No, you don't understand my point. China is not taking Trump's bluff. Trump can't do anything to them as they have no elections so he can force a regime change. Why would China back down on tariffs as it only hurts the US? Last time Trump put tariffs on China he had to bail out the farmers with subsidies as they couldn't sell their soybeans and pork to China.
why would Trump want regime change in China? Has he hinted or said anything along those lines? Of course he hasn't.
Pavy, Trump is living in next week already while you are still trying to make sense of what happened 2 weeks ago.
Absolutely nobody would buy these calls that far out of the money expiring today without knowing something.
I don’t care how good you are - this rally would not have rocketed like this without news - no way.
There was absolutely insider information - absolutely.
you reek of desperation as usual. Trump said days ago and even weeks ago, that there could be some short term pain. So he told you when the market might fall and when the market might go up. You laughed and applauded when the market went down, and when it went up (like we all knew it would) you immediately push the narrative you are being told to.
Absolutely 100% incorrect, or as you like to say "a complete lie". This is about restricting access, not about deciding to not speak to somebody. Don't be so obtuse.
"Separation of Powers".
The U.S. Constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law).
The POTUS isn't a king.
"[T]he Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalists—be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhere—it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints. The Constitution requires no less," U.S. District Court Judge Trevor N. McFadden wrote in his opinion.
~~~
Icon defending morons who cannot put 2 words together.
Protesters interviewed were asked what they were protesting about...
Responses ranged from -- "Everything" to "what's going on in the world".
Not one specific item could be gleaned from idiot's A through Z.
No, you don't understand my point. China is not taking Trump's bluff. Trump can't do anything to them as they have no elections so he can force a regime change. Why would China back down on tariffs as it only hurts the US? Last time Trump put tariffs on China he had to bail out the farmers with subsidies as they couldn't sell their soybeans and pork to China.
~~~
Wavy-
You don't understand the Chinese economy---
Trump's s worldwide tariff's strike at the core of Chinese exporters' two main strategies to blunt
the impact of trade war: moving some production abroad and increasing sales to non-U.S. markets.
The sweeping tariffs could deal a lasting blow to global demand.
China is more exposed to the risk of shrinking world commerce than any other nation,
with economic growth last year relying heavily on running a trillion-dollar trade surplus.
Kaiyuan Securities expects the new tariffs could slash Chinese exports to the United States by 30%,
cut overall exports by more than 4.5%, and drag economic growth by 1.3 percentage points.
further evidence how the radical Left fukking hates America.
shameful
No, you don't understand my point. China is not taking Trump's bluff. Trump can't do anything to them as they have no elections so he can force a regime change. Why would China back down on tariffs as it only hurts the US? Last time Trump put tariffs on China he had to bail out the farmers with subsidies as they couldn't sell their soybeans and pork to China.
Neither should matter, what the constitution says is all that SHOULD MATTER. But we all know the GOP don't care as long as they get their way. No matter what you or I think should be done. They should follow the law. Or change it thru congress.
The judge wasn't following the law. He's a political activist. At least in this instance. SCOTUS did good.
Imagine some fukking unelected judge telling the president what he can or cannot do when it comes to these criminals/terrorists?
Impeach the scumbag I say.
Neither should matter, what the constitution says is all that SHOULD MATTER. But we all know the GOP don't care as long as they get their way. No matter what you or I think should be done. They should follow the law. Or change it thru congress.
He should be in prison for insider trading and market manipulation. But I like that China is fighting back with more tariffs as they have nothing to lose. No 401ks in China as the party controls everything and no danger of midterms.
further evidence how the radical Left fukking hates America.
And 4 hours later he announces a pause in his reciprocal tariffs.
In ordinary times this would be recognised as a serious crime.
He should be in prison for insider trading and market manipulation. But I like that China is fighting back with more tariffs as they have nothing to lose. No 401ks in China as the party controls everything and no danger of midterms.
BREAKING: The U.S. House passes HR 1526, curbing the power of district court judges to issue nationwide injunctions against presidential policies—aimed at restraining judicial overreach.
Leave a comment: