There is only ONE who can actually LOCK games

[ssk13809]

ok but you have way more then 7 posted ATS picks by week 2
that Im not even counting
so your record is false

lol those are all LEANS

I said at the beginning that I would tell my "recommended" ATS games, and then later I would post the ones I bet on.

And thats what I did. I made it CLEAR which games I am betting on by "Official Bets".


And all the games I bet on had "To Risk ____ units and to Win ____ units"


/Conversation




So whats your point again? You posted my Week 1 results, which I counted, and ? It's clear which ATS games I bet on, by which games I risked units in. You can't bet without risking anything.










Dude are you high right now? Do you A point?


- You post my Week 1 results. Okay thanks I counted that towards my all my claims and my overall record.
- You show me ATS leans I had that were wrong. Okay thanks. I did NOT bet them for a reason.


Whats your point? I'm still waiting.

[B1GER1C828]

ok but you have way more then 7 posted ATS picks by week 2 that Im not even counting so your record is false LOL THIS IS THE BEST PARLAY Falcons -3 Falcons -175 ML Risk 5 Win 9

this cant even be parlayed.

[ssk13809]

LOL THIS IS THE BEST PARLAY


Falcons -3
Falcons -175 ML

Was voided as written in the thread. I thought I could do that. But I my bookie voided. Not an experienced bettor as you can tell. 1st time doing parlays.

So I played all my plays by the rules.




So once again what is your POINT?

[ssk13809]

this cant even be parlayed.

Yeah that's why it was VOIDED and did NOT COUNT in my overall results



All my results are 100% legit guys. You can check the thread 3 times over if you want.


poor rfr3sh is trying his best. But failing.

[acarmelo1]

lol those are all LEANS

I said at the beginning that I would tell my "recommended" ATS games, and then later I would post the ones I bet on.

And thats what I did. I made it CLEAR which games I am betting on by "Official Bets".


And all the games I bet on had "To Risk ____ units and to Win ____ units"


/Conversation




So whats your point again? You posted my Week 1 results, which I counted, and ? It's clear which ATS games I bet on, by which games I risked units in. You can't bet without risking anything.










Dude are you high right now? Do you A point?


- You post my Week 1 results. Okay thanks I counted that towards my all my claims and my overall record.
- You show me ATS leans I had that were wrong. Okay thanks. I did NOT bet them for a reason.


Whats your point? I'm still waiting.

Dont pay atention to the haters, if you feel your system work and you are winning money. No reason to pay atention to him.

Just continue to post your picks and by the end of the season your record will talk by itself.

[ssk13809]

Dont pay atention to the haters, if you feel your system work and you are winning money. No reason to pay atention to him.

Just continue to post your picks and by the end of the season your record will talk by itself.

I find it funny he is looking at my ATS "lean" games and trying to count them.



Do I have to spell it out that the 6-0-1 is only for games I BET. Aka "risk units" or risk something like every bet and like all my other bets? This guy has got to be 5. I thought things like that were "implied". In a thread where units are being risked, the games that are "bet" are the ones where units are risked. Did I really have to SAY that? Wow.


Or how about posting my Week 1 results, and....and nothing. They also counted and my records are STILL that good.



But you're right haters gonna hate

[ssk13809]

Now rfr3sh before you bring up any MNF games, know that I COUNTED THEM TOO towards my record & overall unit count


Read my Sig carefully

SSK's NFL Thread Picks (Season):
Straight ML Bets: 9-4 (Avg. Bet Odds +110)
NFL Games ATS Picks: 6-0-1
NFL Overall: +55.9 Units (+55.9%)



My thread reflects exactly those results

[rfr3sh]

Why dont you count all fo your parlays

[ssk13809]

Why dont you count all fo your parlays

I don't keep a separate record for them, but they DO count towards my overall unit count. So once again, everything bet in my thread is counted. Including parlays. I'm up 55+% with parlays included.

[rfr3sh]

anyways, im done arguing,
you sample size is 7 games or whatever no one cares
you declined my challenge of 100 pts NBA contest
(speaks enough for itself)
everyone in your thread is just lauging at you
you tried to parlay falcons -3 and falcons ML what kind of sick joke is that
you cried because Romo got injured and put an * next to your units

anyways good luck with whatever you think you are doing
if you ever wanan get your ass whooped in NBA over 100+ plays or whatever, let me know I'm not going anywhere

[ssk13809]

anyways, im done arguing,
you sample size is 7 games or whatever no one cares
you declined my challenge of 100 pts NBA contest
(speaks enough for itself)
everyone in your thread is just lauging at you
you tried to parlay falcons -3 and falcons ML what kind of sick joke is that
you cried because Romo got injured and put an * next to your units

Sample size is not 7 when u look at MLs

And all my results from the other thread are 100% legit now. You can't even deny that. My bookie and I voided that parlay. I counted the Romo game as well. And so on.

anyways good luck with whatever you think you are doing
if you ever wanan get your ass whooped in NBA over 100+ plays or whatever, let me know I'm not going anywhere

I'm better overall in the NBA than NFL.

That statement speaks for itself.

[tony_come]

Im confused...so whats the play's pal

[ssk13809]

Im confused...so whats the play's pal

Check my NFL thread in NFL forum. I post plays in it. I will post Sunday plays later today.

[rfr3sh]

So why did you decline the challenge if you are better in NBA then NFL

[ssk13809]

So why did you decline the challenge if you are better in NBA then NFL

We've already gone over this. It's primetime NFL. It's not primetime NBA yet. Primetime NFL > Early NBA. But primetime NBA > primetime NFL.


Thats just the way it works. Otherwise, you think I'd be scared of facing a loser like you (compared to me) who I would just destroy. It would be over in 2 weeks, just like my year long NFL contest is over in 1 month.

[rfr3sh]

[big0mar]

This guy makes one play a week!

[ChileCheese]

You sounds like a big pussy bro.
Accept the Challenge.
Its just points, not real cash.

[Gee]

This guy is still around? really??

he has already had 2 of his threads closed, plays 'imaginary' games and creates second accounts to support himself. the threads are a pretty funny read, if nothing else. some people shouldn't be allowed to start threads anymore

His first play in the NBA season was (with a 100 unit bank) the lakers ML, 32.5 to win 10. remember that game where blake hit the big 3 right at the end?

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nfl-handicapping/709715-ssks-nfl-ml-thread-p7.html

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basketball-handicapping/750649-ssks-nba-thread.html

[Indecent]

After all, I hit 90+% Locks long-term, overall ATS I should hit 70-90% since overall I am very selective these days with the ATS games I really bet, with only 2/week in that percentage range. (So these are not all LOCK picks).

MLs I bet more often. But 500 is still a while to go.

You keep using this phrase "long term". I do not think it means what you think it means.

[Indecent]

All my plays that were posted, injuries occurring or not, counted.

Losing lock

Game I am betting on.
Vikkings -5.5 (LOCK)

.. Hilarious excuse as to why this bet doesn't count in 5, 4, 3, ...

[emoney]

When you see someone trying to argue with a fool, it becomes hard to tell which one is the fool.

[ssk13809]

.. Hilarious excuse as to why this bet doesn't count in 5, 4, 3, ...

I don't need to make an excuse up. Let me just show you something I already said.


1st post of thread, and 1st thing I said in the 1st post, you missed it. Here it is.

I base my picks on my NFL analysis. After about 4 weeks, as I get used to each NFL team as they are now and am able to properly analyze them,

I actually start locking games.

So when do I lock games ? Week 2 when the basis of my picks (Properly analyzing each team) isn't even there yet?


Once again, I base my picks on my NFL analysis, which is properly established after Week 4. Hence, I made my NFL thread post week 4 when I had a good grip on each NFL team.




But once again, it's called READ THE THREAD. If it makes you feel better, and this also holds true and is what I said, I LOCK games Post Week 4. So now we are all consistent.

[ssk13809]

This guy is still around? really??

he has already had 2 of his threads closed, plays 'imaginary' games and creates second accounts to support himself. the threads are a pretty funny read, if nothing else. some people shouldn't be allowed to start threads anymore

His first play in the NBA season was (with a 100 unit bank) the lakers ML, 32.5 to win 10. remember that game where blake hit the big 3 right at the end?

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nfl-handicapping/709715-ssks-nfl-ml-thread-p7.html

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nba-basket...ba-thread.html

All lies


- Name me 1 imaginary game I played. Not jokingly said I was going to play, but played it.

- The reason the threads closed wasn't me

- I never created a 2nd account. And the ADMIN can confirm that

- I won that play so whats your point. I'm not ready for the NBA yet anyways






Lying is cheap. Try to bring me down with the truth.




Next

[ssk13809]

This guy makes one play a week!

Actually I make 3-5 per week on the NFL for the last time. You still don't get it.

You sounds like a big pussy bro.
Accept the Challenge.
Its just points, not real cash.

I know thats what it is, but lets not call it a "challenge". Because really, I have no challenge. Ask the last guy who "challenged" me in a contest.

[sharpcat]

you should start over nobody is going to pay you for your picks after 15 bets and a review of your posting history. Your record is not any where near large enough to lead anybody to believe that you will be successful long term and you have already made too many enemies who will make it a point to expose you as a fraud.

Time to move on and next time try to be a little more believable people are gullible but not stupid nobody is going to buy the B.S. that you are attempting to sell here.

[ssk13809]

you should start over nobody is going to pay you for your picks after 15 bets and a review of your posting history. Your record is not any where near large enough to lead anybody to believe that you will be successful long term and you have already made too many enemies who will make it a point to expose you as a fraud.

Time to move on and next time try to be a little more believable people are gullible but not stupid nobody is going to buy the B.S. that you are attempting to sell here.

What are you talking about? I'm not selling any picks here. All my picks are in my thread for free. And all my previous results can be confirmed by looking through my thread. Everything is consistent.

[sharpcat]

What are you talking about? I'm not selling any picks here. All my picks are in my thread for free. And all my previous results can be confirmed by looking through my thread. Everything is consistent.

Cut the crap pal either you are another unemployed fool hoping to go tout or you are just an attention whore.

Nobody goes through as much trouble as you have just to post their picks

[ssk13809]

Cut the crap pal either you are another unemployed fool hoping to go tout or you are just an attention whore.

Nobody goes through as much trouble as you have just to post their picks

This is player talk. People bring in various topics. I brought one too. That's all. I just had to look up "tout" to see what it meant and thats not me.


Besides, I also wanted to make a point, nobody on SBR is as good as in NFL Handicapper as me. No one.

[Indecent]

But once again, it's called READ THE THREAD. If it makes you feel better, and this also holds true and is what I said, I LOCK games Post Week 4. So now we are all consistent.

I read the thread, perhaps more specifically than you intended.

Let me summarize:

• The word "lock" in your threads/etc has special meaning. You consistently refer to these types of games and the record of these games separately. They seem to be one of the key ways you determine picks.

• You specifically called a game a "lock" in the quote/thread I posted.
• The game did not win.
• The week 4 distinction came after the pick lost. If you won would it count towards your record?
• You posted this in the same thread: "But yeah, 0-1 in locks, upsets happen. Big deal. Not worried. I know what I can do."
• Most importantly, you are an idiot.

Let me know which of these points you disagree with. The last point is not up for debate I'm afraid.

[dfberger23]

[ssk13809]

I read the thread, perhaps more specifically than you intended.

Let me summarize:

• The word "lock" in your threads/etc has special meaning. You consistently refer to these types of games and the record of these games separately. They seem to be one of the key ways you determine picks.

• You specifically called a game a "lock" in the quote/thread I posted.
• The game did not win.
• The week 4 distinction came after the pick lost. If you won would it count towards your record?
• You posted this in the same thread: "But yeah, 0-1 in locks, upsets happen. Big deal. Not worried. I know what I can do."
• Most importantly, you are an idiot.

Let me know which of these points you disagree with. The last point is not up for debate I'm afraid.

No the distinction has always been there. I have been saying from the start of the season that my picks are based on my NFL analysis. For the 1st few weeks I still think this team is the same from last year since I have said I don't watch preseason. So I lost on teams like MINN or DAL who have gotten a lot worse now. My analysis for them were not up to date.

That's why I give myself a 4 week time to catch up and update my analysis.



Besides, here is a better question, what does THAT have to do with THIS thread?

Can you not read? Let me post the 1st thing written in this thread

I base my picks on my NFL analysis. After about 4 weeks, as I get used to each NFL team as they are now and am able to properly analyze them,

I actually start locking games.

So this thread is about my plays Post Week 4 (after my analysis is up to date), OR my thread picks. Does what you said fit either of those? No? Oh that's too bad. That makes it IRRELEVANT. Look it up in the dictionary because I'm assuming based on your post intelligence level you don't know what that means.

Now, if you want to dispute any of my claims, do it. Because my claims in this ENTIRE thread have been about what I have done in my thread, or Post Week 4. NOTHING ELSE.


Reading comprehension is obviously something you have struggled with. I mean, just read the 1st part of my post again please before you bring out another borderline retarded comment that is completely irrelevant. One more time kid, since you need extreme repetition

I base my picks on my NFL analysis. After about 4 weeks, as I get used to each NFL team as they are now and am able to properly analyze them,

I actually start locking games.

And

And one more time, all these results are from my NFL Thread

Now go dispute any of my claims. Not claims I never make. Here, I can't LOCK games prior to the 4 Week mark. Does that satisfy you now? Your claim disputes NOTHING I have said. In fact, I agree with it.

[crustyme]

what a clown.

lol

[ssk13809]

If anyone wants to discuss my thread results that have been going on for the past 5-6 weeks, let me know


I'm not here for irrelevant discussion or discussion not pertaining to everything I have posted in MY thread.



Things are clear though


9-4 ML on Avg. Odds of +110
And
6-0-1 ATS


Anyone want to discuss and "clown" on them, let me know. Otherwise, I'm not in for some irrelevant out of thread discussion sorry.

[cartonhead]

ssk, don't worry, be quite: no problem