-
Comment -
I believe her more than you. You obviously don't understand it at all. No offense but how would nowadays it be rare for someone not to mention covid related on calls. I do private security and they even ask if the person I'm calling about when I call dispatch if they have covid related symptoms.Last edited by Demonata; 07-28-21, 09:08 AM.Comment -
No.
It's like this.
I believe we have some climate change going on, but not to the extent the Al Gore types lead me to believe.
The data is there, but the data the extremists use is cherry picked, in other words some numbers are used, the ones that support their agenda, and the rest of the data is swept under the rug.
Same thing with the COVID vaccine.
To form a proper analysis all the data must me analyzed, not bits and pieces, or else your conclusion will be severely flawed.Comment -
Yep that's why you cant believe a small sample size and the more you talk to the more your point should be valid. So how can you say you believe a small sample size of individuals. There are extremists that support the vaccine and don't support it so don't be biased. You say you are an IT tech.That's awesome. I used to do coding in my early 20s and explored the internet to a deep extent. You really believe the government is really trying to help us? That it is not for financial gain? That no agenda is part of the covid pandemic?Comment -
Oh, don't get me started on the government.
lol
I'll sum it up briefly, they are a necessary evil.
Yeah, I'm an IT analyst by trade, and the son of a Navy military engineer.
So my points of views are different.
Code?
Yeah, I can write code for a living if I chose to, but I choose not to. lol
Beyond tedious and meticulous and I'd probably bludgeon myself to death with a spade shovel over my temple if I programmed for a living 24/7.
The company I work for in New Haven set me (and a couple dozen) others up so we work 100 percent at home remotely now.
It's a beautiful thing, I can play on the internet (and I do) if it doesn't interfere with the job I get paid to do.Comment -
Haha fair enough
Yeah I used to work online and code but I just got too bored and really like helping save or protect people so went in to private security. Almost was going yk get in to cyber security but I hate sitting for long periods of time and love the fresh air outside.
Yeah man I would as well if I had to do it that much haha. Yeah that's awesome you can be remote and not at a set location. Pretty much can live anywhere that way.Comment -
SCIENCE B*TCHES! Always re-evaluating the data and cross-checking amongst peers.
"This year's vaccine, formulated for the H1N1 strain of influenza virus, has been 47 percent effective so far, the CDC also said. Last year's vaccine was 36 percent effective at the same point in the season. Overall, the 2017-2018 vaccine was 40 percent effective for the entire season."
And all I keep reading or seeing, is people say shit about "well looky looky, another person that got the fake Gate's vaccine still got covid." and blah blah blah.
Like the dumbasses that say "Sure are a lot of people that got the vaccine still testing positive."
Yeh! Duh! Before the vaccine rollout if someone tested positive for covid, they just tested positive for covid. Now as more and more people are vaxed, AND because of more opening of businesses and states loosening guidelines, and so many non-vaxed, and with newer mutated strains developing - it's like , YES! people are gonna be vaxxed and still end up testing positive.
And it's now just a new metric to account for. Another variable.
Before if someone tested positive for covid it was marked as a case and/or positive for covid.
Now, if someone has been vaxxed and tests positive for covid it is marked as a vaxxed person and a case and/or positive for covid.
It's just a NEW penetrating category. But dumbasses don't get it.
Hell, there's probably even categories for people that test positive and whether they got both shots, or what brand vaccine they got, or was it the one-shot J&J, and how long since the one shot, or the first shot, or last shot, and yada yada yada.
Science!Last edited by louisvillekid; 07-31-21, 02:15 PM.Comment -
There is democrat science and Repuplican science.
They get money via grants to say whatever they are paid to do. So many sheep...Comment -
Comment -
They think they are gods, as if a demented fool has power over nature.Comment -
Comment -
ivermectin, zinc, vits c and d are all you need.....
i'm goin to do a psa ivermectin thread later today, to hopefully save a few of you that are unfortunate to come down with the KUNG FLU.....Comment -
A lot of y'all sure don't want your pudding.Comment -
Dr. Pancakes R. Delicious
@0syruppancakes
·
5h
My grandmother finally passed today. 2mos after collapsing the day after her 2nd shot from blood clots & irregular blood pressure. She never recovered. RIP, Momo
Comment -
News of India’s defeat of the Delta variant should be common knowledge. It is just about as obvious as the nose on one’s face. It is so clear when one looks at the graphs that no one can deny it.
Yet, for some reason, we are not allowed to talk about it. Thus, for example, Wikipedia cannot mention the peer-reviewed meta-analyses by Dr. Tess Lawrie or Dr. Pierre Kory published in the American Journal of Therapeutics.
Wikipedia is not allowed to publish the recent meta-analysis on Ivermectin authored by Dr. Andrew Hill. Furthermore, it is not allowed to say anything concerning www.ivmmeta.com showing the 61 studies comprising 23,000 patients which reveal up to a 96% reduction in death [prophylaxis] with Ivermectin.
One can see the bias in Wikipedia by going on the “talk” pages for each subject and reading about the fierce attempts of editors to add these facts and the stone wall refusals by the “senior” editors who have an agenda. And that agenda is not loyalty to your health.
The easy way to read the “talk” page on any Wikipedia subject is to click the top left “talk” button. Anyone can then review the editors’ discussions.
There is a blackout on any conversation about how Ivermectin beat COVID-19 in India. When I discussed the dire straits that India found itself in early this year with 414,000 cases per day, and over 4,000 deaths per day, and how that evaporated within five weeks of the addition of Ivermectin, I am often asked, “But why is there no mention of that in the news?”
Yes, exactly. Ask yourself why India’s success against the Delta variant with Ivermectin is such a closely guarded secret by the NIH and CDC. Second, ask yourself why no major media outlets reported this fact, but instead, tried to confuse you with false information by saying the deaths in India are 10 times greater than official reports.
Comment -
Comment -
Not sure what you consider old but 2 healthy people in their mid fifties that I've known most of my life have died in the last week from covid. I'm not sure if we should trust the pushed thru faster than any in history Trump vaccines or not. Crazy how most Trump supporters are against it and the democrats' who dislike him are pushing it. Only in America I guess its what makes us great!!Comment -
I have as much respect for Steve as anyone on this forum. One of the few that can debate without hate. He don't have to degrade someone else to make his point!! This is not the norm but the exception around here.
Steve this hits the nail on the head and its not only extremists any newsoutlets you listen to are very skilled at only giving you the points they want you to here if its fox, abc, nbc, cbs, or any of the others even if a fact don't disprove their point they are still only giving you what shines the light on their agenda. Of coarse the political host that want you to think they are news just make stuff up and blow it up!!Comment
