Players should be REQUIRED!!!

[BatemanPatrickl]

To provide concrete evidence when bashing a book. If a player posts false information about a book, he or she should be banned.

Sp XYZ has lied but to whom and what was said? Any e-mails or IM chats to view?

[lawsofpower48]

this thread is another useless thread, but sadly i agree with you. SBR should just close all these threads.... all these types of threads are flooding up the forum with bs...everything from the hacking to the voting, to if the book is good..blah blah.... close these damn threads and if someone makes another, then its ban

i thought this forum is used to track payouts to whether a book is paying or not? and i thought this forum was used for players feedback (with actual evidence/proof)

[AimingHigh]

this thread is another useless thread, but sadly i agree with you. SBR should just close all these threads.... all these types of threads are flooding up the forum with bs...everything from the hacking to the voting, to if the book is good..blah blah.... close these damn threads and if someone makes another, then its ban

i thought this forum is used to track payouts to whether a book is paying or not? and i thought this forum was used for players feedback (with actual evidence/proof)

What kind of evidence / proof would be good enough for you? It's clear from KGambler's thread that BetPhoenix changed their story, refused to answer pertinent questions, ignored him, and ignored others with apparently legitimate disputes. If you have a book ignoring you, how else do you (realistically) expect to bring pressure on them to respond in a professional and detailed manner other than by forum posting pressure?

It seems like you and Bateman have a particular beef with the anti-BP threads. If you don't like them, don't read them and don't post in them. If your views represent the majority, the threads will slowly disappear off the front page. If your views are in the minority, they won't. Forum democracy at its finest.

[BatemanPatrickl]

Written proof smart guy.

[trixtrix]

op, you really start to sound like a betp shill, i have a medium 5 digit balance in bet phoenix but the burden of proof so far from what i gather is on bpgambler's side

what exactly are you inferring he "lied" about?

you are being a hypocrite by stating that bpgambler is tarnishing phoenix's good name and then tarnish his name in return w/out proof

[potless]

Written proof smart guy.

perhaps shills could provide written proof of the good standing of these paragons of bookmaking

[50cent]

you are right.......