You declared how much value there was in today's underdogs, proceeding to name several winning bets.
What you claim to have said in this (above quoted) post is nothing like what you said or implied in your earlier post on which I commented. It could be what you meant to do, however. It makes perfect sense to me, but it's not what you said before at all.
Outside Grand Slams and end stages of 500+ tournaments, I would say you're likely correct.
From this post, I'd say you seem to understand "capping". From the one before, I would have said you don't.
What you claim to have said in this (above quoted) post is nothing like what you said or implied in your earlier post on which I commented. It could be what you meant to do, however. It makes perfect sense to me, but it's not what you said before at all.
Outside Grand Slams and end stages of 500+ tournaments, I would say you're likely correct.
From this post, I'd say you seem to understand "capping". From the one before, I would have said you don't.