Last week I had placed a bet on Pinnacle, and as I knew there could be some confusion about the result (the initial winner - who I had layed - was disqualified right away, before the podium presentation) I immediately checked my bets on Pinnacle, and saw them graded correctly with the amended result.
Now I noticed that a day later they changed the grading of the bet though. So my bet is (incorrectly) graded as lost now, and my complaint about it was refused by the support, referring to the rule "All results posted shall be final after 72 hours and no queries will be entertained after that period of time. Within 72 hours after results are posted, the company will only reset/correct results due to human error, system error or mistakes made by the referring results source".
Checking the results on pinnacle.com you can even see that they have two winners for that stage now, which is obviously bullsh*t:

so I guess intially they graded it correctly with Gaviria as the winner, then someone sent in a "let's just give it a try" complaint showing a screenshot with Viviani celebrating on the line, and for whatever reason they changed it. And as 72 hours have passed now, it's final
Do you guys think they are right to still apply the 72 hours rule in a case like this, or is there a chance to still get this sorted out somehow?
Now I noticed that a day later they changed the grading of the bet though. So my bet is (incorrectly) graded as lost now, and my complaint about it was refused by the support, referring to the rule "All results posted shall be final after 72 hours and no queries will be entertained after that period of time. Within 72 hours after results are posted, the company will only reset/correct results due to human error, system error or mistakes made by the referring results source".
Checking the results on pinnacle.com you can even see that they have two winners for that stage now, which is obviously bullsh*t:

so I guess intially they graded it correctly with Gaviria as the winner, then someone sent in a "let's just give it a try" complaint showing a screenshot with Viviani celebrating on the line, and for whatever reason they changed it. And as 72 hours have passed now, it's final
Do you guys think they are right to still apply the 72 hours rule in a case like this, or is there a chance to still get this sorted out somehow?