Hawks +355 ML Tonight!

[biggamer3]

I get that the Bulls are fav's but they should not be by this much. Hawks are way better then the Pacers and the Pacers took the Bulls to the last minute of several games in Chicago.


Hawks +355 is too much value to pass up

[StraitShooter]

Did the hawks suffer a key injury lately or are they healthy anyone know?..Heard something not up to date

[biggamer3]

yeah Hinrich aint playing, Joe Johnson will likely take Rose

[No coincidences]

no.

[CntryBoy]

I'm taking the points.. have some on the ML also. Good value IMHO. BOL!

[jstblaze]

Almost makes me want to play chicago giving points, and Hawks ML.

Hawks are a night and day team.

[Blax0r]

+355 is pretty huge; is the probability of the hawks winning really only ~22%?

[fsfalcons]

I'd definitely take a shot at those odds

[thebestthereis]

hawks of course, bulls could barely cover vs the placers. it's obvious. all over the bulls, good luck!

[Vulcan300]

it's passed up because 2nd round home team favs usually dominate. not forgetting hinrich is out...might as well bet on mosley.

[tukkk]

take the handicap and be happy

[craigpb]

Just because there is value does not mean it has a chance. The smart play is usually the less profitable play.

[marcoloco]

i like it

[biggamer3]

there we go, i knew i would have others join this money train

[biggamer3]

Just because there is value does not mean it has a chance. The smart play is usually the less profitable play.

i dont understand what you are saying? If you always bet value picks you will make money in the long run

[ngates815]

money train.

Take the points if anything although I don't even think those will help Hawks backers.

But ML is +355 for a reason.

[pokerplayer22]

Indiana matched up good against Chicago but Atlanta does not. Other than blowing a big 2nd half lead one game this year against Atl, Chicago handled them with ease this year. Although, Im generally all for going with value, the Bulls -8 or 8.5 is the way Im going.

[jjgold]

Good Play

Atl has very good one on one players

They should keep it low scoring and close

[ngates815]

Indiana matched up good against Chicago but Atlanta does not. Other than blowing a big 2nd half lead one game this year against Atl, Chicago handled them with ease this year. Although, Im generally all for going with value, the Bulls -8 or 8.5 is the way Im going.

Exactly.

[tennisjump]

Under 178 has big value in this gam imo

[blinky88]

Hawks....

[AikenJ]

Almost makes me want to play chicago giving points, and Hawks ML.

Hawks are a night and day team.

That's what I'm doing

[dmiles1021]

real good value!

[justonetime]

Took a small stab at +420

[UntrainedPilot]

If I'm not mistake the Bulls only covered one game last series.

[jjgold]

only chance Atl has it to keep scores low

[ngates815]

If I'm not mistake the Bulls only covered one game last series.

If I'm not mistake the Bulls match up completely different than they did with the team they played last series.

[RoagBettor]

Atlanta sucks. They beat a very ordinary Magic team and wouldn't have gotten by the Pacers. The Bulls were tired from going all out to get the best record in the league, it affected them in the first round. It won't happen in the second round.

[chantrain]

Pacers played great team defense. Hawks...don't know the meaning of the word team defense

[lunchbawks]

+8.5 is a lot of points. don't get too greedy on the ML..

you can tell im backing ATL +8.5 tonight

[NBA_Brosuf]

+405 now

[BettingWizard]

Pacers played great team defense. Hawks...don't know the meaning of the word team defense

yeah they only held Orlando to terrible 3 point shooting all year long

Indiana is below Atlanta in every defensive category

[chantrain]

and are those defensive categories from the regular season or only for the post season?

[BettingWizard]

better in the postseason too, don't see what you're getting at.

[SimonSayz]

Bulls win by 12. Hinrich was the only chance the hawks had at perimeter defense....now they're yeast have no answer for drose.