18.09.2013
S1
(B Bet) NYY: Yankees 2,05 0,952u | Yankees 1,952 2,05u
S2
(A Bet) LAA: LA Angels 2,39 0,719u
S1
(B Bet) NYY: Yankees 2,05 0,952u | Yankees 1,952 2,05u
S2
(A Bet) LAA: LA Angels 2,39 0,719u
-
Comment -
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 45 | L 7 (-50,053 units)
S3: W 219 | L 10 (-78,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 2 (+22,995 units)
pending:
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, D Bet on next start @home
- S1 Pit fade, C Bet on 23.09.2013
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
19.09.2013
S3
(A Bet) Hou fade: Cleveland 1,442 2,26uComment -
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 45 | L 7 (-50,053 units)
S3: W 220 | L 10 (-77,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 2 (+22,995 units)
pending:
- P3 C.Sabathia fade, D Bet on next start @home
- S1 Pit fade, C Bet on 23.09.2013
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
20.09.2013
S2
(A Bet) Ari fade: Colorado 1,763 1,31u
S3
(A Bet) Tor fade: Boston 1,465 2,15u
(A Bet) LAA: LA Angels - no line atm
(A Bet) NYY: Yankees 1,714 1,40u
P3
(D Bet) C.Sabathia fade: LAA 2,29 0,775u | Balt 2,21 1,467u | CHW 2,67 1,941u | SF 2,29 4,018u
potential plays:
- S3 cubs, if line <+100
- S3 SD, if line <+100Comment -
- S3 SD series added + LAA line.
20.09.2013
S2
(A Bet) Ari fade: Colorado 1,763 1,31u
S3
(A Bet) Tor fade: Boston 1,465 2,15u
(A Bet) LAA: LA Angels 1,80 1,25u
(A Bet) NYY: Yankees 1,714 1,40u
(A Bet) SD: San Diego 1,769 1,30u
P3
(D Bet) C.Sabathia fade: LAA 2,29 0,775u | Balt 2,21 1,467u | CHW 2,67 1,941u | SF 2,29 4,018u
potential plays:
- S3 cubs, if line <+100Comment -
- P3 C.Sabathia fade series lost = -8,201 units
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 46 | L 7 (-49,053 units)
S3: W 224 | L 10 (-73,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 3 (+14,794 units)
pending:
- S1 Pit fade, C Bet on 23.09.2013
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
21.09.2013
no plays todayComment -
Is anyone playing this system anymore? I stopped playing it awhile ago after it basically wiped out my whole account....just checking back in to see if it turned around at all and looks like it's only gotten worse. With all of that "back testing" I'm a bit surprised to see it do THIS bad. The NBA chase system didn't go very well, either.Comment -
23.09.2013
S2
(B Bet) Pit fade: Texas 1,73 1,37u | Cubs 2,19 1,992u
S3
(A Bet) Tex: Texas 1,382 2,62u
(A Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,437 2,29u
potential plays:
- S3 Det fade, if line +100 or more
- S3 Oak fade, if line +100 or more
Comment -
- S3 Oak fade series added.
23.09.2013
S2
(B Bet) Pit fade: Texas 1,73 1,37u | Cubs 2,19 1,992u
S3
(A Bet) Tex: Texas 1,382 2,62u
(A Bet) Cin: Cincinnati 1,437 2,29u
(A Bet) Oak fade: LA Angels 1,68 1,47u
potential plays:
- S3 Det fade, if line +100 or moreComment -
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 46 | L 7 (-49,053 units)
S3: W 226 | L 10 (-71,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 3 (+14,794 units)
pending:
- S1 Pit fade, C Bet on 24.09.2013
- S3 Oak fade, B Bet on 24.09.2013
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
24.09.2013
S2
(C Bet) Pit fade: Texas 1,73 1,37u | Cubs 2,19 1,992u | cubs 2,42 3,072u
S3
(B Bet) Oak fade: LA Angels 1,68 1,47u | LA Angels 2,04 2,375u
(A Bet) Balti: baltimore 1,621 1,61u
(A Bet) SF: San francisco 1,847 1,18u
potential plays:
- S3 TB fade, if line +100 or more
Comment -
I lost it all 2, but I still keep on checking in from time to time to see how Stiflers doing. Even though this season is defo the worst I've seen (and only the second in total) I can't help but hope that Stiffy's gonna pull something out of his hat. Boom! 1000 units in one game you say?! Awesome!
Comment -
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 46 | L 7 (-49,053 units)
S3: W 227 | L 10 (-70,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 3 (+14,794 units)
pending:
- S1 Pit fade, D Bet on 25.09.2013
- S3 Oak fade, C Bet on 25.09.2013
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
25.09.2013
S2
(D Bet) Pit fade: Texas 1,73 1,37u | Cubs 2,19 1,992u | cubs 2,42 3,072u | Cubs 2,54 4,827u
S3
(B Bet) Balti: baltimore 1,621 1,61u | Baltimore 1,658 3,967u
(B Bet) SF: San francisco 1,847 1,18u | San Francisco 1,77 2,831u
Comment -
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 47 | L 7 (-48,053 units)
S3: W 229 | L 10 (-68,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 3 (+14,794 units)
pending:
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
26.09.2013
S3
(A Bet) LAA fade: texas 1,595 1,68uComment -
Actually this whole concept has given me a good idea which has worked out nicely. Like Bridgejumper keep it simple. Identify HOT and COLD teams and ride the gravy train.Comment -
records:
S1: W 54 | L 2 (+17,46 units)
S2: W 47 | L 7 (-48,053 units)
S3: W 230 | L 10 (-67,875 units)
P1: W 24 | L 5 (-24,212 units)
P2: W 47 | L 4 (-42,195 units)
P3: W 53 | L 3 (+14,794 units)
pending:
________________________________________ _____________________________________
all rules and qualifying teams for every system can be found on post #1-3
Comment -
thats it for the season.Comment -
YEA baby. Ending on a winning note. :-) I wish I could have thought of a way bet against the system LOLComment -
its not your mistake stifler.this is what it is.this is what always is.there is no system to beat the house.
i can give you 1000 s of examples. one day the man goes 10 -0 @ nfl next week 5-1 every one jump on his plays.again he hits 6-2 than 5-1 than 0-10 1-7 2-6 1-8
i went to casino i saw black come 8 in roll i start to bet on red 10 when i lose i double the bet on red belive ore not black come 16 time back to back i lost 2430 dollar in chase i didnt have any money to chase for 17 th guest what again black .glad didnt have the money.so what im saying is.doesnt matter how much you study and take a not.that day will come and we will lose it all.all systems will work on paper.ore when you dont bet.when you start to bet $$$ than thats it.inceridible will happened .Comment -
she was winner 2 at the beginning .than she start to sale
can you belive her last week plays went 0-17 this is what it is bro.
Comment -
Stiff will you be doing the NBA chase this year?Comment -
Stifler you going to do a MLB Chase this year for 2014?Comment -
Damn that's a shame I loved the system but I don't blame you...you posted your system for two years and caught so much hate no point in posting it when all you'll get is negativity...thanks for the two years!Comment -
Stifler, have a little question.
Can you just say us what teams for systems did you choose for that year ?
I need to thank you for that all rules and about the systems all what you said by 2 years. I started your system this year for myself with some myself modifications.
Just curious is any team from my list compare with your choose
Comment -
for S1 im playing:
NYY (only W streaks), Det (only W), Hou (only L), oak (only W), Cubs (only L), Cin (only W), Pit (only L), Stl (only W), Col (only L), SD (only L)
for S2 im playing:
TB (only W), Atl (only W), NYM (only L), Pit, Stl (only W)
for S3 im playing:
NYY, TB, Bos, CHW, Det, Hou, Oak, Tex, Atl, Phil, Cubs, Cin, Milw, Pit, Stl, Col, SD, SF
im not playing the pitcher chase anymore + i have a new system, but im not going into detail here. And i may consider removing teams from the list when i feel those teams are well underperforming (e.g. like LAA last year)Comment -
I don't understand why you choose that teams, for example Detroit for S1 when in last 4 years they were a lost 1 or 2 series each year, but GL Stifler
Comment -
dunno what numbers u have, but Detroit is undefeated for the last 3 years on S1 overall and had 2 losses 2010. But those were coming from losing streaks. I just play them on W streaksComment -
Hi Stiffler;
I always followed your system and appreciated you sharing your hard work AT NO CHARGE to anyone. I understand that you don't owe anyone anything, but I hope that you will reconsider posting your plays. Maybe don't ge into posting the details of the system or answering 100 questions but perhaps just post the plays. There were a lot of good people that appreciated you posting and they are really the only ones who will suffer by losing the opportunity to follow your system. Remember, the hater's whole point to posting is to get you to go away. I've always found it best that if your act like thenegative posts aren't even there they WILL go away. The wort thing anyone can do is to feed into it by responding to these posts in order to stand up to Stiff. Also remember that there are a lot of immature kids on this site and we as adults need to take the high road and act like adults. Further, look at the top of this page and what do you see? Links to all the booking houses. Sites like this are in bed with these guys everyone. Aside from the kids I believe that there are haters solely here for the purpose to get good guys like Stiff to go away.
If Stiff decides to at least post the plays, NO ONE RESPOND TO ANY NEGATIVE POSTS!!!! Either way Stiffler, I appreciate that I had the opportunity to follow your system the last two years and if you should reconsider and post the plays this year I would appreciate it. If you don't, I completely understand and no hard feelings here my friend. Good luck to you either way brother!!!!Comment -
Jesus Christ, could I have had anymore typos in my last post???? In the first paragraph it is supposed to say "in order to stand up FOR Stiffler" no to stiffler. The rest I think you can figure out.
BTW, I would love to see you back in the NBA thread Stiffler. I'm not a huge baseball fan, but I followed your system and really loved following your NBA System!!!Comment -
Ouuch sorry Stiff, i forgot that you play S1 for home games and road games, not for all So you are correct.
But on the road detroit had no losses in S1 losing streaks from 2007
So we can play all streaks on the road, and only winning in home ;P
What you want Good luck for us !
Comment
