Corelations, I believe, the ones casinos/books frown upon are regarding any line somewhere in the territory of 30%+ of the total for the same play. Right? Whereas Oregon -20 w a total of 60 cannot be bet minus and the over. We all know this gives too much advantage to the play.

Well, in NFL this is seldom seen, as lines never reach so high, but how about 2H lines? Perfect example is yesterdays Dallas Cowboys game. Down 13-0 at half. Line is -7 and total is 23. Not exactly in a correlated category as most NFL games aren't, because line is only 7.... BUT instead of looking at the 2H line, look at the score. Dallas is really looking at a 14 point line, realistically as far as their game goes, suffice to say they aren't looking to lose a close one, but to win. This skews the play in a huge way giving awesome value for a 2 teamer on Dallas -7 and over 23 2H. When looking at 2H point spreads look for games with a wide margin (obviously not so wide as the teams will quit) and factor in the difference between the point spread, and deficit the losing team is really looking at in order to win. This correlation comes to ya with a 100% guarantee 60% of the time. Thought?

BTW I'm not talking about teams like St. Louis getting rolled, more along the lines of those teams with ability to put points on the board somewhat consistently and weapons on the field. ESPECIALLY HOME FAVORITES LOSING BY 6 OR MORE POINTS . If anyone knows how to filter any stats/scores/shit like that id love to run some numbers through filters and all, but honestly I believe it would interfere with my schedule of chugging jack and butt raping broads