My Bookie robbed me of $8K

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Farm_Life
    SBR Rookie
    • Yesterday
    • 4

    #1
    My Bookie robbed me of $8K
    I wagered $8,800 on NL to win the all-star game last night. Grading this wager no action would be really scummy if there wasn’t any language indicating there’s no action if the game is tied after 9 complete innings. It transcends scummy when there is language that clearly indicates that the game will be action if it is tied after 9 innings. They originally graded my wager a win, then took the money out of my account and graded it no bet. Will post a photo to confirm.

    I called to talk to a supervisor, some Asian lady. She initially told me the wager was no action because I had the run line lol. She then couldn’t explain a scenario in which the (incl. extra innings) situation could have played out. She finally flat out admitted she was unaware of the all-star game format for extras. Pretty sickening shit.
    Attached Files
  • 2Sweeet
    SBR MVP
    • 08-31-22
    • 1200

    #2
    Some places paid some didin't. I personally think it should be a Push. I don't think most books were aware this was going to happen if the game was tied.
    Comment
    • Chiefs83
      SBR MVP
      • 08-01-16
      • 2802

      #3
      I had the All star game at about 8 diff books, pre & live i bet. All my wagers were graded. Would of loved the bets to be Voided as my biggest play was NL -1.5

      What other books Voided
      Last edited by Chiefs83; Today, 07:42 AM.
      Comment
      • Farm_Life
        SBR Rookie
        • Yesterday
        • 4

        #4
        Originally posted by 2Sweeet
        Some places paid some didin't. I personally think it should be a Push. I don't think most books were aware this was going to happen if the game was tied.
        So a book should randomly void a bet that’s tied after 9inn after they specifically confirm they won’t void it in parentheses?
        Comment
        • stevenash
          Moderator
          • 01-17-11
          • 65449

          #5
          I had the AL runline; it was graded a no-action push.
          I'm fine with that decision.
          Comment
          • Optional
            Administrator
            • 06-10-10
            • 61329

            #6
            If the market says (inc extra innings) as shown in the screenshot, how can there be any argument that it should be graded a winner?

            What am I missing?
            .
            Comment
            • Farm_Life
              SBR Rookie
              • Yesterday
              • 4

              #7
              Originally posted by Optional
              If the market says (inc extra innings) as shown in the screenshot, how can there be any argument that it should be graded a winner?

              What am I missing?
              Thank you for the response!

              If there was zero language on the slip, I would still consider it pretty goofy to grade it no action unless specified ties after 9 are void. But to have it say it includes extra innings and then have it cancelled just smells to high heaven. Especially after them grading it a win originally for an hour or two.

              All I wanted from the supervisor is give me one scenario where (incl. extra innings) comes into play.
              Comment
              • Optional
                Administrator
                • 06-10-10
                • 61329

                #8
                Originally posted by Farm_Life

                Thank you for the response!

                If there was zero language on the slip, I would still consider it pretty goofy to grade it no action unless specified ties after 9 are void. But to have it say it includes extra innings and then have it cancelled just smells to high heaven. Especially after them grading it a win originally for an hour or two.

                All I wanted from the supervisor is give me one scenario where (incl. extra innings) comes into play.
                It might be worth using email instead of live chat and ask if it can be escalated to a supervisor to double check. I'm not sure how any manager who knows how betting works could argue with you.
                .
                Comment
                • pavyracer
                  SBR Aristocracy
                  • 04-12-07
                  • 82710

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Farm_Life

                  Thank you for the response!

                  If there was zero language on the slip, I would still consider it pretty goofy to grade it no action unless specified ties after 9 are void. But to have it say it includes extra innings and then have it cancelled just smells to high heaven. Especially after them grading it a win originally for an hour or two.

                  All I wanted from the supervisor is give me one scenario where (incl. extra innings) comes into play.
                  Try to find out how they graded the AL win bets. Because if they graded yours as push and the AL wins as loss it's very concerning.
                  Comment
                  • unde0087
                    BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                    • 03-27-08
                    • 28908

                    #10
                    Originally posted by 2Sweeet
                    Some places paid some didin't. I personally think it should be a Push. I don't think most books were aware this was going to happen if the game was tied.
                    Have to agree with you on this one. It seems this book wasn't even aware the MLB was implementing new rules for just this game, which is pretty mickey mouse if you ask me. I will say a push after how that game went down would be a satisfactory conclusion to me. A home run derby to declare winner was a coin toss at best. I don't really understand how someone fires off several thousand dollar bet on a glorified exhibition game to begin with but to each their own.
                    Since the book can probably just claim they weren't aware of rule changes they can pretty much grade however they see fit. The only way you win this is having a screenshot of prior rules they had posted on extra innings scenario.
                    I know one thing. If this was me and the book doesn't give me a satisfactory answer or conclusion to this situation, A) remaining balance would be withdrawn that day B) would never get a single bet from me ever again
                    Comment
                    • Optional
                      Administrator
                      • 06-10-10
                      • 61329

                      #11
                      Originally posted by unde0087

                      Have to agree with you on this one. It seems this book wasn't even aware the MLB was implementing new rules for just this game, which is pretty mickey mouse if you ask me. I will say a push after how that game went down would be a satisfactory conclusion to me. A home run derby to declare winner was a coin toss at best. I don't really understand how someone fires off several thousand dollar bet on a glorified exhibition game to begin with but to each their own.
                      Since the book can probably just claim they weren't aware of rule changes they can pretty much grade however they see fit. The only way you win this is having a screenshot of prior rules they had posted on extra innings scenario.
                      I know one thing. If this was me and the book doesn't give me a satisfactory answer or conclusion to this situation, A) remaining balance would be withdrawn that day B) would never get a single bet from me ever again
                      Someone please explain to me what I have wrong to think stating (extra innings included) on the market offering is in any way ambiguous for the purposes of grading?

                      I admit baseball is my weakest sport knowledge and I often ask for a second opinion when it comes to baseball grading disputes. But I am confused as hell as to why so many regulars think the book may be correct here.

                      C'mon someone, help me out and explain why like its Baseball Betting For Dummies.
                      Last edited by Optional; Yesterday, 07:50 PM.
                      .
                      Comment
                      • unde0087
                        BARRELED IN @ SBR!
                        • 03-27-08
                        • 28908

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Optional

                        Someone please explain to me what I have wrong to think stating (extra innings included) on the market offering is in any way ambiguous for the purposes of grading?

                        I admit baseball is my weakest sport knowledge and I often ask for a second opinion when it comes to baseball grading disputes. But I am confused as hell as to why so many regulars think the book may be correct here.

                        C'mon someone, help me out and explain why like its Baseball Betting For Dummies.
                        There isn't much to explain. A typical baseball game would have extra innings until someone wins. The weird thing about the All Star game this year was they implemented this new system. I am guessing because people didn't want to see a tie anymore. I don't disagree that since they had the homerun derby to see who won that technically that should give this guy a win. On the other hand it isn't how any other baseball game would be decided so I can see where the books, especially if they weren't aware of this, would just grade it as a tie. No one actually scored a run to win the game, like you would see in any other baseball game. This is why you don't fire off a big wager on games like this where it is an exhibition game and the rules are different. It obviously became a shit show grading. I would assume books will have a different take next time around so they don't get caught with their pants down again. The guy should have a win but I can see where books will try to use this one weird occurrence as a scapegoat.
                        Comment
                        • Optional
                          Administrator
                          • 06-10-10
                          • 61329

                          #13
                          Originally posted by unde0087

                          There isn't much to explain. A typical baseball game would have extra innings until someone wins. The weird thing about the All Star game this year was they implemented this new system. I am guessing because people didn't want to see a tie anymore. I don't disagree that since they had the homerun derby to see who won that technically that should give this guy a win. On the other hand it isn't how any other baseball game would be decided so I can see where the books, especially if they weren't aware of this, would just grade it as a tie. No one actually scored a run to win the game, like you would see in any other baseball game. This is why you don't fire off a big wager on games like this where it is an exhibition game and the rules are different. It obviously became a shit show grading. I would assume books will have a different take next time around so they don't get caught with their pants down again. The guy should have a win but I can see where books will try to use this one weird occurrence as a scapegoat.
                          Thanks Unde. Appreciate you helping me understand the situation better.
                          .
                          Comment
                          • ProSportsEdge
                            SBR Hustler
                            • 05-01-25
                            • 90

                            #14
                            Originally posted by 2Sweeet
                            Some places paid some didin't. I personally think it should be a Push. I don't think most books were aware this was going to happen if the game was tied.
                            yeah i agree, felt like a surprise twist no one saw coming most books seemed just as confused as the rest of us.
                            Comment
                            • Optional
                              Administrator
                              • 06-10-10
                              • 61329

                              #15
                              If I was advocating for this guy I would still be arguing that an official result was declared and the bet slip clearly shows that the odds were offered with a result required, even if extra innings are needed. Any sort of shoot out or tie break decider the league chooses meets the intent of that bet offering. It's disingenuous to say a home run derby as the extra innings either changes the bet odds or causes any palpable confusion for bettors.
                              Last edited by Optional; Today, 06:52 AM.
                              .
                              Comment
                              • Chiefs83
                                SBR MVP
                                • 08-01-16
                                • 2802

                                #16
                                Please list ALL books that Voided this bet, trying to recoup some money if the book graded there results as a Void & a Loss

                                Did anyone have the run line Voided, & at which bookie???
                                Comment
                                • pavyracer
                                  SBR Aristocracy
                                  • 04-12-07
                                  • 82710

                                  #17
                                  What they needed to do is have different rules for this game as it was just a single game. Like in the parenthesis (incl. extra innings) should have said (all bets voided if tie after 9 innings). But maybe this was done intentionally to refund winners and collect from losers. This is what needs to be investigated and if true avoid this book at all costs.
                                  Comment
                                  • 2Sweeet
                                    SBR MVP
                                    • 08-31-22
                                    • 1200

                                    #18
                                    I had one book BetmGM grade it as a push I had another Book Bet105 grade it as a loss I had AL.
                                    Comment
                                    • 2Sweeet
                                      SBR MVP
                                      • 08-31-22
                                      • 1200

                                      #19
                                      I no FD and DK graded it as a winner or a loser from ppl I no.
                                      Comment
                                      • Chiefs83
                                        SBR MVP
                                        • 08-01-16
                                        • 2802

                                        #20
                                        BallyBet graded my NL wager Run Line wager -1.5 a loss
                                        BetRivers graded my Live bet AL +2.5 a winner
                                        Last edited by Chiefs83; Today, 03:42 PM. Reason: Added other books
                                        Comment
                                        SBR Contests
                                        Collapse
                                        Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
                                        Collapse
                                        Working...