I suggest you bet against Andy Murrray today 1:15pm

[Courtesywipe]

For those of you who have tailed my Tennis picks you may want to do so again today.

Marcell Granollers + 5 games (-120) over Andy Murray. Matter of fact I will probably throw a small wager on Granollers +525.

Granollers has lost to Murrary 4 out of 5 times but the win for Marcell came on the clay against Andy and the clay surface today will at the very least keep the match close which in turn will cash you in on your +5 games.

You can thank me later!!

CW

[Ted Sheckler]

Awww shucks, already on Murray -4.5 -140

[brodie]

murray is going to roll him. don't know about the game spread, but I'm laying the -650 for an easy win. also have it parlayed with nishi/rao for a close to even payout for less

ps granollers won on clay because murray retired after they split the first 2 sets. last time they played on clay (2014) murray beat him in straights by 6 games

[nspa87]

I hope granollers wins, but I'm banking on him peeling away at least 1 set.

[Snowball]

the win for Marcell came on the clay against Andy

that loss was a Challenger final in May, 2005, when Andy was just a week over 17 years old.

[kdawgy]

I think Murray will want to end this as quickly as possible today. I love fading heavy favorites, but here I'm going to pass.

[Courtesywipe]

I'm confident on my wager + 5 games. Good luck all.

[kdawgy]

Also, this is potentially a big letdown spot for Granollers after beating Monfils last round.

[bruceBRUCEbruce]

Andee might be in the best form of his career re: clay aside from 2011...

[Ted Sheckler]

that loss was a Challenger final in May, 2005, when Andy was just a week over 17 years old.

Hahahaha

[brodie]

Hahahaha

no there was a loss in 2013 rome where andy retired after taking the 2nd set . i'm assuming that's what he was referring to. challenger results should never be put into consideration for any tour match

[Ted Sheckler]

no there was a loss in 2013 rome where andy retired after taking the 2nd set . i'm assuming that's what he was referring to. challenger results should never be put into consideration for any tour match

That's like me saying "hey guys take Matt Hammill vs Anderson Silva this weekend, Matt Hammill beat Jon Jones"

Yes he has a win against Jon Jones, but it's because Jones illegally hit him. Leave out the important info to make your reasoning seem stronger.

[STAY STRONG]

Danger zone.

[Snowball]

Andy is thrashing Granola like a mouse-infested rag doll he found in the dumpster.

[badgerguy]

Thanks? Thanks for the beating.

[brodie]

That's like me saying "hey guys take Matt Hammill vs Anderson Silva this weekend, Matt Hammill beat Jon Jones"

Yes he has a win against Jon Jones, but it's because Jones illegally hit him. Leave out the important info to make your reasoning seem stronger.

first off, relax ted. It wasn't me that mentioned it in the first place i was just trying to clarify. Either way that isn't comparable because hamill was getting smashed, Granollers took a set off of andy then took him to a tiebreaker in the 2nd. not that mma would ever be comparable to tennis lol

[cryptocap]

brilliant Murray, poor milos

[nspa87]

someone call 911

[Ted Sheckler]

first off, relax ted. It wasn't me that mentioned it in the first place i was just trying to clarify. Either way that isn't comparable because hamill was getting smashed, Granollers took a set off of andy then took him to a tiebreaker in the 2nd. not that mma would ever be comparable to tennis lol

Relax? I was agreeing with you, and laughing that the OP left out the fact that Murray retired and that's why Granollers won. That's pretty important info when you're talking about a head to head match.

If you didn't see that Hamill/Jones match and just saw me say Hamill beat Jones and to take Hamill against XXXX next fight because he beat jones, that would be quite misleading, because I left out a very important note on the fight.

[cryptocap]

10/10 today