-
Comment -
Not that I care what you think but I've posted in 5 sports, and I'm positive or basically even in 4 of the 5. I'm positive or even in 4 of the 5 threads I've posted. College football, WNBA, NFL, MLB, NBA.Comment -
You don't get it guy, or you are trolling.
Mistakes are mistakes, who cares if you are off 1.4 units? Nobody even cars whether you are winning or losing. None of that matters.
What you're not getting is that your approach to tracking and cavalier attitude towards mistakes show something needs to be learned, but you're anger and responses imply that you have something to hide.
Again, you either don't get it and won't, or you are trolling.
Carry on guy, but don't think I tried to help you over you leaving one game out of your "record" because I was trying to help you with a much bigger problem.
Comment -
Fuk off
You don't get it guy, or you are trolling.
Mistakes are mistakes, who cares if you are off 1.4 units? Nobody even cars whether you are winning or losing. None of that matters.
What you're not getting is that your approach to tracking and cavalier attitude towards mistakes show something needs to be learned, but you're anger and responses imply that you have something to hide.
Again, you either don't get it and won't, or you are trolling.
Carry on guy, but don't think I tried to help you over you leaving one game out of your "record" because I was trying to help you with a much bigger problem.
Comment -
Comment -
how can someone tell people to fuk off all day and still be allowed to post?
and this is the same person that got a free trip from sbr and tried to sell it on the forumComment -
I'm responding to trolls like you Milwaukee Mike, and you've been caught lying repeatedly about me - including in the post where you claim I was an ex-felon, I could care less, but if anything you should be kicked off.Comment -
thomorino getting cornered by all these SBR Pro's
thomorino - next thread you make, use the "Non-Pro Only" function
GLComment -
Eh not cornering, trollingComment -
I tried to help the guy, answered another posters question and pointed out a mistake.
I was told to fuk off.
I was not trolling but I admit that morino sure trolled me, and others with this thread.
Crafty guy, crafty.
Good LuckComment -
Not that I care, but what the fuk are you talking about - I don't send or receive messages, but I have no clue why I wouldn't be able to - the original issue was I challenged someone to a bet you dumbass, nothing to do with honesty or integrity.Comment -
3-0 to go to -10.35 units.
I like
Philadelphia -102 risking 1.02 units to win 1 unit
Arizona run line at 1.5 +120 to win 1 unit
Dodgers at -132 risking 2.6 units to win 2 units
Houston -110 risking 1.10 unit to win 1 unitComment -
Sure you're not risking 2.64 units on Dodgers?Comment -
Not that I care, I never tried to sell anything, I offered to transfer my credit for free, shut the fuk up.Comment -
Fuk offComment -
I'm adding for tomorrow
Cubs betting to win 1 unit
Houston run line at +110 betting to win 1 unit
Cubs-Pirates under 8 betting to win 1 unitComment -
I'm not even sure where to begin with all this.
So, there was an error from a previous day. Ok. But, your idea of correcting it is to fudge the numbers for the current day to account for it, with no indication of what you are doing? Really? It would seem like basic common sense would suggest that you would want to (1) Indicate that you are correcting a previous error, and (2) State the corrected total first, then provide an accurate summary of the current day.
Now, your approach would be confusing enough if you could do the math correctly and actually apply the proper adjustment. But you can't.
No, it doesn't. For starters, the difference between the two amounts was 1.81, not 1.6. Secondly, the difference between your Milwaukee bet plus a 1 unit correction is 1.23 units, which does not equal 1.6. Nor does it equal the actual correct number of 1.81. So no, your results are not accurate.
Then again...
If you are using the +/-1 is close enough philosophy of math, then I guess all of the above actually is correct. I mean, -8.2 + 1 does in fact equal -6.2 ..... +/-1.
If that's your idea of accurate math, then: (1) Yes, use a spreadsheet. It will do actual correct math for you, and hopefully save you a lot of grief. (2) Like i said before, how it could possibly surprise you that people are skeptical of your posted results is beyond me.Comment -
Are you really this stupid - I said that my record was down 1 more unit than it should have been 3 days ago, I also said the Milwaukee bet at +130 was to win 1 unit not a 1 unit bet. Therefore, that accounts for the discrepancy which was nothing anyways - roughly 1.3 units.I'm not even sure where to begin with all this.
So, there was an error from a previous day. Ok. But, your idea of correcting it is to fudge the numbers for the current day to account for it, with no indication of what you are doing? Really? It would seem like basic common sense would suggest that you would want to (1) Indicate that you are correcting a previous error, and (2) State the corrected total first, then provide an accurate summary of the current day.
Now, your approach would be confusing enough if you could do the math correctly and actually apply the proper adjustment. But you can't.
No, it doesn't. For starters, the difference between the two amounts was 1.81, not 1.6. Secondly, the difference between your Milwaukee bet plus a 1 unit correction is 1.23 units, which does not equal 1.6. Nor does it equal the actual correct number of 1.81. So no, your results are not accurate.
Then again...
If you are using the +/-1 is close enough philosophy of math, then I guess all of the above actually is correct. I mean, -8.2 + 1 does in fact equal -6.2 ..... +/-1.
If that's your idea of accurate math, then: (1) Yes, use a spreadsheet. It will do actual correct math for you, and hopefully save you a lot of grief. (2) Like i said before, how it could possibly surprise you that people are skeptical of your posted results is beyond me.Comment -
These people are trolls from previous threads - not have any credibility. I mean you just spent what looks like 30 minutes arguing that my record keeping is off by less than half unit - get a life dude.I'm not even sure where to begin with all this.
So, there was an error from a previous day. Ok. But, your idea of correcting it is to fudge the numbers for the current day to account for it, with no indication of what you are doing? Really? It would seem like basic common sense would suggest that you would want to (1) Indicate that you are correcting a previous error, and (2) State the corrected total first, then provide an accurate summary of the current day.
Now, your approach would be confusing enough if you could do the math correctly and actually apply the proper adjustment. But you can't.
No, it doesn't. For starters, the difference between the two amounts was 1.81, not 1.6. Secondly, the difference between your Milwaukee bet plus a 1 unit correction is 1.23 units, which does not equal 1.6. Nor does it equal the actual correct number of 1.81. So no, your results are not accurate.
Then again...
If you are using the +/-1 is close enough philosophy of math, then I guess all of the above actually is correct. I mean, -8.2 + 1 does in fact equal -6.2 ..... +/-1.
If that's your idea of accurate math, then: (1) Yes, use a spreadsheet. It will do actual correct math for you, and hopefully save you a lot of grief. (2) Like i said before, how it could possibly surprise you that people are skeptical of your posted results is beyond me.Comment -
Lol, I know who you are now cycling bettor, you were one of the people arguing topbet was broke last year who lost the argument when topbet pulled through and paid nearly everyone, including me. I've been paid over 3k by topbet since last Septemeber when idiots like you, Milwaukee Mike, the 5im thought they were broke.
I owned you like a bitch so know you're here staying up all night to find a half a unit discrepancy in my threads - get a life dude - you're pathetic.
You lost the argument - move on dude.Comment
