this is bigly bad. not covfefe. sad.
Net Neutrality
Collapse
X
-
SportsMushroomSBR MVP
- 09-28-10
- 4177
#36Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#37obama protected net neutrality because he understood how important it is to free speech, democracy, and to the quality of life of the average citizen
trump is overturning the legislation because it is an obama legislation, so it must be bad, that is the extent of trumps intellect and reasoning
and you dont like net neutrality because obama supported it, that is the extent of your intellect and reasoning
anyhow you will understand how important net neutrality is when sbr becomes slower to u.s, residents, or even inaccessible
have you noticed that trend over the years?
Comment -
SportsMushroomSBR MVP
- 09-28-10
- 4177
#38
your only argument was literally 'obama like net neutrality. obama hate america.l obama hate white man. net neutrality bad. me hungry. me go eat banana'
its not difficult to see your iq is in the same range as the pussygrabber's... single digitComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#39well, you have offered no reasoning as why net neutrality is bad, or why ending it would be good
your only argument was literally 'obama like net neutrality. obama hate america.l obama hate white man. net neutrality bad. me hungry. me go eat banana'
its not difficult to see your iq is in the same range as the pussygrabber's... single digit
Again, have you notice the trend that when it comes to obama you get nothing right? Years long trend, one of the strongest on the site.
it's that stupid, useless media you have in australia.
and the point about obama is an IQ test. If you can't see that you must be a terrible gambler and terrible at spotting trends. The same lying sack of rkelly who illegally passed obamacare, made an illegal hostage payment and broke records for amount of lies in office is telling you net neutrality is for your own good. All while you're too dumb to realize the government is positioning to control it.Last edited by brooks85; 11-23-17, 12:35 AM.Comment -
thechaozSBR Posting Legend
- 10-23-09
- 12154
#40If we lose Net Neutrality, you would be limited from accessing services that don't make an agreement with your ISP... possibly by bandwidth caps or throttled, slowed connections.
Also the VoIP traffic would be degraded and more than likely you would have to ask your mom to get you a landline so can still call Coach.
So do you think it's good or bad, Otters?
You have to be a idiot to believe otherwiseComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#42Here is a simple test because some people clearly don't get the game yet.
If the MSM is telling you something then truth is the opposite.
It's not complicated, there is nothing to over-think. That doesn't even factor in Obama being a lying sack of rkelly or the long history of government invention leading to disasters. IF the MSM tells you a story then you can rest assure it's BS unless... it's the follow up story that they MAYBE run one time to admit they lied the first time like obama's illegal hostage payment or that time the cops slaughtered all those bikers in front of that restaurant in 2015. Does anyone here actually believe the 9/11 story still?
If anyone needs me to explain santa clause isn't real either let me know. Exactly the same concepts here. Children believe in santa clause, adults believe in the "news." And the worst part is the sheep call idiots like john oliver, steve colbert and that other douche the news.Last edited by brooks85; 11-23-17, 12:45 AM.Comment -
thechaozSBR Posting Legend
- 10-23-09
- 12154
#43Why is net neutrality a partisan issue? It shouldn't even be a debateComment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#44Comment -
antifoilSBR MVP
- 11-11-09
- 3993
#45Brooks doesn’t believe anything he post on politics. He is a high level troll and has been doing it to you guys for years.Comment -
SportsMushroomSBR MVP
- 09-28-10
- 4177
#47
but if the orange pussygrabber says it then is must be true
give me a break
scientologists are less brainwashed than trump supporters
internet providers already have either an oligopoly or a monopoly in every city in the united states, which is what happens when you dont regulate companies properly, and all the more reason to not give these companies even greater powers by deregulating even moreLast edited by SportsMushroom; 11-23-17, 04:58 AM.Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#48but if the orange pussygrabber says it then is must be true
give me a break
scientologists are less brainwashed than trump supporters
internet providers already have either an oligopoly or a monopoly in every city in the united states, which is what happens when you dont regulate companies properly, and all the more reason to not give these companies even greater powers by deregulating even more
great work proving what a low IQer you are! TDS is an hilarious disease.
Again, if I had known you low IQers were begging to be conned I would have entered politics. I was under the impression people don't like being made the fool over and over but people like you thrive on it.Last edited by brooks85; 11-23-17, 09:27 AM.Comment -
BluehorseshoeSBR Posting Legend
- 07-13-06
- 14996
#49TRUMP ADMINISTRATION, IN A GIFT TO TELECOM FIRMS, IS PULLING THE PLUG ON NET NEUTRALITY
The FCC rolled out its plan on Tuesday to kill off net neutrality. In doing so, there's a high chance that millions of American consumers will see price increases in internet service and a rise in online censorship.
David LazarusDavid LazarusContact Reporter
Black Friday is still a couple of days away, but the Trump administration already has handed out gifts to the telecom industry.
The Republican-controlled Federal Communications Commission on Wednesday took the wraps off its rollback of net neutrality rules, which it will finalize next month and give internet service providers more control over what you see online.
The FCC also passed a new rule on robocalls, which sounds like a good thing for consumers but probably isn’t.
Net neutrality is the sort of high-tech, policy-wonk issue that may cause people’s eyes to glaze over, but it’s really important for internet users.
At its heart, net neutrality is about guaranteeing a level playing field for all online services and content providers. It ensures that broadband providers such as phone and cable companies can’t give preferential treatment to anyone — their own streaming-video service, say, over Netflix or Amazon Prime Video.
The Obama administration saw such favoritism as a big enough threat that it passed regulations in 2015 prohibiting internet service companies from interfering with the content flowing over their networks.
Now President Trump’s appointee as FCC chairman, Ajit Pai, is proposing to gut those rules, which he said have “depressed investment in building and expanding broadband networks and deterred innovation."
His stance on net neutrality is expected to be backed by the commission’s Republican majority at a Dec. 14 meeting.
Pai said this week it was a mistake for the Obama administration to impose “heavy-handed, utility-style regulations upon the internet.” He uses that phrase a lot — “heavy-handed” — as if the government has no business telling huge telecom companies what to do.
This, just days after the Justice Department sued AT&T over that company’s planned takeover of Time Warner, arguing that the deal would be bad for consumers.
Under the FCC’s plan, Pai said, “the federal government will stop micromanaging the internet” and will “simply require internet service providers to be transparent about their practices so that consumers can buy the service plan that’s best for them.”
Because, as you know, there are so many different broadband providers competing for your business. (Sarcasm alert.)
Democratic Commissioner Mignon Clyburn called Pai’s rule change “a cornucopia full of rotten fruit, stale grains and wilted flowers topped off with a plate full of burnt turkey.”
She said the so-called Restoring Internet Freedom Order “would dismantle net neutrality as we know it by giving the green light to our nation’s largest broadband providers to engage in anti-consumer practices, including blocking, slowing down traffic, and paid prioritization of online applications and services.”
Take a look around and you’ll see why Team Trump has this all wrong.
Cable giant Comcast owns NBCUniversal’s movies and TV shows, and in September it launched a streaming-video service called Xfinity Instant TV that features a variety of cable channels.
Under current rules, Comcast couldn’t provide more reliable access to its own service or slow down rival streaming signals from the likes of Sling TV. There are no broadband fast lanes.
After Pai’s rule change takes effect, however, there would be nothing to stop Comcast from fiddling with your feed, making the prospect of broadband fast lanes — and deliberate traffic jams — very much a reality.
Comment -
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#50"After Pai’s rule change takes effect, however, there would be nothing to stop Comcast from fiddling with your feed, making the prospect of broadband fast lanes — and deliberate traffic jams — very much a reality."
so for those who didn't know before, what do you know now thanks to me?
"Here is a simple test because some people clearly don't get the game yet.
If the MSM is telling you something then truth is the opposite.
It's not complicated, there is nothing to over-think. That doesn't even factor in Obama being a lying sack of rkelly or the long history of government invention leading to disasters. IF the MSM tells you a story then you can rest assure it's BS unless... it's the follow up story that they MAYBE run one time to admit they lied the first time like obama's illegal hostage payment or that time the cops slaughtered all those bikers in front of that restaurant in 2015. Does anyone here actually believe the 9/11 story still?
If anyone needs me to explain santa clause isn't real either let me know. Exactly the same concepts here. Children believe in santa clause, adults believe in the "news." And the worst part is the sheep call idiots like john oliver, steve colbert and that other douche the news."Comment -
PittsburghPlayerSBR Hall of Famer
- 01-11-10
- 6760
#51My understanding is that it will be even more like 1984
the book, not the year
essentially the more you rely on the internet and television for entertainment or to keep you amused, the more
you`re going to pay and be observed/tracked (think smart televisions/phones/refrigerators/security/electrical systems...
(wonder if they will ever have a smart (driverless) car?
no? good, like you, I an fond of driving!!))
all so that they can determine who is welcome to take part in the NWO in 2 or 3 years
as we enter a cashless society ...
we have a bumpy ride ahead, but that is of no shock to any of us here!
Paul Harvey, good day!Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16015
-
Fidel_CashFlowSBR Aristocracy
- 12-03-12
- 53970
#53Otters knew in JulyComment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#54Did they merge your thread Fidel?Comment -
Fidel_CashFlowSBR Aristocracy
- 12-03-12
- 53970
#57Deleted my thread
everyone for themselvesComment -
PauulzcappinSBR Posting Legend
- 04-23-10
- 20295
#59why was fidel's thread deleted?Comment -
SnowballBARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 11-15-09
- 30047
#60threat
anyway.. the demise of net neutrality is just another example
of Trump's appointments all being corporate execs running the
agencies. Regulatory capture. Agencies meant to protect us
and the public interest are all controlled by Wall Street now.
It's the GOP way, and the Trump way.. fascist 100%.Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16015
#61threat
anyway.. the demise of net neutrality is just another example
of Trump's appointments all being corporate execs running the
agencies. Regulatory capture. Agencies meant to protect us
and the public interest are all controlled by Wall Street now.
It's the GOP way, and the Trump way.. fascist 100%.
So you think the govt deleted fidel’s thread?Comment -
Fidel_CashFlowSBR Aristocracy
- 12-03-12
- 53970
#62FidelCashFlow
remember that name and know what he stood for
Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#63So why was Fidel's thread deleted again? LOLComment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16015
#64Funny it was the feds
Fidel said they will take away SBR and charge us for porn.
Thread gone.Comment -
grease lightninSBR Posting Legend
- 10-01-12
- 16015
#65Fidel put the phone number back up and see if the feds will delete this one.Comment -
funnyb25BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 07-09-09
- 39663
#66They already charge us for porn. Internet billComment -
rkelly110BARRELED IN @ SBR!
- 10-05-09
- 39691
#67Gotta love when I get so far into a kids brain he has to interject my name in every post. Winnin'!Comment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22296
#68You would be stunned what these imbeciles believe. Somehow this will be turned against the democrats and these idiots will think it was the democrats who voted for this. U see the head imbecile on the site trying to spin it with one of the most idiotic post in sports post history. These guys are this dumb. Heck they are champion this terrible tax cut where they are gonna get fuked and they don’t even know it. Unfortunately we get fuked to because we have to live on the same earth with these jackasses.Comment -
Thor4140SBR Posting Legend
- 02-09-08
- 22296
-
brooks85SBR Aristocracy
- 01-05-09
- 44709
#70^hey the moron who thinks "planned parenthood" is "planet parenthood" trying to help out the other moron who can't read a stock chart. Notice the trend of how I've proven you are both liars.
no, you'd end up on youtube as an hilarious joke for your kids to see which is exactly why your cowardly ass won't show upComment
SBR Contests
Collapse
Top-Rated US Sportsbooks
Collapse
#1 BetMGM
4.8/5 BetMGM Bonus Code
#2 FanDuel
4.8/5 FanDuel Promo Code
#3 Caesars
4.8/5 Caesars Promo Code
#4 DraftKings
4.7/5 DraftKings Promo Code
#5 Fanatics
#6 bet365
4.7/5 bet365 Bonus Code
#7 Hard Rock
4.1/5 Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
#8 BetRivers
4.1/5 BetRivers Bonus Code