2014 MLB Win Totals

[derekjetr02]

From Atlantis Casino (Reno)

Arizona D'Backs	81	wins
Atlanta Braves	86.5	wins
Baltimore Orioles	80.5	wins
Boston Red Sox	87.5	wins
Chicago Cubs	65.5	wins
Chicago White Sox	76.5	wins
Cincinnati Reds	87.5	wins
Cleveland Indians	82.5	wins
Colorado Rockies	76.5	wins
Detroit Tigers	91.5	wins
Houston Astros	57.5	wins
Kansas City Royals	85.5	wins
LA of Anaheim	84.5	wins
Los Angeles Dodgers	92.5	wins
Miami Marlins	66.5	wins
Milwaukee Brewers	78.5	wins
Minnesota Twins	65.5	wins
New York Mets	71.5	wins
New York Yankees	83.5	wins
Oakland Athletics	86.5	wins
Philadelphia Phillies	78	wins
Pittsburgh Pirates	86.5	wins
San Diego Padres	76.5	wins
San Francisco Giants	86.5	wins
Seattle Mariners	81.5	wins
St. Louis Cardinals	90.5	wins
Tampa Bay Rays	88.5	wins
Texas Rangers	86.5	wins
Toronto Blue Jays	77.5	wins
Washington Nationals	90.5	wins

[easyliving]

yankees over and balty under easiest bets on the board

[crackerjack]

yankees over and balty under easiest bets on the board

All these numbers seem a little low. Last year there were 11 teams that won 90 or more games. Yankees won 85 and seem to have improved. At first glance I like Arizona, Atlanta, Seattle, White Sox, NYY and LAA all over. Maybe Toronto.

[EXhoosier10]

All these numbers seem a little low. Last year there were 11 teams that won 90 or more games. Yankees won 85 and seem to have improved. At first glance I like Arizona, Atlanta, Seattle, White Sox, NYY and LAA all over. Maybe Toronto.

Only maybe 1 team a year wins 100 games. So setting a win total of 94+ is going to get uneven action on the under.

[crackerjack]

Only maybe 1 team a year wins 100 games. So setting a win total of 94+ is going to get uneven action on the under.

You missed my point maybe... No one is talking about a 100 team winner. Only two totals set at 91 or higher but 11 teams reached that mark last year. Just seems like picking 4 great teams and taking the over would produce winners...

[EXhoosier10]

You missed my point maybe... No one is talking about a 100 team winner. Only two totals set at 91 or higher but 11 teams reached that mark last year. Just seems like picking 4 great teams and taking the over would produce winners...

You're probably right. Good idea.

[easyliving]

astros total has spiked up to 62.5 any reason why?

[crackerjack]

astros total has spiked up to 62.5 any reason why?

Some rich Texas oil tycoon dropped a buttload of cash on the over? Houston looks to be improved this year. And look at all the one run losses they had last year...in the 20s iirc. They will hit 60+ wins...

[A4K]

Let me ask you guys a question, and I mean no disrespect....

Why on Earth to people bet these types of season long props?

1. The book holds your money for half the year.
2. A few key injuries and you are sunk.
3. I really like numbering things.

[crackerjack]

Let me ask you guys a question, and I mean no disrespect....

Why on Earth to people bet these types of season long props?

1. The book holds your money for half the year.
2. A few key injuries and you are sunk.
3. I really like numbering things.

So you still have some action come June when you go bust...

[A4K]

Never thought of that. Good answer. Who you leanin' towards?

[TakingVegasMoney]

My book offers Yankees at O/U 87.5 -- I think 83.5 is a steal

[benjy]

Blue Jays are 80.5 at Pinny now. Even with the movement I think the over is a great bet. If I didn't care that my betting cash would be tied up all summer I'd hit this relatively hard.

Yankees are at 87. With the exception of their OF they are either ancient or question marks. I'll disagree with most of the above posts and like the under here (though the total is very different).

[THE HITMAN]

Just my thoughts:
1) I keep the $ in there for foots anyway, so letting(some of) it "work" isn't a problem.
2) Key injuries help, not hurt if you play unders.