MLB - Saturday, 6/24/17

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LT Profits
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 10-27-06
    • 90963

    #1
    MLB - Saturday, 6/24/17
    3 MLB Sides Saturday

    Athletics +102 (5 Dimes)
    Blue Jays -103 (Bookmaker)
    Pirates +126 (Bookmaker)


    YTD: 279-293-16, -1.82

    Totals Coming
  • LT Profits
    SBR Aristocracy
    • 10-27-06
    • 90963

    #2
    4 MLB Plays Saturday

    4 MLB Plays Saturday

    Athletics +102 (5 Dimes)
    Blue Jays -103 (Bookmaker)
    Blue Jays / Royals UNDER 9 +102 (5 Dimes)
    Pirates +126 (Bookmaker)
    Comment
    • pilebuck13
      SBR Posting Legend
      • 05-15-15
      • 17916

      #3
      👍 lots of movement on the a's T
      Comment
      • LT Profits
        SBR Aristocracy
        • 10-27-06
        • 90963

        #4
        Originally posted by pilebuck13
        �� lots of movement on the a's T
        Glad I got in ahead of it.
        Comment
        • pjimbo
          SBR Rookie
          • 03-18-13
          • 4

          #5
          Can you explain why you're going against Vargas? I put in a play on the royals last night based on his success this year (cy young numbers) and may get out of the play now based on your jays pick, but I'd like to understand your reasoning before doing so. Thanks.
          Comment
          • LT Profits
            SBR Aristocracy
            • 10-27-06
            • 90963

            #6
            Originally posted by pjimbo
            Can you explain why you're going against Vargas? I put in a play on the royals last night based on his success this year (cy young numbers) and may get out of the play now based on your jays pick, but I'd like to understand your reasoning before doing so. Thanks.
            Vargas is not that good, regression is a bitch. The 2.42 variance between his xFIP (4.69) and his ERA (2.27) is the largest negative variance in baseball among qualified starters. In fact, he is the only starter with a differential over 2.00 (2nd Ervin Santana 1.96, 3rd Dylan Bundy 1.59).

            Comment
            • LT Profits
              SBR Aristocracy
              • 10-27-06
              • 90963

              #7
              What is interesting though is model has Oakland 53% (-113), so my drop dead cut-off point would be -103. That means I would pass at current market unless A's come back down.
              Comment
              • Conqueror
                SBR Posting Legend
                • 12-08-13
                • 16777

                #8
                I'm glad you're not on the Orioles today . Fading them on the road has been money.
                Comment
                • LT Profits
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 10-27-06
                  • 90963

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Conqueror
                  I'm glad you're not on the Orioles today . Fading them on the road has been money.
                  I am not bias that way, every team in every game has a price where it has value. With that said, I don't blindly play ALL model picks. Rule of thumb is 10-point variance, but I have passed on games with bigger variances and played games with more minute differences. Only thing I never do is go against the model.
                  Comment
                  • pilebuck13
                    SBR Posting Legend
                    • 05-15-15
                    • 17916

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LT Profits
                    Vargas is not that good, regression is a bitch. The 2.42 variance between his xFIP (4.69) and his ERA (2.27) is the largest negative variance in baseball among qualified starters. In fact, he is the only starter with a differential over 2.00 (2nd Ervin Santana 1.96, 3rd Dylan Bundy 1.59).

                    http://www.fangraphs.com/leaders.asp...rs=0&sort=18,d
                    Interesting way to analyze stats
                    Comment
                    • Conqueror
                      SBR Posting Legend
                      • 12-08-13
                      • 16777

                      #11
                      Originally posted by LT Profits
                      I am not bias that way, every team in every game has a price where it has value. With that said, I don't blindly play ALL model picks. Rule of thumb is 10-point variance, but I have passed on games with bigger variances and played games with more minute differences. Only thing I never do is go against the model.
                      Many thanks.
                      Comment
                      • LT Profits
                        SBR Aristocracy
                        • 10-27-06
                        • 90963

                        #12
                        1 MLB Addition

                        5 MLB Plays Saturday

                        Athletics +102 (5 Dimes)
                        Blue Jays -103 (Bookmaker)
                        Blue Jays / Royals UNDER 9 +102 (5 Dimes)
                        Reds / Nationals UNDER 10 -105 (Heritage)
                        Pirates +126 (Bookmaker)
                        Comment
                        • LT Profits
                          SBR Aristocracy
                          • 10-27-06
                          • 90963

                          #13
                          2 More MLB Additions

                          7 MLB Plays Saturday

                          Athletics +102 (5 Dimes)
                          Blue Jays -103 (Bookmaker)
                          Blue Jays / Royals UNDER 9 +102 (5 Dimes)
                          Reds / Nationals UNDER 10 -105 (Heritage)
                          Cubs / Marlins OVER 8.5 -110 (Heritage)
                          Pirates +126 (Bookmaker)
                          Astros / Mariners UNDER 9 +100 (Heritage)
                          Comment
                          • stackz125
                            SBR Hall of Famer
                            • 01-03-16
                            • 6191

                            #14
                            What is
                            xFIP??
                            Comment
                            • LT Profits
                              SBR Aristocracy
                              • 10-27-06
                              • 90963

                              #15
                              Originally posted by stackz125
                              What is
                              xFIP??
                              Expected Fielding Independent Pitching (xFIP) is a regressed version of Fielding Independent Pitching (FIP), developed by Dave Studeman from The Hardball Times. It’s calculated in the same way as FIP…
                              Comment
                              • pjimbo
                                SBR Rookie
                                • 03-18-13
                                • 4

                                #16
                                LT, what are your picks for the Sunday night CFL game?
                                Comment
                                SBR Contests
                                Collapse
                                Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                Collapse
                                Working...