Want to try an experiment

[Jimmy Proffett]

I'm starting to get the SBR treatment again, cooler after cooler. What I want to do is the following:

1) One person sits with me at a 1-2 table

2) We limp into every pot and check all the way down

3) Find out who wins the hand. I'll keep track of my hands won vs hands lost


I would like to do this for 100 hands. I realize this may take some time but I'm willing to do this: If you come out on top, you keep the profit. If I come out ahead, I'll pay you back whatever you lose.

[Jimmy Proffett]

It doesn't have to be a 1-2 table, but that's the max I want to sit at. .25-.50 or .50-1 will also work

[IMightBluff]

I'm starting to get the SBR treatment again, cooler after cooler. What I want to do is the following:

1) One person sits with me at a 1-2 table

2) We limp into every pot and check all the way down

3) Find out who wins the hand. I'll keep track of my hands won vs hands lost


I would like to do this for 100 hands. I realize this may take some time but I'm willing to do this: If you come out on top, you keep the profit. If I come out ahead, I'll pay you back whatever you lose.

It doesn't have to be a 1-2 table, but that's the max I want to sit at. .25-.50 or .50-1 will also work

This has got to be the most retarded thing I have ever seen in my life. And I have seen 2 paraplegics trying to have sex...

[4uk4life]

This has got to be the most retarded thing I have ever seen in my life. And I have seen 2 paraplegics trying to have sex...

You love everybody don't you

[bobbywaves]

One has to question your motives for spying on 2 paraplegics.

[4uk4life]

I'm starting to get the SBR treatment again, cooler after cooler. What I want to do is the following:

1) One person sits with me at a 1-2 table

2) We limp into every pot and check all the way down

3) Find out who wins the hand. I'll keep track of my hands won vs hands lost


I would like to do this for 100 hands. I realize this may take some time but I'm willing to do this: If you come out on top, you keep the profit. If I come out ahead, I'll pay you back whatever you lose.

That's usually how I play anyway Jimmy lol, being the wuss that I am. If I wasn't in the 7pm..

[IMightBluff]

One has to question your motives for spying on 2 paraplegics.

Who said i was spying?

[Jimmy Proffett]

Okay, I'll up the ante.

I'll double whatever profit you make from the 100 hands, and if you end up down I'll match whatever amount you're down. So say you end down 15 points; I'll send you 30.

[4uk4life]

Something like that wouldn't be considered collusion would it

[andyjc712]

This has got to be the most retarded thing I have ever seen in my life. And I have seen 2 paraplegics trying to have sex...

Actually your thread dedicating 10 plus pages to your grind to win sbr points is the most retarded thing i have seen. You are one total assclown sir

[Jimmy Proffett]

Something like that wouldn't be considered collusion would it

At first I wouldn't think so. But I forgot about rollovers; if one of us were using rollover points I don't think SBR would like it. And I don't know if they can differentiate between if people are using rollover points or not. So I don't know if this is gonna fly.

[Triple_D_Bet]

At first I wouldn't think so. But I forgot about rollovers; if one of us were using rollover points I don't think SBR would like it. And I don't know if they can differentiate between if people are using rollover points or not. So I don't know if this is gonna fly.

OK, I'll bite....what would be the point of all this again?

[Jimmy Proffett]

My assumption is that if 100 hands between 2 opponents are played out to the river, the wins vs losses should fall near a 50/50 split. Of course more hands would result in closer to 50/50, but I didn't want to take all day with it. I feel that at this current time, the cards are against me, and my opponent will always have the best hand at the river. I acknowledge that it's worked the other way too, with me always a pip over my opponent's hand.

I honestly don't know how much the losses would have to surpass the wins in order to prove anything. I mean if I only win 5 out of 100 that would prove my point. But what if I went 25-75? or 30-70? I don't know where you differentiate between variance and 'riggedness'

But I don't think the experiment can happen due to rollovers factoring in. I'll just suck it up and lose to inside straights for the next 2 weeks.

[troidatoi12]

dont do it... You dont want to pry too deep

[Triple_D_Bet]

My assumption is that if 100 hands between 2 opponents are played out to the river, the wins vs losses should fall near a 50/50 split. Of course more hands would result in closer to 50/50, but I didn't want to take all day with it. I feel that at this current time, the cards are against me, and my opponent will always have the best hand at the river. I acknowledge that it's worked the other way too, with me always a pip over my opponent's hand.

I honestly don't know how much the losses would have to surpass the wins in order to prove anything. I mean if I only win 5 out of 100 that would prove my point. But what if I went 25-75? or 30-70? I don't know where you differentiate between variance and 'riggedness'

But I don't think the experiment can happen due to rollovers factoring in. I'll just suck it up and lose to inside straights for the next 2 weeks.

There's plenty of info out there for the kind of distributions you'd expect to see...but if you don't know where to draw the line for rigged/not rigged, the results wouldn't mean anything. Not to mention 100 hands is a insignificant sample.

[Scrappy Do]

This has got to be the most retarded thing I have ever seen in my life. And I have seen 2 paraplegics trying to have sex...

I have a problem with this statement son... you have disgraced many a damn fine people on this forum. You need to die. aka. go away. I have many a friends in the military, and I would dare you in the real world (yea I know it is only a belief in your mere mind) to make a statement as stupid as this in the real world. You would get stomped in the dirt like a fat ass tick off a hound. (I would swing first)

[troidatoi12]

I have a problem with this statement son... you have disgraced many a damn fine people on this forum. You need to die. aka. go away. I have many a friends in the military, and I would dare you in the real world (yea I know it is only a belief in your mere mind) to make a statement as stupid as this in the real world. You would get stomped in the dirt like a fat ass tick off a hound. (I would swing first)

I bench 450lb, i doubt i would get stomped in the dirt like a penetrate renewing

[ballahollic2]

This is the most flawed experiment for so many reasons.

[Scrappy Do]

My assumption is that if 100 hands between 2 opponents are played out to the river, the wins vs losses should fall near a 50/50 split. Of course more hands would result in closer to 50/50, but I didn't want to take all day with it. I feel that at this current time, the cards are against me, and my opponent will always have the best hand at the river. I acknowledge that it's worked the other way too, with me always a pip over my opponent's hand.

I honestly don't know how much the losses would have to surpass the wins in order to prove anything. I mean if I only win 5 out of 100 that would prove my point. But what if I went 25-75? or 30-70? I don't know where you differentiate between variance and 'riggedness'

But I don't think the experiment can happen due to rollovers factoring in. I'll just suck it up and lose to inside straights for the next 2 weeks.

Sorry Jimmy.... Never meant to derail your thread. Derail joined it earlier Back on topic... what would a mere 100 sample hand prove as it is a very very low sample size... continue please.. and sorry again.

[daneblazer]

Download poker stove or some variance generator and sim to your hearts content for a fraction of the time.

[Sacrelicious]

Yeah pokerstove is your best bet here, by far.

[BigDeem5]

I'm at a table pal.