Originally posted on 01/25/2013:

Quote Originally Posted by Hannibal View Post
James Kim is one of those idiots that love to think they can see something which no one else can.
It sounds like his entire analysis is based off a few lines from a bloodly elbow article where jack slack thinks glover could be the perfect opponent for rampage
http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2012/10/1...riking-display

What is your argument? that glover can only throw a wild overhand right and a wild left hook? and he is technically garbage?
How is his right hand wild or technically garbage? he throws it very hard and with excellent gauge of distance and timing. It's tight and his head dips off center when he throws it. It looks beastly and technically flawless. This isnt a jeremy stephens over hand right.
What about his left hook? Is that a wild a punch as well? it looks like a god damn mike tyson left hook. Which part of it is wild? does he over commit? is it not tight enough? hell his left hooks look stronger and tighter than rampage has ever looked

And what part of having the same go-to strikes make him a bad striker? Dan Henderson pretty much only has his right hand but it looks like it's been getting sharper and sharper over the years. He's able to time it perfectly and consistently find his opponent's chin even while they all know to expect the right hand. If Dan can consistently starch quality guys with a single variation of strike... why cant Glover do it with two?

Your entire thread is basically: " i can see a something that none of you guys can see.... that glover only throws the same two punches! and they are so wild! damn he is a technically atrocious striker he'll get KO'd by rampage! I'm 95% sure"
Some gamblers can analyze a fight, some gamblers cannot.
Here's my winning bet on analyzing a past fight:
http://www.sportsbookreview.com/forum/boxing-mma...jah-faber.html