-
Comment -
^@Header
No, it's OK.
I laughed out truth be told.
Said to myself "when he reaches for the personal fat wife jokes, he's officially tilted"
Not offended at my wife is not 200 lbs, and I have a monster rooster.
(yeah, that was a rather lame attempt to get under my skin, but like his life if was an epic fail.
This is the post that was the knockout post.
The one I knew would do it.
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.Comment -
Hey guys, I heard morino is actually -33.9 units in this thread, is that true?Comment -
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.Comment -
^
Comment -
Yoy just spent 20 minutes typing 2 oag s to me you dumb shit. I own you.^@Header
No, it's OK.
I laughed out truth be told.
Said to myself "when he reaches for the personal fat wife jokes, he's officially tilted"
Not offended at my wife is not 200 lbs, and I have a monster rooster.
(yeah, that was a rather lame attempt to get under my skin, but like his life if was an epic fail.
This is the post that was the knockout post.
The one I knew would do it.
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.
I obliterate you in every debate.
You literally spent a month arguing that Calvin Ridley is an elite receiver.Comment -
^@Header
No, it's OK.
I laughed out truth be told.
Said to myself "when he reaches for the personal fat wife jokes, he's officially tilted"
Not offended at my wife is not 200 lbs, and I have a monster rooster.
(yeah, that was a rather lame attempt to get under my skin, but like his life if was an epic fail.
This is the post that was the knockout post.
The one I knew would do it.
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.Wrong, those aren't my records. Dumb shitsOriginally posted by mjsuax13Comment -
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.Comment -
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.Comment -
Here’s a challenge for you MO, let’s start one single thread January 1, 2022.
1. You post every single play you make with a ticket/$500 a play.
2. I fade every single play you make with a ticket/500 a play.
3. On January 1 2023 LOSER LEAVES FORUM FOREVER.
One full year of plays/fades and lets fukking see who wins. I have a feeling you won’t be happy with this result. As you love to say, 25 plays mean nothing. 50 plays prove nothing, blah blah blah. One full year. Literally- you can win here if you are “strong across the board”
I’ll even allow any poster of your choice to make the bet for me in my account to confirm.Comment -
Let me help you during the holidays as I know you’re broke and obviously lonely. PM me your btc address and I’ll send you Xmas bonus.😂😂😂Comment -
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge morono
Thomorono you are a huge moronoComment -
Hey Corky?
have you read this yet?
And this is what I've been trying to say to the happy fella the past two years.
"If you volume bet like this and lay ridiculous juice it's goin to ruin you" (if he is indeed betting real money)
Look at the results. Point proven.
This is one case in many.
Last season (I'm sure you're all aware of this) he made a futures bet that defied all mathematical logic.
He laid 6.5 to 5 that the Knicks would not make the playoff at the all star break.
I'll cut to the chase, I (since this is pretty much what I do for a living) broke down his bet from every math angle using stone cold hard data that this was a terrible idea.
After proving out the math to him I said "you're laying 6.5 to 5 (-130) against on a prop bet your should be receiving 3:2 (+150) for. You're flushing 80 cents in vig down the toilet"
Instead of thanking me for my sound, highly professional advice, for the next two weeks I was peppered with "dumb shit" and "that's not how math works" yadda, yadda, yadda"
End result, the prop bet lost, lost miserably I may add, just the way I broke it down for him.
And he does this all the time.
And I have many more examples of these.
I'll now await for his usual reply of "dumb shit"
And I really don't care about how many letter t's are in a particular word, or who he thinks is a WR1 or not, that's never been the issue, that's just his childish way of deflecting, it doesn't bother me because I consider the source where it's coming from. I just laugh at it.
He think he's the victim here, doesn't like it when we return the favor for him trashing our threads originally unprovoked all along.
Hey Corky?
You welcome debates with substance you say?
OK, let's debate, just bear in mind I have 200 links (that's right 200) of proof that you've always been the instigator.
Why? Just in case you want to make an issue out of anything.
Change your ways or get out.Comment
