I do hate low volume cards though and today looks like another one.
Comment
sosawestbrook
SBR MVP
12-10-16
3135
#5
Solid work LT good luck today
What are your thoughts on the young Cards pitcher Dakota Hudson?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#6
Originally posted by sosawestbrook
Solid work LT good luck today
What are your thoughts on the young Cards pitcher Dakota Hudson?
I don't like him at all, horrific 6.41/4.05 K/BB per 9 ratio so not need to dig any further. I may actually be overrating him at 20% below average, but cutting him slack due to small sample size.
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#7
Originally posted by LT Profits
I don't like him at all, horrific 6.41/4.05 K/BB per 9 ratio so not need to dig any further. I may actually be overrating him at 20% below average, but cutting him slack due to small sample size.
I should add that his great groundball rate is keeping Hudson from being totally atrocious.
Comment
sosawestbrook
SBR MVP
12-10-16
3135
#8
what is considered ELITE k/bb? above 5?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#9
5 is super elite, ratio above 3 would rank around top 50 in baseball right now.
Comment
snider
SBR Sharp
03-25-17
309
#10
Where do you need to be on the Rangers and White Sox?
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#11
Originally posted by snider
Where do you need to be on the Rangers and White Sox?
I only have Texas 58% (-138), I think the opportunity there was actually with KC early on.
And I would not go near the White Sox as I have pitching mismatch with Cleveland 67% (-203).
Comment
eaglesfan371
SBR MVP
01-08-19
4079
#12
Originally posted by LT Profits
I don't like him at all, horrific 6.41/4.05 K/BB per 9 ratio so not need to dig any further. I may actually be overrating him at 20% below average, but cutting him slack due to small sample size.
THIS IS WHY IM SO ANGRY LT. I FADED CARDINALS LAST TIME THIS HUDSON FUK WAS PITCHING. His velocity dropped and his stats SUCK. I had done all my research used the advanced stats like you, made my largest bet of the year on the fukkin braves. Stupid fukking mlb always lose. The other guy, I forget his name, was a true sub 2 ERA with good strike to ball ratio, 3 xFIP while Hudson 5+ and just Atlanta pitcher beautiful stats all around.
Fukking 8th inning they imploded and I lost. LT I despise baseball. Games that on paper look like should win, fukking lose every time. Pitchers be 5-0 and I’m their first loss. Feel fukking cursed. Sorry but the Atlanta play was a HUGE play for me at -110 over the weekend. 1.5k
Comment
eaglesfan371
SBR MVP
01-08-19
4079
#13
Felt like goddamn LT that day. Looked at K/BB, xFIP, strike to ball ratio, groundball/flyball ratio, velocity recent and past years, the whole works. Thought I had capped the game beautifully that day. 0-2 SO ANGERING. On vacation too to make matters worse!
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#14
Again, Angels No Action due to Pitching Change and again, I re-bet them at new price.
1 MLB Play Thursday
Angels +105 (Heritage)
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#15
AGAIN Re-Bet Angels
SECOND Pitching Change for Angels as they are now using opener, so another No Action and I again re-bet at new price.
1 MLB Play Thursday
Angels +103 (Heritage)
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#16
1 Last MLB Addition
2 MLB Plays Thursday
Pirates +113 (Heritage)
Angels +103 (Heritage)
Comment
eaglesfan371
SBR MVP
01-08-19
4079
#17
LT have you ever "gambled" in the past year? Meaning, made a bet that your model did not agree with because you thought differently and were extremely confident about some alternative, non quantitative factor?
Comment
NBAtony
SBR High Roller
11-28-17
169
#18
Originally posted by LT Profits
2 MLB Plays Thursday
Pirates +113 (Heritage)
Angels +103 (Heritage)
waiting for this play all day.. on 1H as well...bucccoooos
Comment
LT Profits
SBR Aristocracy
10-27-06
90963
#19
Originally posted by eaglesfan371
LT have you ever "gambled" in the past year? Meaning, made a bet that your model did not agree with because you thought differently and were extremely confident about some alternative, non quantitative factor?