-07, 11:10 PM

Tie game, top of 6, bases loaded, 2 outs, and the Nats leave in Lannan to hit. WTF!!!!!

**MonkeyF0cker** · 08-06-07, 11:11 PM

If he gives up a run this inning, I'm gonna be really pissed.

**pat venditto** · 08-06-07, 11:26 PM

I dont care who wins... i want 6 more runs!

**betplom** · 08-06-07, 11:26 PM

Originally posted by curious

I took San Fran as a red alert play. Red alert for me is my maximum bet.

Here's an original idea:
If a "Red Alert Play" is your maximum bet, why not just call the play:

"my maximum bet" play?

Code names are so old school, like "Get Smart"

**curious** · 08-06-07, 11:29 PM

Originally posted by betplom

Here's an original idea:
If a "Red Alert Play" is your maximum bet, why not just call the play:

"my maximum bet" play?

Code names are so old school, like "Get Smart"

because I like red alert play if that is okay with you.

**betplom** · 08-06-07, 11:36 PM

Perfectly fine with me, you can call it anything you want, but it sounds like something a geeky teenager would say.

Personally, I like to fade any red alert or lock play that is posted.

I like to call it the "Red Alert Fade"

A "Red Alert Fade" is my maximum play against a post that starts with the words "lock" or "red alert play"

knock yourself out.

**ShamsWoof10** · 08-06-07, 11:40 PM

You know I have always wondered why people use code names for a lot of things... I coached with two different staffs and one used terms easy to understand and the other used code names for words easy to understand... What the hell for I always asked..? Twins Left & Twins Right are 2 recievers to the left or right and Trips Left & Right is of course 3 recievers... but the other staff would use "Eagle & Falcon" for Twins Left & Twins Right... This one is even worse.. position coaches that coached the DB's used "INK" for the "In Technique" and "Oink" for the "outside technique".. They actually wondered why the kids got confused.. WTF.? Not to mention it makes no sense to use them but they were old school for sure and have old school programming no question there...

**ShamsWoof10** · 08-06-07, 11:45 PM

Originally posted by betplom

Perfectly fine with me, you can call it anything you want, but it sounds like something a geeky teenager would say.

Personally, I like to fade any red alert or lock play that is posted.

I like to call it the "Red Alert Fade"

A "Red Alert Fade" is my maximum play against a post that starts with the words "lock" or "red alert play"

knock yourself out.

Hey guys eeeeeasy... not to mention there's only room for one as*hole in here ....and that's meeeee!!

and my favorite.

This is great stuff SBR

**curious** · 08-06-07, 11:45 PM

Originally posted by betplom

Perfectly fine with me, you can call it anything you want, but it sounds like something a geeky teenager would say.

Personally, I like to fade any red alert or lock play that is posted.

I like to call it the "Red Alert Fade"

A "Red Alert Fade" is my maximum play against a post that starts with the words "lock" or "red alert play"

knock yourself out.

Well, I've published 3 red alert plays since I started posting in here. So far they are 2-0 with 1 pending. So, by all means please fade my picks.

**EaglesPhan36** · 08-06-07, 11:47 PM

Go Nats!

**curious** · 08-06-07, 11:52 PM

damn, I bet the RL on the SF Fags. So, they will score 1 run in the bottom of the 9th.

**LUNT101** · 08-06-07, 11:54 PM

i have the SF ML to finish out a parlay! Get this walkoff!

**curious** · 08-06-07, 11:56 PM

Originally posted by LUNT101

i have the SF ML to finish out a parlay! Get this walkoff!

Can it be a walkoff with a man on base please?

**EaglesPhan36** · 08-07-07, 12:07 AM

Da Meat Hook! Word.

**betplom** · 08-07-07, 12:09 AM

Originally posted by ShamsWoof10

Hey guys eeeeeasy... not to mention there's only room for one as*hole in here ....and that's meeeee!!

This is great stuff SBR

You are right, my apologies Sham, there's only room for one & you're doing a helluva job as the resident ass*ole! LOL.

**ShamsWoof10** · 08-07-07, 12:19 AM

Originally posted by betplom

You are right, my apologies Sham, there's only room for one & you're doing a helluva job as the resident ass*ole! LOL.

you say the nicest things

These things are great...
This is going to be my signature from now on... it was born on this post...

**EaglesPhan36** · 08-07-07, 12:22 AM

Heineous bullpens strike again.

**betplom** · 08-07-07, 12:25 AM

Originally posted by EaglesPhan36

Heineous bullpens strike again.

Eagles:

Why are you keeping this thread "on topic"? Can't you see it's been F8cked by some of us?

Oh yeah, I took the over as well, not looking good.

Come on Nats, score 4 more (at least).

**ShamsWoof10** · 08-07-07, 12:27 AM

Anyone notice anything odd here..? hahahaha

Mon, 8/6/07 10:00 PM MLB Baseball
Parlay Wager: Washington ( J Lannan must start) vs. T Lincecum (must start) PK [+188] (Entire Game)
Risk: 22.00 Pays: 98.96 Status: WIN
San Francisco vs. Washington to be held on Mon, 8/6 at 10:15 PM $98.96

Mon, 8/6/07 10:00 PM MLB Baseball
Parlay Wager: Los Angeles Angels (Jer Weaver must start) vs. Schilling (must start) PK [-110] (Entire Game)
Risk: 22.00 Pays: 98.96 Status: WIN
Los Angeles Angels vs. Boston to be held on Mon, 8/6 at 10:05 PM $98.96

**BatemanPatrickl** · 08-07-07, 06:40 AM

Had the Giants RL...

**curious** · 08-07-07, 06:56 AM

Originally posted by BatemanPatrickl

Had the Giants RL...

Why oh why did I break one of my rules and take a home team on the RL. I NEVER do that, for obvious reasons. Oh well, ended up 4-1 on the day and made $60 wooo hooo. I'm not betting on the San Fran fags any more. And, as always no offense to all the fags in the forum.