Washington Huskies +7 and ML +230

**No coincidences** · 09-25-12, 11:57 AM

Like it.

Paranoid about "balancing out" correction that's coming Canuck. You know what I mean.

**CanuckG** · 09-25-12, 12:01 PM

True....

**ngates815** · 09-25-12, 12:03 PM

ehh...

**Sunde91** · 09-25-12, 12:25 PM

One of the best plays of the year I'd think.

Stanford won their big early conference opener they had circled all offseason, shot their wad everywhere, now they're in their first road game with a terrible QB first time away from home in the loudest NFL stadium with a College crowd on a Thursday Night. Both teams off a bye. Stanford listened for 12 days about how good they are for beating SC at home in the worst game of Barkley's career.

Wash has been particularly unimpressive even against SDSU at home is the only concern.

If Stanford lost by DD to SC, this line is 3 or less. Couldn't draw up a better fade perception letdown spot.

**CanuckG** · 09-25-12, 12:29 PM

Wash looking bad at home vs SDSU isn't really that bad....as an athlete you can't get more fired up than this. They play USC at home and Huskies are always good for an upset at home and more likely to come vs Stanford...

**ridims** · 09-25-12, 02:17 PM

took em at +7.5 still great odds

**BigDeem5** · 09-25-12, 02:22 PM

Go get em nuker

**Trackrec** · 09-25-12, 02:35 PM

The latest blow came Monday when Sarkisian announced during his weekly news conference that sophomore guard Colin Tanigawa will be out for the season (apparently with a knee injury). Tanigawa did not play in UW's win over Portland State on Sept. 15 but his status was not clarified until Monday.
Tanigawa was a starter a year ago, one of four regulars on the 2011 line that projected to return this season.But three are out, two for the season.Joining Tanigawa on the sidelines is junior guard/tackle Erik Kohler, out indefinitely with a knee injury that dates to fall camp and was aggravated against LSU.And lost for good in the spring was junior guard Colin Porter, who was forced to give up football due to chronic shoulder issues.That leaves only senior center Drew Schaefer of the four returners who started last season. The other starter was left tackle Senio Kelemete, now with the Arizona Cardinals.

http://seattletimes.com/html/huskyfootball/2019251328_huskyfootball25.html

Stanford -7

**gojetsgomoxies** · 09-25-12, 02:36 PM

i like the analysis/idea but i think stanford is far superior team. i have to look into wash end. had such a porous D last year

**CanuckG** · 09-25-12, 02:39 PM

Originally posted by Trackrec

The latest blow came Monday when Sarkisian announced during his weekly news conference that sophomore guard Colin Tanigawa will be out for the season (apparently with a knee injury). Tanigawa did not play in UW's win over Portland State on Sept. 15 but his status was not clarified until Monday.
Tanigawa was a starter a year ago, one of four regulars on the 2011 line that projected to return this season.But three are out, two for the season.Joining Tanigawa on the sidelines is junior guard/tackle Erik Kohler, out indefinitely with a knee injury that dates to fall camp and was aggravated against LSU.And lost for good in the spring was junior guard Colin Porter, who was forced to give up football due to chronic shoulder issues.That leaves only senior center Drew Schaefer of the four returners who started last season. The other starter was left tackle Senio Kelemete, now with the Arizona Cardinals.

http://seattletimes.com/html/huskyfootball/2019251328_huskyfootball25.html

Stanford -7

Line should be Stanford -13 then right?

**Trackrec** · 09-25-12, 02:53 PM

Originally posted by CanuckG

Line should be Stanford -13 then right?

I don't know if -13 would be the right cap, however this line looks like a gift. I think the line is a false pretense to a tight game

**odog11** · 09-25-12, 11:28 PM

Thinking under the play here at first glance.

**paco** · 09-25-12, 11:31 PM

Washington couldn't stop a nose bleed as Bart would say

**BigDeem5** · 09-26-12, 12:00 AM

Canuck is Washington homer, but he may be on to something here.

**Ernie Mccracken** · 09-26-12, 12:04 AM

Washington is a very soft team, mentally. Very talented, but frustrating to watch. If they get down by a couple TD's, I would expect them to insta-fold.

**JMobile** · 09-26-12, 12:22 AM

Against Stanford??????

**pulledclear** · 09-26-12, 12:44 AM

Loved the play until I saw that Deemer

liked it.

**PAYTON20** · 09-26-12, 02:00 AM

God I Hope you're right Canuck

**Big Bear** · 09-26-12, 07:49 AM

cannuck are you a homer for washington?

**freewinners4u** · 09-26-12, 10:14 AM

yupp

**Smoke** · 09-26-12, 10:26 AM

....

**freewinners4u** · 09-26-12, 10:28 AM

they shouuld win big

**Snowball** · 09-26-12, 01:15 PM

If you like Washington to play well, then consider the Over 21.5
instead. Better chance of hitting that, imo.
I might take Overs in both Team Totals separately.

**Snowball** · 09-26-12, 02:09 PM

line dropped on TT"s, I just placed my bets...

taking Wash U Over 20.5
taking Stanford Over 27

50% each

**Sunde91** · 09-26-12, 02:20 PM

Stanford has a 50% passing QB in his 1st start ever on the road for an offense that is conservative to begin with. Stanford TT Over is terrible. TT Under is maybe a better bet than Wash points

**gojetsgomoxies** · 09-26-12, 02:24 PM

i stumbled across marc lawrence's weekly tout sheet (i like his preview magazine, not crazy about his angle-based analysis though). anyway, he has washington as 10 point SU winner.

**zoo youk** · 09-26-12, 02:25 PM

careful here canuck. i believe stanford is number 1 in nation against the rush if not def top 5 wjth that smashmouth style they love. UW very finess team and they have 5 OL hurt including three starters. price is going to be running for his life all night long

**gojetsgomoxies** · 09-26-12, 02:25 PM

Originally posted by zoo youk

careful here canuck. i believe stanford is number 1 in nation against the rush if not def top 5 wjth that smashmouth style they love. UW very finess team and they have 5 OL hurt including three starters. price is going to be running for his life all night long

i think stanford has a very good pass rush too.

**RudyRuetigger** · 09-26-12, 02:27 PM

line agrees, good bet.

pissed i got stanford -7

**gojetsgomoxies** · 09-26-12, 02:42 PM

this game is too much of a wildcard. i can see washington winning by 10 or stanford winning by 21 halfway thru the 2nd quarter............. so NO PLAY

**zoo youk** · 09-26-12, 02:49 PM

Originally posted by gojetsgomoxies

i think stanford has a very good pass rush too.

look at the havoc they reeked on the USC OL and Barkley. huge talent gap between SC and UW. imo these guys are gonna be in the backfield all night long

**Big Bear** · 09-26-12, 03:20 PM

didn't washington get curb stomped by LSU?

what makes anyone think they can hang with a team that beat the #1 team in the nation?

**Big Bear** · 09-26-12, 03:22 PM

if this was on a short week right after the USC game i could see your point. but Stanford has been practicing and studying film and game planning for 10 days.

there is not a chance that they come out unprepared. these are smart kids too with a good coach. they will not take washington lightly.

**Snowball** · 09-26-12, 04:03 PM

Originally posted by Sunde91

Stanford has a 50% passing QB in his 1st start ever on the road for an offense that is conservative to begin with. Stanford TT Over is terrible. TT Under is maybe a better bet than Wash points

then why does Vegas say they score 27 ?