Trump Legal Cases

[jackpot269]

Yes it's different, it would take some low IQ person not to know that.

Clinton’s situation was a public settlement of a public lawsuit. Ever who posted this don't know the difference between public and under the table. How the hell can a public lawsuit be hushed, when the whole world already knows about it, and I thought my education was bad. Unbelievable.

[jackpot269]

So when the USA is at war the president has immunity? When isn't the US at war? Oh, when Trump was president. I forgot.

I am not saying a president has total immunity. He can't sneak out of the WH and blow people away with a glock. He does having immunity while carrying out the duties of a president. Yes, that includes looking into the legitimacy of the election results among countless other things.

Am I wrong?

We were at war during Trumps term. Where were you?

No, A POTUS does not have immunity during war time. The seal team killed an armed man (Bin Laden) wanted for crimes against the USA.

Dwight said,
''Yes, that includes looking into the legitimacy of the election results among countless other things''.

Nothing wrong with investigating election fraud. You have to do it within the Law, If you break the Law, you become the one to be investigated. Even if you don't believe the reasonable people around you telling you, no large-scale fraud happened. Even the expert you paid $750,000 showed you proof that it wasn't true, or there was not enough evidence to prove it. Breaking in voting machines illegally is not lawfully investigating.

[Itsamazing777]

Hareeba thought Trump would be jailed for violating the gag order.

The Billionaire was fined 9k.

[slewfan]

[DwightShrute]

[DwightShrute]

Several reason that would not happen. He was not killed on USA soil for one. We were at war for 2. Thats just 2 there are more reasons if you want to know look it up.

So when the USA is at war the president has immunity? When isn't the US at war? Oh, when Trump was president. I forgot.

I am not saying a president has total immunity. He can't sneak out of the WH and blow people away with a glock. He does having immunity while carrying out the duties of a president. Yes, that includes looking into the legitimacy of the election results among countless other things.

Am I wrong?

[jackpot269]

congrats

You mean to dollar tree.

[jackpot269]

the president is above the law when it comes to carrying out his duties while president. Obama ordered the murder of Bin Laden and he rightfully wasn't charged with murder.

Wisdom has been chasing you but you have always been faster.

Several reason that would not happen. He was not killed on USA soil for one. We were at war for 2. Thats just 2 there are more reasons if you want to know look it up.

[DwightShrute]

[DwightShrute]

Dollar tree has open 2 new stores with in 4 miles of my house in the last year.

congrats

[jackpot269]

shave your balls pals

Dollar tree has open 2 new stores with in 4 miles of my house in the last year.

[DwightShrute]

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">David Schoen- There is no crime here <a href="https://t.co/whSGiWwXx3">pic.twitter.com/whSGiWwXx3</a></p>&mdash; Karli Bonne’ ���� (@KarluskaP) <a href="https://twitter.com/KarluskaP/status/1784741592009441673?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw" >April 29, 2024</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

[jt315]

It is newsworthy that Trump is falling asleep and is apparently having trouble with his bowels. It’s a matter of presidential fitness

https://twitter.com/i/status/1783720146382786844

The man that has access to nuke codes now requires aides to escort him across a lawn.

These handlers now walk between Biden and the pool cameras, "to draw less attention to the 81-year-old's halting and stiff gait.

”Biden advisers told Axios they're concerned that videos of Biden walking and shuffling alone — especially across the grass — have highlighted his age.

[DwightShrute]

[Hareeba!]

It is newsworthy that Trump is falling asleep and is apparently having trouble with his bowels. It’s a matter of presidential fitness

https://twitter.com/i/status/1783720146382786844

[Hareeba!]

In front of the Supreme Court of the United States, an attorney in good standing actually argued that the president could be immune from prosecution if he has his political rival assassinated.

Justice Sotomayor:
“I am having a hard time thinking that creating false documents… that ordering the assassination of a rival, that accepting a bribe and countless other laws that could be broken for personal gain, that anyone would say that it would be reasonable for a president or any public official to do that,”

We need more Sotomayors and fewer Alitos, Kavanaghs and Gorsuchs.

[DwightShrute]

the president is above the law when it comes to carrying out his duties while president. Obama ordered the murder of Bin Laden and he rightfully wasn't charged with murder.

Wisdom has been chasing you but you have always been faster.

[jt315]

Oh my ! Time is not on team Lawfare’s side Hairyballs


tick tick tick

Why Shouldn’t We Send it Back?’ Chief Justice Roberts Suggests Kicking the Can Down the Road on Trump Immunity Case.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...se/ar-AA1nF8ST

[Hareeba!]

[jackpot269]

The judge in 2015 or 2016 attacked Trump, he defended himself. There is a huge difference with an individual expressing his opinions about a case and a President weaponizing the entire justice system against a political opponent.

So he bragged. Whoopdi do. Is bragging a crime now? The dems tried to remove a political opponent (Trump) from the ballot in a few States. Thankfully Trump had the opportunity to appoint reasonable judges to the SCOTUS. BTW, that isn't stacking the court. Stacking teh court is what the dems wanted to do by increasing the number of judges on the court.

Sure, I bet you could write 15 more lines but none of those are undermining the legal system actually. Its called freedom of speech. Undermining the legal system would be a democratic judge who donated to Biden in the last election overseeing this ridiculous case which was not even pursued by the feds because there was no case. A non-corrupt DA wouldn't have charged him to begin with and a honorable judge would have dismissed it immediately, and at worst, would have recused himself.

I guess, commit your crimes in a more political friendly area. That is the reason we have trial by jury. Let the jury decide.


Dwight said,

"Thankfully Trump had the opportunity to appoint reasonable judges to the SCOTUS. BTW, that isn't stacking the court. Stacking teh court is what the dems wanted to do by increasing the number of judges on the court."

The judges he appointed being reasonable is debatable.

Not all Democrat's wanted to add judgers to SCOTUS.