any way possible for jets +9.5 and the over hit tonight?

[seaborneq]

I have 600 reasons to pull for this tonight.

[firedawg]

Name one... Falcons win 34-10

[ByeShea]

If the Jets don't turn the ball over (big if) they could easily win the game with that monster D.

That said, if the Jets show up and they're in this game - it's a low scoring affair.

Downside to the Jets bet is if Atlanta gets an early lead. 3 quarters of Geno Smith trying to make things happen could mean Atlanta hitting the over without needing the Jets help.

I'm betting Jets small taking the points.

[seaborneq]

I figure if the jets get behind early it will go over. Geno throwing 40-50 passes gets the jets at least 17 points. The falcons defense is suspect and the offense is not clicking either

[seaborneq]

If I had to make a hedge one of the two plays, I would take the under

[t-wizzle]

Great chance. Lang teased Falcons and the Under.

[seaborneq]

Great chance. Lang teased Falcons and the Under.

That's what I want to hear.

[Rich Boy]

Jets will need to run the ball and keep this a clock milking low scoring type game. The last thing they want is Ryan putting up a few early TDs and then they have to open up the offense with Geno Smith.

Jets D should give them at least a chance at a back door cover late in the game

Im taking Jets +10 at even money

[seaborneq]

Feedback.

[detroitlionsfan]

it could happen

depends which geno shwos up for jets

[SpeedPro]

Since the concensus is about even I would go with the favorite.

[mike skinyeart]

I like the falcons big tonight 42-13 its a great spot to get on track they been struggling and need a win and to just start It tonight I think if the falcons were 4-0 jets would have a better shot im throwing 200 on the falcons....but its football and you never know I also threw 200 on the chargers last night!

[ridims]

Since the concensus is about even I would go with the favorite.

hahhahahahahahaha

now thats funny. far from even

[AdaBarber]

Since the concensus is about even I would go with the favorite.

We always find a way to not go with the favorite. The public loses most of the time. I took the Jets +10.

http://forum.sbrforum.com/nfl-betting/2567836-big-da-barber-nfl-against-public-weekly-hitters-p2.html

[seaborneq]

A touchdown by the falcons would have been nice

[seaborneq]

A touchdown by the jets will probably win this for me.

[seaborneq]

A touchdown would probably guarantee the jets cover, the over would be all that's left

[seaborneq]

I dont care who scores the next touchdown

[seaborneq]

Got it............ I think

[beringeyy]

[SteveRyan]

Jets and the over. Square fukkin city. I parlayed jets with under. Penetrating unbelievable

[Wojo]

it could happen

depends which geno shwos up for jets

That is an odd statement.

Geno Smith has had only four NFL games in his career!

[Wojo]

Jets and the over. Square fukkin city. I parlayed jets with under. Penetrating unbelievable

I guess you wish you were a square right now...................

Sorry for your "sharp loss"

[SteveRyan]

FYI-Overs are correlated with favs. Unders are correlated with dogs. The other alternatives are square.

[drfunkmaster]

congrats

[seaborneq]

Still in great shape

[TheSchafe]

Nice going. J E T S JETS JETS JETS!

[ChalkyDog]

This has to define sharp, right?

Congrats!

[Nicksweger42]

Yea dude, jets and under was the "sharp“ play... there is no such thing anymore with the internet and the public's knowledge of all the action.. can not stand people talking about what the public is playing, when they are in deed the public themselves...all there is, is the right or the wrong side.... get over yourselves wannabe sharps

[Wojo]

FYI-Overs are correlated with favs. Unders are correlated with dogs. The other alternatives are square.

A famous myth perpetrated by ignorant touts such as Fezzik, VR, and other touts.

Favs who covered went over the total 50.8% of the time since 1989.
Dogs who covered went under the total 50.8% of the time since 1989.

Yeah, you quoted an accurate "sharp" angle.

Why don't you have the supporting data before you make incorrect statements?

Are you a "square" trying to appear to be "sharp"?

[Dr.Gonzo]

A famous myth perpetrated by ignorant touts such as Fezzik, VR, and other touts.

Favs who covered went over the total 50.8% of the time since 1989.
Dogs who covered went under the total 50.8% of the time since 1989.

Yeah, you quoted an accurate "sharp" angle.

Why don't you have the supporting data before you make incorrect statements?

Are you a "square" trying to appear to be "sharp"?

What about double digit spreads?

[SteveRyan]

A famous myth perpetrated by ignorant touts such as Fezzik, VR, and other touts.

Favs who covered went over the total 50.8% of the time since 1989.
Dogs who covered went under the total 50.8% of the time since 1989.

Yeah, you quoted an accurate "sharp" angle.

Why don't you have the supporting data before you make incorrect statements?

Are you a "square" trying to appear to be "sharp"?

It's not an incorrect statement and the stats you show prove it. If you take Atlanta -10, you are assuming that they will play well and score a lot of points. If you take Jets +10 you are assuming that both teams will play poorly and keep it close.

Not to mention that you probably wont be playing 2 team parlays every week, but when you do, would you rather take the 50.8% side or the other?

Taking the Jets +10 and the over is square as fukk.

[TheMLBKing]

Name one... Falcons win 34-10

people like you are a cancer to this forum. I wonder how many suckers saw baseless posts like these and got suckered into taking falcons spread and the under.

[seaborneq]

I should take week off

[firedawg]

people like you are a cancer to this forum. I wonder how many suckers saw baseless posts like these and got suckered into taking falcons spread and the under.

you fukkin idiot............ look at my record you dousche