OK
1st of all, your reference to Soros, don't count him in as the uber lefty liberal you think he is.
I'm not a fan personally, but he puts his money in very interesting places, more into conservative and moderate policy machines as it comes to "correcting" an overshoot politically or economically. He's anti communist and anti fascist and I truly believe he seeks economic opportunity out of the civil unrest, he doesn't support it, he seeks to profit from it.
With respect to my one vote per warranty deed idea. It's an ammendment 1st and foremost, so it bypasses state law. Your homestead is declared federally anyway. So there's the basis.
Now, your concept for gaming the system as detailed above, has BLM buying up land in Alaska and North Dakota now to, supposedly, then "gift" to would be voters I assume. Of course, this would be a great wealth transfer to the current white landowners up there, who'd presumably take your money today if you're a willing buyer, and of course the city and County, who will gladly then take your property tax dollars or, if you fail to pay, the property itself.
But yeah...you go ahead and work on gaming the system....more brilliant minds have come before you, between 1776-1789 and 1789- 1920s suffrage movement/1950s end of Jim Crow era. The voting patterns for those 175 years built this country, created the dominant economy, created the strongest consumer, built the middle class and fostered an advanced education system. All that not only survived multiple pandemics and a civil war, but won independence and 2 global conflicts. Why??? Because white male property owning individuals foresaw the recklessness of expanding rights and treasury proceeds to neighbors who didn't, themselves, have any skin in the game. At anytime in those 175 years any number of Confederate sympathizers could have bought up northern lands, any number of women paid men to vote, any number of free blacks purchased homesteads, etc....it can't fix an election.
As with most liberal ideas, yours looks great on paper, but isn't feasible in reality. And if it were, it'd be to your own detriment as you'd only be transfering wealth back to white land owners to equal, not out gain, their vote....year after year.
1st of all, your reference to Soros, don't count him in as the uber lefty liberal you think he is.
I'm not a fan personally, but he puts his money in very interesting places, more into conservative and moderate policy machines as it comes to "correcting" an overshoot politically or economically. He's anti communist and anti fascist and I truly believe he seeks economic opportunity out of the civil unrest, he doesn't support it, he seeks to profit from it.
With respect to my one vote per warranty deed idea. It's an ammendment 1st and foremost, so it bypasses state law. Your homestead is declared federally anyway. So there's the basis.
Now, your concept for gaming the system as detailed above, has BLM buying up land in Alaska and North Dakota now to, supposedly, then "gift" to would be voters I assume. Of course, this would be a great wealth transfer to the current white landowners up there, who'd presumably take your money today if you're a willing buyer, and of course the city and County, who will gladly then take your property tax dollars or, if you fail to pay, the property itself.
But yeah...you go ahead and work on gaming the system....more brilliant minds have come before you, between 1776-1789 and 1789- 1920s suffrage movement/1950s end of Jim Crow era. The voting patterns for those 175 years built this country, created the dominant economy, created the strongest consumer, built the middle class and fostered an advanced education system. All that not only survived multiple pandemics and a civil war, but won independence and 2 global conflicts. Why??? Because white male property owning individuals foresaw the recklessness of expanding rights and treasury proceeds to neighbors who didn't, themselves, have any skin in the game. At anytime in those 175 years any number of Confederate sympathizers could have bought up northern lands, any number of women paid men to vote, any number of free blacks purchased homesteads, etc....it can't fix an election.
As with most liberal ideas, yours looks great on paper, but isn't feasible in reality. And if it were, it'd be to your own detriment as you'd only be transfering wealth back to white land owners to equal, not out gain, their vote....year after year.
