Republican vs Democrat

[DwightShrute]

New York Attorney General Letitia James faces mortgage fraud allegations stemming from property purchases decades ago in which she allegedly listed her father as her husband.




OH please be true!

[khicks26]

TWISTED-
Bad guy is directly in your mirror.
You always admire Islamofascists
and wonder why your family hates you.

Get back in your own bedroom.

What's a Islamofascists piss and moan guy. LOL

[19th Hole]

TWISTED-
Bad guy is directly in your mirror.
You always admire Islamofascists
and wonder why your family hates you.

Get back in your own bedroom.

[khicks26]

~~~
FAIL
Your posts are weaker and weaker.

Your post are meaningless as always. Call names piss and moan.

Your just a bad guy.

[19th Hole]

LOL Please explain how I'm wrong.

GL luck with that clown, maybe ask your lawn jockey he's smarter than you. LMAO

~~~
FAIL
Your posts are weaker and weaker.

[khicks26]

~~~
TWISTY remains as confused as always.
Word salads are his specialty --
His attempted failure to express fraudulent takes on
the political world.
Your posts are getting more desperate by the day.


Try to carry on.

LOL Please explain how I'm wrong.

GL luck with that clown, maybe ask your lawn jockey he's smarter than you. LMAO

[19th Hole]

Trump is wrong but can't cave to disobedience of any kind if he wants to an authoritarian. Which he does. Or which is sad to say the guy is dead.

~~~
TWISTY remains as confused as always.
Word salads are his specialty --
His attempted failure to express fraudulent takes on
the political world.
Your posts are getting more desperate by the day.


Try to carry on.

[khicks26]

~~~
That's why you remain a knuckle-dragging Islmofascist apologist.

Slither on.

I bet you still own a lawn jockey. LMAO

[khicks26]

You are twisting to excuse your govt ignoring YOUR rights and removing this guy before his appeal process was exhausted or a court legally allowed it.

He could be the worst person in the world, but does that justify YOUR rights being taken away.


Didn't you think you would always have a RIGHT to defend yourself legally in America?

And now you are happy to mock anyone who stands up for the law and YOUR rights. It's like you want to be under 1984 Big Brother control. Cheering for the destruction of rights when it suits you. Anti-American isn't it?

Trump is wrong but can't cave to disobedience of any kind if he wants to an authoritarian. Which he does. Or which is sad to say the guy is dead.

[19th Hole]

Just looked up at prior post by 19th after I posted this . Pretty much the same


1) Garcia was an illegal alien found by the Immigration Courts to be subject to removal from the United States.


2) By the evidence presented it was determined that he was a member of MS-13. That finding was later upheld by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals.


What appeal are you referring to ?

___

Absolutely...
Garcia is a declared terrorist and has exhausted
his right to any further appeals.

If the impossible were to happen and he was somehow returned to the U.S., he would immediately be returned to El Salvador.

According to American federal law Garcia is deposited in his rightful situation.

Again, reports and arguments to the contrary are erroneous.
This case is then settled.

[khicks26]

Yes really. If you’re saying others who make money in the stock market are living off the work of others, and you own stock, you’re a hypocritical bitch.

No it isn’t, Jerome Powell isn’t a banker, he’s a lawyer.

The market should control rates, but Volker did raise them to help drop inflation.

I don’t want to copy anything a hypocritical bitch loser like you does! LOL! Name some zombie corporations. You probably just heard Cenk or Sam use the term, and now you want to sound smart.

I didn’t say private ownership is fascism, it is allowed in fascism, like you’re saying there is in democratic socialism. The problem is that it was so regulated it was extremely difficult to open a business, like what will happen if you had your way. Joseph Smith, what a stupid hypocritical bitch!

Which they had in Brazil and they were poorer. You also said imperialism, which America had little of, and it was mainly after the Spanish-American War. Our colonies were tiny compared to empires of European countries, yet we were significantly wealthier, and the average American had a much higher standard of living than the average European.

No, I respond to your nonsensical rants you hear from Kyle and Thom.

Specifically where? I don’t contradict myself at all, you’re the one who hates colonization and imperialism but loves socialism, which is colonization and imperialism when it doesn’t cross boarders.

I've never been, but you worked around that stuff. Is the reason you hate rich people so much because they made you fight the homeless guys living by the docks for quarters?

No, but it’s your side that started the no Constitutional rights are absolute crap to erode our rights. They weren’t saying the Constitution is amendable, they’re saying your rights don’t apply in certain cases and the government can do anything. Welcome to the world you wanted me to live in, hypocritical bitch! LOL

Its not my system, I just live in it. I would rather not give people like you my money. LOL

Yes, it is

So, you do want it both ways, but I'm the hypocrite. LOL

Well, you copy me all the time because you can't think for yourself. LOL There's a term for it, look it up jackass.

I never said that that's one of your Josh assumptions that you do all the time. More assumptions to justify your BS. You really have nothing else.

More assumptions on your part, Stupid. Stealing peoples land and wealth is imperialism. LOL

More like you try to twist the truth. LOL

LOL Shouldn't we all be against colonization and imperialism which can happen in any system.

I don't hate rich people, some of the people I did work for were great. Not greed is good, I don't want to pay my tax's, don't touch my stuff douche bags at all. LMAO

I don't have a side. I'm just pointing out how you were wrong and say stupid shit. LOL

[jt315]

You are twisting to excuse your govt ignoring YOUR rights and removing this guy before his appeal process was exhausted or a court legally allowed it.

He could be the worst person in the world, but does that justify YOUR rights being taken away.


Didn't you think you would always have a RIGHT to defend yourself legally in America?

And now you are happy to mock anyone who stands up for the law and YOUR rights. It's like you want to be under 1984 Big Brother control. Cheering for the destruction of rights when it suits you. Anti-American isn't it?

Just looked up at prior post by 19th after I posted this . Pretty much the same


1) Garcia was an illegal alien found by the Immigration Courts to be subject to removal from the United States.


2) By the evidence presented it was determined that he was a member of MS-13. That finding was later upheld by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals.


What appeal are you referring to ?

[19th Hole]

Again, there is no legal right for anyone to arbitrarily decide a judge should be listened to or not.

There is a legal appeal process for that.

You're 100% arguing against constitutional rights. And why I was asking why you do not think it's Anti-American thinking.

~~~
The judge is a regional federal judge with no jurisdiction in
in international immigration decisions.

The criminal in question was pronounced a member of
MS-13 by a federal immigration court and a federal appellate immigration court.

Therefore he is declared a terrorist.

He has no legal recourse and must be deported to his country of origin.
In this case El Salvador and they accepted him.

Reports and arguments to the contrary are erroneous.
This case is then settled.

[19th Hole]

Yeah, that's why he became Uncle Thomas Sowell.

~~~
That's why you remain a knuckle-dragging Islmofascist apologist.

Slither on.

[Optional]

Its mind boggling how people defend a gang member from another country who is in the country illegally. Fukk him and I hope teh POS rots in prison.

Do I really sound like I care about defending a gang member? Or even this guy personally?

Try and avoid the thought any way you choose to, but you are doing it because the way this was handled is uncomfortable for any fair minded person to be happy about it. And alarming for a law abiding citizen who thinks they have inalienable rights in the USA.

[DwightShrute]

Sure, if the law has said the guy should have have ben deported, and his rights of appeal have been exhausted, there should be no argument. (but you know that isn't true of course)

You again betray your words with all the erroneous crap about "someone said he was a hairdresser in the media... so the constitution should no longer count for this person".

None of that would even come to mind as needing to be said if your real argument is simply that this is legal and constitutional.

Sounds a lot more like you care about making points about the media than you care at all about what is legal, right, or anti-American.

Its mind boggling how people defend a gang member from another country who is in the country illegally. Fukk him and I hope teh POS rots in prison.

[Optional]

Obviously you refused to watch the video which a few people, who know the laws more than you and me, explained it all and the SCOTUS voted 9-0 for Trump's team. It seems as if you know more about the constitution and the laws of the country that they do.

I mean, I didn't comment on this immediately because it seemed strange and I wanted to hear more. The MSM told us all that this was a mistake, he wasn't a gang member, he was a gay hairdresser and wasn't giving his due process. Turns out he was a gang member, was told by the courts years ago to leave the country, and the only mistake was some paperwork which had nothing to do whether or not he was going to be removed from the country. The president of El Salvador said there is no way he would send a terrorist to the United States. So this particular gang member isn't coming back, and no goofy partisan hack judge make anyone do it.

Sure, if the law has said the guy should have have ben deported, and his rights of appeal have been exhausted, there should be no argument. (but you know that isn't true of course)

You again betray your words with all the erroneous crap about "someone said he was a hairdresser in the media... so the constitution should no longer count for this person".

None of that would even come to mind as needing to be said if your real argument is simply that this is legal and constitutional.

Sounds a lot more like you care about making points about the media than you care at all about what is legal, right, or anti-American.

[DwightShrute]

Again, there is no legal right for anyone to arbitrarily decide a judge should be listened to or not.

There is a legal appeal process for that.

You're 100% arguing against constitutional rights. And why I was asking why you do not think it's Anti-American thinking.

Obviously you refused to watch the video which a few people, who know the laws more than you and me, explained it all and the SCOTUS voted 9-0 for Trump's team. It seems as if you know more about the constitution and the laws of the country that they do.

I mean, I didn't comment on this immediately because it seemed strange and I wanted to hear more. The MSM told us all that this was a mistake, he wasn't a gang member, he was a gay hairdresser and wasn't giving his due process. Turns out he was a gang member, was told by the courts years ago to leave the country, and the only mistake was some paperwork which had nothing to do whether or not he was going to be removed from the country. The president of El Salvador said there is no way he would send a terrorist to the United States. So this particular gang member isn't coming back, and no goofy partisan hack judge make anyone do it.

[Optional]

there is no argument of my end. I posted that video once before and again for you to see. It clearly explains it. The judge overstepped his authority. It seems to happen a lot when it comes to Trump. Remember last year when judges allowed Trump's name to be removed from the ballot because competent judges overturned his insane ruling.

Again, there is no legal right for anyone to arbitrarily decide a judge should be listened to or not.

There is a legal appeal process for that.

You're 100% arguing against constitutional rights. And why I was asking why you do not think it's Anti-American thinking.

[DwightShrute]

Why is this even being discussed if that is true?

You had better explain the law to the judge who ruled he had not been allowed his rights.

And if you genuinely thought that was actually true, you would not be typing all these words about how terrible he is etc. You would not need to. You'd only need to say the words, his legal rights were exhausted so it was legal to deport him. End of discussion. No further argument would have been needed.

there is no argument of my end. I posted that video once before and again for you to see. It clearly explains it. The judge overstepped his authority. It seems to happen a lot when it comes to Trump. Remember last year when judges allowed Trump's name to be removed from the ballot because competent judges overturned his insane ruling.