-
Comment -
I pretty much agree.
But there has to be middle ground on so called 'gun control'
I should have the right to keep a gun in my house, I should not have the right to bring assault rifles to closed in public events.
I should have the right to carry an handgun within reason, I should not have the right to walk around downtown with an AK draped around my shoulder...........Comment -
Guns= negative outcomes.
Have never known it to be ANY other way...Comment -
Who gives a fukkComment -
I disagree 110%.
You cannot start policing gun access. Who decides when an where I should have the rights afforded to me in the constitution? If this type of concession is given, it creates snowball effect that would never stop.
I have no criminal record of any kind. Why shouldn't I be allowed access to any type of firearm I choose to own as long as its purchased and registered legally?Comment -
Like I said earlier, prohibit booze like in the '20's you'd still be able to get it, prohibit anything, if you want it, you'll still be able to get it.
When I worked in NYC, there was a 10 block radius in the East Village (East 8th St. area) where you could get, a bet in, a handgun, a gram of coke, a whore, you name it.Comment -
Just another 12 dead people.
Nothing to see here.Comment -
Shut the fukk up, moron. I realize you're desperately trying to attain some relevance on here by coming off as shocking and callous, but its actually only serving to affirm the overall belief that you're simply a pathetic, immature dildo.
Those 12 people included fathers, mothers, and little kids. Show them some respect.Comment -
Opie fukk off you fukking pansie bitch.
Ive had about enough of your gay ass shitComment -
Most of Europe, Japan, Singapore, S. Korea are basically prohibited, look at their gun crimes/homicides.
The reason why it would not work here is the pool of guns out there is already too big, obviously nothing would stop someone from accessing it. That's how the society was brought up so now people have to deal with it.
People in those countries don't even "think" about guns. Don't even talk about them.
If someone wanted to do this every single day, there is nothing that can done about it. No laws pro or against.Comment -
People saying gun control is the reason are morons.
Strict gun laws = people who really wanna kill people will pay any price to get a gun and will eventual acquire one. Everyone else will be unarmed.
Lenient gun laws = a lot of people will have guns for self defense and protection. Might deter people from acting a stupidComment -
You guys are arguing with a 3 time bush voting born with a silver spoon in his mouth blonde haired twink.
Its useless.Comment -
I bet this guy would have thought twice before going into a theatre to shoot it up if he knew that the people inside the theatre were armed. Not really a grand shooting spree if you get greased before you can even get a few shots off.
Killers like this pick easy targets like theatres because they know the people in them will be unarmedComment -
Because what does banning assault weapons accomplish?
It's no different than the war on drugs. People who want drugs will find a way to get them even if the sale and possession of them are illegal. No different than assualt weapons.
It's just a way for politicians to beat their chests while being oblivious to the fact that people who really want the weapons will still get them.
In the end nothing is accomplishedComment -
By access, I mean it's scary to think of how easily you can obtain a semi-automatic weapon if you try hard enough.
I have a few gun-crazed buddies that really have no business owning the firearms they do. I admit I'm more than a little uncomfortable with the situation, but they didn't exactly have to go through the ringer to obtain them, you know?
I think it should be more difficult to obtain a firearm (deeper background checks), but I have no problemComment -
How do you feel about gun control?
Same way I feel about birth control, doesn't workComment
