It appears that split pots are not counting towards poker rollover.
I don't think this is totally fair. For one, it meets the requirement of having your points at risk and your bet called.
Second, for those who say it creates an easy way to complete rollover when both players have straights or something, it's never guaranteed the pot will split. One player could have the higher straight, etc.
For the 2nd time tonight, I had a split pot happen in situations where I didn't expect it. A lot was bet by both of us and it didn't count for rollover. For example, we both had AQ off with a Q, but also a straight draw, on the board. Neither of us knew for sure if the other person had the straight.
3X rollover is already bordering a tough requirement and takes hours to clear for the bigger amounts. Not counting split pots just makes it that much harder by adding an unnecessary exception.
I don't think this is totally fair. For one, it meets the requirement of having your points at risk and your bet called.
Second, for those who say it creates an easy way to complete rollover when both players have straights or something, it's never guaranteed the pot will split. One player could have the higher straight, etc.
For the 2nd time tonight, I had a split pot happen in situations where I didn't expect it. A lot was bet by both of us and it didn't count for rollover. For example, we both had AQ off with a Q, but also a straight draw, on the board. Neither of us knew for sure if the other person had the straight.
3X rollover is already bordering a tough requirement and takes hours to clear for the bigger amounts. Not counting split pots just makes it that much harder by adding an unnecessary exception.