Theres no way they loser right? All they do is take commission and hold bets. Why aren't there more exchanges out in the market
andywend
SBR MVP
05-20-07
4805
#2
LazyMan,
Don't take any offense into my response but the chances are strong you have never started up your own business.
There are tons of start-up expenses and plenty of continuing operation expenses to deal with.
It takes quite a bit of time for any business to have a solid client base and betting exchanges aren't any different.
BetFair has the entire Non-U.S. market completely dominated and as long as that cancerous piece of legislation called the UIGEA is still on the books, I wouldn't count on too many exchanges opening up anytime soon for U.S. bettors.
The UIGEA needs to be repealed and everything changes.
Comment
Hareeba!
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-01-06
37283
#3
and as I understand it Matchbook lost a bundle to credit customers who stiffed them
Comment
Bill Dozer
www.twitter.com/BillDozer
07-12-05
10894
#4
Most bookmakers that fail don't lose bookmaking. They just don't make enough profit to cover their overhead. Often the biggest is marketing but there are servers, IT, CS, banking and programming. Matchbook likely had over a half million into their software before we ever saw it.
Books, especially exchanges, do need to market. Often you'd see book that don't have enough money hit the forums with huge bonuses. They essentially bonus players with other's deposits until the check their books and see they are down X amount if they paid everyone who is owed. When someone is slow-paid and people do start asking for their loot, the book closes.
Comment
oopfish
SBR Sharp
09-22-07
381
#5
i make WD will i see my money again?
Comment
Zak
SBR High Roller
10-20-10
102
#6
Fairly simple dynamic - commision, typically up to 5%, versus development costs and overhead and a ton of marketing. It works if you can reach a critical size, if not it fails.
Comment
Igetp2s
SBR MVP
05-21-07
1046
#7
You also have no idea if they are seeding the markets and basically bookmaking at very low margins. Like Matchbook is doing right now.
Comment
justonetime
SBR Sharp
11-17-09
297
#8
Originally posted by Bill Dozer
Most bookmakers that fail don't lose bookmaking. They just don't make enough profit to cover their overhead. Often the biggest is marketing but there are servers, IT, CS, banking and programming. Matchbook likely had over a half million into their software before we ever saw it.
Books, especially exchanges, do need to market. Often you'd see book that don't have enough money hit the forums with huge bonuses. They essentially bonus players with other's deposits until the check their books and see they are down X amount if they paid everyone who is owed. When someone is slow-paid and people do start asking for their loot, the book closes.
Does software really cost that much? Had no idea.
Comment
Hareeba!
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-01-06
37283
#9
Originally posted by justonetime
Does software really cost that much? Had no idea.
special purpose software for an exchange
hardly off the shelf stuff from your local PC store
Comment
HeeeHAWWWW
SBR Hall of Famer
06-13-08
5487
#10
They can't lose ............... if they can get to a critical size. As betdaq and matchbook showed, they get to a minimal size, but what we really need is a second betfair. I'm guessing what it'll take is a big gambling group willing to seed the markets fully, and it'll eventually attract enough business away from betfair.
Comment
Doug
SBR Hall of Famer
08-10-05
6324
#11
You also have no idea if they are seeding the markets and basically bookmaking at very low margins. Like Matchbook is doing right now.
Most bookmakers that fail don't lose bookmaking. They just don't make enough profit to cover their overhead. Often the biggest is marketing but there are servers, IT, CS, banking and programming. Matchbook likely had over a half million into their software before we ever saw it. Books, especially exchanges, do need to market. Often you'd see book that don't have enough money hit the forums with huge bonuses. They essentially bonus players with other's deposits until the check their books and see they are down X amount if they paid everyone who is owed. When someone is slow-paid and people do start asking for their loot, the book closes.
Solid post.
Don't forget employees, from IT to CS, then management want to get paid as well. With their margin so low they are more likely to fail than a regular book. IMO.
Comment
kkkkk
SBR Wise Guy
03-30-09
523
#14
an exchange can be threated like company offering services. so like every company in service sector they can go broke becose they also have costs that they need to cover - so reason is bad management. beside that most exchanges offer casino and arcade games so they are not pure exchanges dont forget that.
Comment
nenad
Restricted User
08-12-09
714
#15
your own mistake
Comment
thespeculator
SBR MVP
09-09-08
2999
#16
isn't the international version of betfair like a regular book, when you play a parlay it says you are betting against betfair international, i think it mentions that on the right hand side
Comment
dikefale
SBR MVP
09-20-10
1017
#17
Originally posted by thespeculator
isn't the international version of betfair like a regular book, when you play a parlay it says you are betting against betfair international, i think it mentions that on the right hand side
Yes it is,i just wanted to write this.
Comment
cyberinvestor
SBR MVP
04-30-10
1952
#18
I remember one of the big causes for loss was chargebacks.
Today is the tomorrow we worried about yesterday.
Comment
mikeanite
SBR Sharp
04-13-10
475
#19
Originally posted by cyberinvestor
I remember one of the big causes for loss was chargebacks.
if it is really the mean reason, they should ask for Docs before they even accept funds from customers.
Comment
ACoochy
SBR Posting Legend
08-19-09
13949
#20
Exchanges are beginning to find new ways to attract customers....One exchange gives me 7.3%pa BUT does charge 10% of your profit (note NOT initial deposit) when it comes to withdraw time....Still, its solid 4 what i use it for (arbs) and i feel good knowing that a exchange is offering me better ROI than what the local bank is able to...GL
Comment
Hareeba!
BARRELED IN @ SBR!
07-01-06
37283
#21
Originally posted by ACoochy
Exchanges are beginning to find new ways to attract customers....One exchange gives me 7.3%pa BUT does charge 10% of your profit (note NOT initial deposit) when it comes to withdraw time....Still, its solid 4 what i use it for (arbs) and i feel good knowing that a exchange is offering me better ROI than what the local bank is able to...GL
they pay interest on your money?
which exchange is this ?
Comment
ACoochy
SBR Posting Legend
08-19-09
13949
#22
Originally posted by Hareeba!
they pay interest on your money? which exchange is this ?
pm sent
Comment
Santo
SBR MVP
09-08-05
2957
#23
Originally posted by thespeculator
isn't the international version of betfair like a regular book, when you play a parlay it says you are betting against betfair international, i think it mentions that on the right hand side
I think this may be a legalese thing; Betfair match your bet against somebody else but claim to be the matching party for both in order to satisfy local legislation.
Comment
FourLengthsClear
SBR MVP
12-29-10
3808
#24
Originally posted by Santo
I think this may be a legalese thing; Betfair match your bet against somebody else but claim to be the matching party for both in order to satisfy local legislation.
I think he is referring to the "Multiples" section of Betfair which is for parlays and where Betfair does take the other side of your bet.
The odds are based on the exchange but with a 5% juice applied.
Comment
Monte
SBR MVP
08-21-10
2056
#25
Shrink blew his head off and left MB with a 500k debt, see it was very easy for them to loose money.
Comment
laconic
SBR High Roller
11-02-08
120
#26
I'm sure Betfair experimented with directly booking their high rollers over a trial period. It worked out ok for them in the end. However, they decided to end it after the trial as the volatility of the situation was a bit too rich for their blood I think.