Meeting Rollover by max betting ML/Spread/1H/FT same team

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PharaohUB
    SBR MVP
    • 01-23-07
    • 4865

    #1
    Meeting Rollover by max betting ML/Spread/1H/FT same team
    I was wondering if anyone has ever had issues max betting ML/Spread/1H/Ft on same team. I am trying to meet a ridiculous rollover at skybook and trying to speed up the process. It doesn't seem specifically against their rules, but it doesn't feel right either.

    Anyone do this and have issues to withdraw?

    And yes I asked chat. It went like this:

    -Hey can I max bet ML/Spread/1H/FT on same team
    -Seems you should be careful not to break rules
    -Is it against the rules?
    -Seems to be okay?
    -Is it okay, or seems okay?
    -Seems okay

  • stackz125
    SBR Hall of Famer
    • 01-03-16
    • 6191

    #2
    Hey can I max bet ML/Spread/1H/FT on same team
    -Seems you should be careful not to break rules
    -Is it against the rules?
    -Seems to be okay?
    -Is it okay, or seems okay?
    -Seems okay



    Seems ok
    Comment
    • ace7550
      SBR MVP
      • 05-08-15
      • 3729

      #3
      I had to Roll 85k there a few months ago. It was a nightmare but they did pay me (In 4k increments every 10/11 days).
      How much is your RO? They limit you yet?
      Comment
      • PharaohUB
        SBR MVP
        • 01-23-07
        • 4865

        #4
        Originally posted by ace7550
        I had to Roll 85k there a few months ago. It was a nightmare but they did pay me (In 4k increments every 10/11 days).
        How much is your RO? They limit you yet?
        I am limited to 500 on Full game spreads. 250 on everything else. I only have about 50k to roll. If I play ML/Spread/1H ml/1H Spread though I could knock out 1,250 per game wagered instead of 500.
        Comment
        • ace7550
          SBR MVP
          • 05-08-15
          • 3729

          #5
          Originally posted by PharaohUB
          I am limited to 500 on Full game spreads. 250 on everything else. I only have about 50k to roll. If I play ML/Spread/1H ml/1H Spread though I could knock out 1,250 per game wagered instead of 500.
          I would do it if they are allowing you to. "Seems ok" is a laughably unprofessional answer. Check out their Soccer lines. I'm not a soccer guy but surprisingly they have very competitive soccer lines and if you are betting 2 of the 3 ML's you are going to put a dent in that RO pretty quickly too.
          Good luck Pharaoh!
          Comment
          • BrickJames
            SBR Hall of Famer
            • 05-05-11
            • 9749

            #6
            Originally posted by PharaohUB
            I was wondering if anyone has ever had issues max betting ML/Spread/1H/Ft on same team. I am trying to meet a ridiculous rollover at skybook and trying to speed up the process. It doesn't seem specifically against their rules, but it doesn't feel right either.

            Anyone do this and have issues to withdraw?

            And yes I asked chat. It went like this:

            -Hey can I max bet ML/Spread/1H/FT on same team
            -Seems you should be careful not to break rules
            -Is it against the rules?
            -Seems to be okay?
            -Is it okay, or seems okay?
            -Seems okay

            Lol, That chat is hilarious!
            Comment
            • BrickJames
              SBR Hall of Famer
              • 05-05-11
              • 9749

              #7
              Originally posted by PharaohUB
              I am limited to 500 on Full game spreads. 250 on everything else. I only have about 50k to roll. If I play ML/Spread/1H ml/1H Spread though I could knock out 1,250 per game wagered instead of 500.
              What a pu$$y little shop. 500? 250? Thats a joke.
              Comment
              • ace7550
                SBR MVP
                • 05-08-15
                • 3729

                #8
                Originally posted by BrickJames
                What a pu$$y little shop. 500? 250? Thats a joke.
                It's $500 when you deposit. They changed my limit to $250 after 4 bets on MLB moneylines. If you're gonna make the limit $250 then just say so. Don't tell people $500 and then immediately change it after they deposit.
                Comment
                • BrickJames
                  SBR Hall of Famer
                  • 05-05-11
                  • 9749

                  #9
                  Originally posted by ace7550
                  It's $500 when you deposit. They changed my limit to $250 after 4 bets on MLB moneylines. If you're gonna make the limit $250 then just say so. Don't tell people $500 and then immediately change it after they deposit.
                  What a joke of a shop. I understand 1000 or 2000 limits, But 250 and 500 come on.

                  Sounds like they're operating on an extremely small bankroll.

                  They probably have like 50k in the bank Lol
                  Comment
                  • InsiderHer
                    SBR Sharp
                    • 12-18-12
                    • 333

                    #10
                    Originally posted by BrickJames
                    What a joke of a shop. I understand 1000 or 2000 limits, But 250 and 500 come on.

                    Sounds like they're operating on an extremely small bankroll.

                    They probably have like 50k in the bank Lol
                    Meanwhile the largest sportsbook on the planet bet365 will cut you down to $10 limits or show you the door, their bankroll must be 5 pounds, lol
                    Comment
                    • BrickJames
                      SBR Hall of Famer
                      • 05-05-11
                      • 9749

                      #11
                      Originally posted by InsiderHer
                      Meanwhile the largest sportsbook on the planet bet365 will cut you down to $10 limits or show you the door, their bankroll must be 5 pounds, lol
                      Very true sir.

                      Just seems counterproductive.
                      Comment
                      • Optional
                        Administrator
                        • 06-10-10
                        • 61517

                        #12
                        Originally posted by PharaohUB
                        I was wondering if anyone has ever had issues max betting ML/Spread/1H/Ft on same team. I am trying to meet a ridiculous rollover at skybook and trying to speed up the process. It doesn't seem specifically against their rules, but it doesn't feel right either.

                        Anyone do this and have issues to withdraw?

                        And yes I asked chat. It went like this:

                        -Hey can I max bet ML/Spread/1H/FT on same team
                        -Seems you should be careful not to break rules
                        -Is it against the rules?
                        -Seems to be okay?
                        -Is it okay, or seems okay?
                        -Seems okay

                        I guess he is just being honest that he can't guarantee it himself.

                        Better than some CS person who just says yes to get rid of you. As management wont usually care what CS agents say if it's stated in the rules somewhere.


                        If you have checked the rules and can't find anything against it, and there is a record of that chat, I think the worst they might do is not count it for rollover. The group doesn't seem to come up with excuses to not pay people over stuff like that that I have ever seen.
                        .
                        Comment
                        • BrickJames
                          SBR Hall of Famer
                          • 05-05-11
                          • 9749

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Optional
                          I guess he is just being honest that he can't guarantee it himself.

                          Better than some CS person who just says yes to get rid of you. As management wont usually care what CS agents say if it's stated in the rules somewhere.


                          If you have checked the rules and can't find anything against it, and there is a record of that chat, I think the worst they might do is not count it for rollover. The group doesn't seem to come up with excuses to not pay people over stuff like that that I have ever seen.
                          Optional I respect your opinion.

                          How much money do you actually think this particular Book is working with not the family or the Group or whoever but just this Book?
                          Comment
                          • BrickJames
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 05-05-11
                            • 9749

                            #14
                            In other words how much Do you actually think they have in cash Reserves to be limiting people like this
                            Comment
                            • Optional
                              Administrator
                              • 06-10-10
                              • 61517

                              #15
                              Originally posted by BrickJames

                              Optional I respect your opinion.

                              How much money do you actually think this particular Book is working with not the family or the Group or whoever but just this Book?
                              I have no idea. It would depend on how much the owners take out as much as anything else.

                              But with their tight player management the business itself looks like a profitable one to me, from outside.

                              Newspaper stories in CR a few years back talked about 5Dimes transferring over a billion $ out of the country's banks. Which kind of blew my mind. These old school books could be bigger than we imagine.
                              .
                              Comment
                              • BrickJames
                                SBR Hall of Famer
                                • 05-05-11
                                • 9749

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Optional
                                I have no idea. It would depend on how much the owners take out as much as anything else.

                                But with their tight player management the business itself looks like a profitable one to me, from outside.

                                Newspaper stories in CR a few years back talked about 5Dimes transferring over a billion $ out of the country's banks. Which kind of blew my mind. These old school books could be bigger than we imagine.
                                wow! a big B!

                                kind of funny how his ransom was only 1M but couldn't be paid.

                                something is very fishy down there. very very fishy.

                                I'm not Columbo I don't know what it is But something definitely stinks.

                                The law of large numbers tells us all that Just based on the juice alone all these books will make big money simply by making efficient lines and charging Juice.

                                Why would they want to limit players? obviously to line their pockets.
                                Comment
                                • BrickJames
                                  SBR Hall of Famer
                                  • 05-05-11
                                  • 9749

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by BrickJames
                                  wow! a big B!

                                  kind of funny how his ransom was only 1M but couldn't be paid.

                                  something is very fishy down there. very very fishy.

                                  I'm not Columbo I don't know what it is But something definitely stinks.

                                  The law of large numbers tells us all that Just based on the juice alone all these books will make big money simply by making efficient lines and charging Juice.

                                  Why would they want to limit players? obviously to line their pockets.
                                  His ransom was only 1m and then I hear A couple years later That His wife just paid 47 million to the US government to be free and clear of prosecution.
                                  Comment
                                  • Optional
                                    Administrator
                                    • 06-10-10
                                    • 61517

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by BrickJames
                                    Why would they want to limit players? obviously to line their pockets.
                                    Well yeah. They want to win too!

                                    I don't understand the Betphoenix model but they and sister sites have been running with this $250 limit for anyone who appears at all sharp for years now so I am guessing it keeps their % of rec bettors higher and lowers risk.

                                    I wish I had worked inside an offshore book to know a bit more about this sort of stuff. Not that I really want to do that these days.
                                    .
                                    Comment
                                    • Optional
                                      Administrator
                                      • 06-10-10
                                      • 61517

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by BrickJames
                                      His ransom was only 1m and then I hear A couple years later That His wife just paid 47 million to the US government to be free and clear of prosecution.
                                      She claims to have not been involved in the business. Maybe thats all she could access right then and there without Tony?

                                      The court case/s about it should be coming up this year.

                                      Can't wait to hear the full story same as everyone else. Not sure if you heard about the state he was allegedly eventually found in? Sounds like he was kept alive for a long time. Has to be more to the story than we have heard as yet.
                                      .
                                      Comment
                                      • BrickJames
                                        SBR Hall of Famer
                                        • 05-05-11
                                        • 9749

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Optional
                                        She claims to have not been involved in the business. Maybe thats all she could access right then and there without Tony?

                                        The court case/s about it should be coming up this year.

                                        Can't wait to hear the full story same as everyone else. Not sure if you heard about the state he was allegedly eventually found in? Sounds like he was kept alive for a long time. Has to be more to the story than we have heard as yet.
                                        I will be eager to hear.

                                        From what I read her name was President and CEO of everything that had to do with the business.

                                        it will definitely be a good read either way.
                                        Comment
                                        • BrickJames
                                          SBR Hall of Famer
                                          • 05-05-11
                                          • 9749

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Optional
                                          She claims to have not been involved in the business. Maybe thats all she could access right then and there without Tony?

                                          The court case/s about it should be coming up this year.

                                          Can't wait to hear the full story same as everyone else. Not sure if you heard about the state he was allegedly eventually found in? Sounds like he was kept alive for a long time. Has to be more to the story than we have heard as yet.
                                          Yes I heard it was about a two-hour drive, I also heard The reason that they offed him Is because He recognized the voice of a former employee.
                                          Comment
                                          • ace7550
                                            SBR MVP
                                            • 05-08-15
                                            • 3729

                                            #22
                                            I think these books have a lot more money than you think. Skybook is doing just fine. Take a look through the payout reports here at SBR. Skybook rarely gets mentioned. That means they are taking a lot more deposits than they are making payouts.
                                            They will pay if you win. Just damn tough to clear their huge RO's.
                                            Comment
                                            SBR Contests
                                            Collapse
                                            Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                            Collapse
                                            Working...