Teamrankings MLB picks

[bettingman6]

Are they worth buying in order to fade their picks?

505 out of their 645 moneyline picks were for favorites last year. And they won just 45.11% of their picks. I don't know how such a thing is even possible. Seriously, when you pick favorites that often, it would be bad enough to win 50% of your bets.

https://www.teamrankings.com/mlb/betting-models/detailed-splits/

[jjgold]

nope

juice is why fading does not work

[bettingman6]

nope

juice is why fading does not work

If you win at a 55% rate while picking underdogs 78% of the time, you’re beating the juice.

Even if last year was untypically bad, and teamrankings goes 50% next year while still picking favorites 78% of the time, fading them would beat the juice.

[danshan11]

JJ is right, there are 2 kinds of cappers
winners long term cant fade them obvious reasons
losers long term and they only lose the juice long term so fading them you would lose the juice too
now if you could find a bad capper that somehow was making picks that did terrible against the line enough to overcome the juice, fading could work, but that would be a very rare find.

[jets96]

Dan Dan Dan , or follow the leader brother .

[jjgold]

stop looking for gimmicks

there are none

[danshan11]

Dan Dan Dan , or follow the leader brother .

what do you mean?

[asiagambler]

I've yet to find someone that picks <48% longterm. I think worst is 49%. Best maybe 54%.

[jjgold]

lol that site is a joke

jokers run it that never made a bet in their lives