Oregon Favored by 9 Over Washington in Pac 12 Championship Game

**budwiser** · 12-01-23, 05:00 PM

Originally posted by DJK

Something fishy going on with this game which the books may know that we don't.

At DraftKings, I have numerous parlays pending and DK normally offers me Cash Out on all of them at various amounts.

It just happens that any parlay that has the Oregon Moneyline in it, they are NOT offering me a Cash Out at all as they all say "Cash Out Suspended" which leads me to believe that they think Oregon is going to lose SU.

I just may have to hedge out and bet Washington for the wagered amounts (or more) on all of the parlays with Oregon ML in them.

strange, the line did drop from 10 to 9 this morning but that shouldn't be enough for them to limit cash outs

**budwiser** · 12-01-23, 05:07 PM

rodemaker for fla state may be out, why the fla state line keeps falling

**ThaTopMoron** · 12-01-23, 05:25 PM

I'm on Oregon -7. I paid that juice. Oregon and Michigan are the teams who haven't failed me but once this season.

money makers

don't get fukkn hurt Bo

**homie1975** · 12-01-23, 07:02 PM

i have leaned WASH + the points all week,

however,

ORE simply a runaway freight train right now in all 3 phases of the game (save for their D vs USC recently)
and i think they have the better coach and QB.

if if if you forced me to bet i take WASH plus the points based on neutral field and them feeling disrespected as big dogs to their rival who they already beat.......but NO PLAY for me.

GL to all who play this

**ThaTopMoron** · 12-01-23, 07:30 PM

also, if both teams start out hot on their first drives and make plays and move the ball and score a TD... bet the live over at that point in time. then the defenses will settle in and start to make plays

live under 73.5 would be real nice

**budwiser** · 12-01-23, 08:38 PM

i saw 2 clear and obvious holds on the huskies secondary as washington if they are going to allow washington secondary to.hold they have a shot

**DJK** · 12-01-23, 08:43 PM

Hate to say it, but Oregon is toast.

Looks to me like Washington wins straight up, so my hedge bets are in good shape.

**DJK** · 12-01-23, 08:50 PM

Damn, Washington came to play.

**stevenash** · 12-01-23, 09:33 PM

Ducks are dead money.

**budwiser** · 12-01-23, 09:44 PM

looks like refs made up.for it bs pi on Washington gave ducks a td. would have been 4th and long

**ThaWoj** · 12-01-23, 09:45 PM

Will there ever be a day when refs don't ruin sports?

**stevenash** · 12-01-23, 09:48 PM

Bo Nix's mom is hot.

**ThaTopMoron** · 12-01-23, 09:49 PM

Oregon +290

**johnnyvegas13** · 12-01-23, 09:56 PM

If Washington loses that phantom PI call will get talked about

worst I seen in a while

**teecee** · 12-01-23, 11:30 PM

Instead of playing Washington m/l, I just took Penix for Heisman at +1600. What is the prevailing opinion on whether that cashes if they happen to win this matchup?

**stevenash** · 12-01-23, 11:44 PM

Better team won.

**gauchojake** · 12-01-23, 11:49 PM

Can't believe this is the end of the Pac 12.

RIP

**DJK** · 12-02-23, 12:04 AM

Originally posted by DJK

Something fishy going on with this game which the books may know that we don't.

At DraftKings, I have numerous parlays pending and DK normally offers me Cash Out on all of them at various amounts.

It just happens that any parlay that has the Oregon Moneyline in it, they are NOT offering me a Cash Out at all as they all say "Cash Out Suspended" which leads me to believe that they think Oregon is going to lose SU.

I just may have to hedge out and bet Washington for the wagered amounts (or more) on all of the parlays with Oregon ML in them.

Isn't it obvious that DK knew Oregon would most likely lose SU to not offer cashout on any of my parlays with the Oregon ML in them?

What the hell is it that they knew that the most of the public didn't?

My initial inkling was to take the plus ML on Washington but couldn't pull the trigger so took Washington on the spread instead.

I won something but it could have been 3X instead.

**homie1975** · 12-02-23, 12:09 AM

Originally posted by teecee

Instead of playing Washington m/l, I just took Penix for Heisman at +1600. What is the prevailing opinion on whether that cashes if they happen to win this matchup?

No Chance of Penix the Heisman.

None.

Bo and Jayden way ahead of him.

He lost when they barely beat ASU at home by 8 points and he threw 2 Int's and 0 TDs.

**stevenash** · 12-02-23, 12:13 AM

Originally posted by gauchojake

Can't believe this is the end of the Pac 12.

RIP

NCAA football won't be the same, oh sure those BIG 10 games will be terrific, but still.

**actiondan** · 12-02-23, 12:59 AM

Originally posted by BobbyBazuka

By the way if Oregon gets left out I am a school shooter.

uh oh

**budwiser** · 12-02-23, 08:22 AM

Originally posted by DJK

Isn't it obvious that DK knew Oregon would most likely lose SU to not offer cashout on any of my parlays with the Oregon ML in them?

What the hell is it that they knew that the most of the public didn't?

My initial inkling was to take the plus ML on Washington but couldn't pull the trigger so took Washington on the spread instead.

I won something but it could have been 3X instead.

crazy and yeah good catch.

**budwiser** · 12-02-23, 08:24 AM

as i said Washington was allowed to hold the oregon receivers. jerseys being pulled no call

that's the game because Oregon passing attack depends on timing

**JAKEPEAVY21** · 12-02-23, 08:36 AM

Originally posted by stevenash

Better team won.

Hard to argue that with Washington beating them twice, nasher.

Washington came out with a purpose and were the more physical team.

Oregon looked like they were just going through the motions and didn't match the Huskies intensity.

That Rb, Dillon Johnson, had a very gutty performance while hobbling in between plays...physical runner looks like he will have a future in the NFL.

I had Oregon winning but going to root for Washington in the playoff now.

**johnnyvegas13** · 12-02-23, 08:40 AM

Washington in a good thing for other playoff team

they r basically this years tcu

**JAKEPEAVY21** · 12-02-23, 08:52 AM

Originally posted by johnnyvegas13

Washington in a good thing for other playoff team

they r basically this years tcu

Disagree, they might lose but are way better than TCU was last year...better QB, more physical in the trenches, better WRS....I can go on

**homie1975** · 12-02-23, 03:12 PM

Originally posted by johnnyvegas13

Washington in a good thing for other playoff team

they r basically this years tcu

better than TCU last year IMO but could be in trouble in the playoffs against some of the big boys.

**homie1975** · 12-02-23, 03:14 PM

Originally posted by JAKEPEAVY21

Disagree, they might lose but are way better than TCU was last year...better QB, more physical in the trenches, better WRS....I can go on

I agree they are better but not by much.

TCU played everyone well and handled Michigan man for man at the L.O.S.

only Georgia last year pushed TCU around.

the Washington that showed up at home vs ASU and Wazzu, worries me.

**Eddy Munny** · 12-02-23, 03:48 PM

Originally posted by homie1975

I agree they are better but not by much.

TCU played everyone well and handled Michigan man for man at the L.O.S.

only Georgia last year pushed TCU around.

the Washington that showed up at home vs ASU and Wazzu, worries me.

I don't really think TCU "handled" Michigan at the L.O.S. I think it was just a perfect storm of events to pull the upset. Michigan wins that game 8-9 out of 10 times. The one they played on that day happened to be one of those 1 or 2 out of 10.

**Eddy Munny** · 12-02-23, 03:50 PM

Now if Alabama wins and FSU wins, we very well could see an SEC-free championship playoffs.

You can't shutout the Horns given the aforementioned scenario, nor can you shutout an undefeated FSU.

I'm assuming a Michigan win in all of this of course.

**Easy-Rider 66** · 12-02-23, 03:50 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

I don't really think TCU "handled" Michigan at the L.O.S. I think it was just a perfect storm of events to pull the upset. Michigan wins that game 8-9 out of 10 times. The one they played on that day happened to be one of those 1 or 2 out of 10.

agreed Eddy turnovers were big factor I believe

**homie1975** · 12-02-23, 03:57 PM

Originally posted by Eddy Munny

I don't really think TCU "handled" Michigan at the L.O.S. I think it was just a perfect storm of events to pull the upset. Michigan wins that game 8-9 out of 10 times. The one they played on that day happened to be one of those 1 or 2 out of 10.

watch the tape again and read what i wrote. handled them man for man.

in other words, they neutralized the OL v DL advantage on both sides of the L.O.S.

so UM abandoned the running game and tried some trickeration which they did not need to do against anyone else all year, not even Ohio St.

oh yeah, and UM did not have the TCU signals

**homie1975** · 12-02-23, 03:58 PM

Originally posted by Easy-Rider 66

agreed Eddy turnovers were big factor I believe

caused by TCU stopping the UM running game and forcing UM to pass and they confused JJ with stunts and blitzes.

**Eddy Munny** · 12-02-23, 04:15 PM

Originally posted by homie1975

caused by TCU stopping the UM running game and forcing UM to pass and they confused JJ with stunts and blitzes.

It was more than that, though. I don't recall the game play for play at this point but it was marred by stuff I would call flukey. Like the Quentin Johnston long touchdown that was simply a sideline route and a missed tackle but covered like 70 yards. And given all the circus plays, Michigan still had a chance at the very end.

TCU deserved to win that day, but I don't think it was representative of how those teams actually were.