If you had Stanford -4.5 that was a pineapple

**jgray** · 11-13-10, 10:30 PM

Yup. He screwed me.

**dfberger23** · 11-13-10, 10:32 PM

What the hell was that? I didn't bet on this game but my buddy had Stanford -4.5.

Never seen anything like that.

**castle** · 11-13-10, 10:33 PM

Fukked me. God damn fukking Stanford.

**Brock Landers** · 11-13-10, 10:34 PM

I had the ML, could have cared less, but, that was total bullshit, whoever told that asshole he should fall down when he is in the clear for a TD to go up by 11 is an idiot

**opie1988** · 11-13-10, 10:35 PM

Yep. Jim Harbaugh just had his freshman tailback sodomize me. Asswipe Cardinal!!!

**MendozaLine** · 11-13-10, 10:36 PM

what are you talking about? that was the smartest play I have seen in my life. Why even give Arizona State a chance? Come on Brock. Stop talking out of your ass

Originally posted by Brock Landers

I had the ML, could have cared less, but, that was total bullshit, whoever told that asshole he should fall down when he is in the clear for a TD to go up by 11 is an idiot

**DrunkHorseplayer** · 11-13-10, 10:37 PM

I had it; second time this year I've lost by a hook. The other was when TCU missed an XP with about six minutes left.

**pavyracer** · 11-13-10, 10:38 PM

I had Stanford -4.

-4.5 to -5.5 are dead numbers

**jgray** · 11-13-10, 10:39 PM

Originally posted by MendozaLine

what are you talking about? that was the smartest play I have seen in my life. Why even give Arizona State a chance? Come on Brock. Stop talking out of your ass

Like I said, it got me as I had the -4.5. You are entirely correct.

**jgray** · 11-13-10, 10:40 PM

Originally posted by pavyracer

I had Stanford -4. -4.5 to -5.5 are dead numbers

Thanks for the education, Pavy. Although if he score the touchdown, those numbers aren't dead, they are winners.

**agharah1** · 11-13-10, 10:48 PM

That's why I took the game moneyline. They're playing to win, not cover the spread.

**Brock Landers** · 11-13-10, 10:51 PM

Originally posted by MendozaLine

what are you talking about? that was the smartest play I have seen in my life. Why even give Arizona State a chance? Come on Brock. Stop talking out of your ass

the way the game was going, with the time left, there was NO FUKKING WAY you fall down there. You score, in fact, he should have done a flip into the end zone. those who had the spread got popeye punked there

**jgray** · 11-13-10, 10:54 PM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

the way the game was going, with the time left, there was NO FUKKING WAY you fall down there. You score, in fact, he should have done a flip into the end zone. those who had the spread got popeye punked there

Come on man. Don't be dense. By falling down you bring the game down to two plays and only two plays. All you have to do is snap the ball twice. You don't have to play defense. You don't have to recover an onside kick. All You have to do is snap the ball and take a knee. The player made the right call.

KC · 11-13-10, 10:55 PM

Classy and smart play by Stanford, unlike the end of MichSt/Nwestern a few weeks ago where MichSt could have ran out clock and instead decided to score to go up 8 and give Nwestern a shot. Btw had Azst +4.5

**k13** · 11-13-10, 10:55 PM

They should have lost SU.

If you had -4.5, you don't deserve a cover, you deserve to lose.

KC · 11-13-10, 10:57 PM

Notice the carma that came back and bit the Spartans, they got whooped by Iowa the following week.

**MendozaLine** · 11-13-10, 11:09 PM

What would be the point of scoring there Brock? If you go down, the game is 2 knees from being over. If you score, you give ASU the ball back. Now what would be the logical thing to do in that spot?

Originally posted by Brock Landers

the way the game was going, with the time left, there was NO FUKKING WAY you fall down there. You score, in fact, he should have done a flip into the end zone. those who had the spread got popeye punked there

**your pixel army** · 11-13-10, 11:27 PM

I had Stanford at -4, so all I could do was laugh.

That was the smartest move that RB could make at the time. Just unfortunate for some of us that he exercised a little bit of brains as well as brawn on the field.

Why give ASU a .5% chance to win when you can deal them a guaranteed loss? Easy answer: You don't.

**WeinketoWarrick** · 11-14-10, 12:09 AM

The chances of ASU score two touchdowns with :50 and no timeouts was less than Stanford fumbling while kneeling and giving up just one score.

******* score, jackass. In years past Harbaugh not only tells his back to score, he goes for two afterwards. I'd seriously put it about 1:1 that Harbaugh bets, and I"d put it 1.5:1 that Harbaugh had Stanford ML -170 and ASU +7 from the opener.

At least I had the ML too.

**mtneer1212** · 11-14-10, 12:11 AM

Thats why they go to Stanford. They are smart!

**thecodster** · 11-14-10, 12:13 AM

that was some funny shit

**thejrichshow85** · 11-14-10, 12:14 AM

luckly bought a point and a half to get them down to 3

**Albert Pujols** · 11-14-10, 10:47 AM

Originally posted by Brock Landers

the way the game was going, with the time left, there was NO FUKKING WAY you fall down there. You score, in fact, he should have done a flip into the end zone. those who had the spread got popeye punked there

You are a ******* moron. Completely braindead.

**Albert Pujols** · 11-14-10, 10:49 AM

Originally posted by your pixel army

I had Stanford at -4, so all I could do was laugh.

That was the smartest move that RB could make at the time. Just unfortunate for some of us that he exercised a little bit of brains as well as brawn on the field.

Why give ASU a .5% chance to win when you can deal them a guaranteed loss? Easy answer: You don't.

Bingo. Any other opinion is complete horseshit.

**serc** · 11-14-10, 10:51 AM

Agreed! Luckily I had -3.5

**blackbox** · 11-14-10, 01:29 PM

terrible way to lose a wager-glad I was not watching the game.

**YotesFan47** · 11-14-10, 04:26 PM

Try to be on the right side next time fellas.