why is (Utah) vs Denver only - 6? IN GAME DISCUSSION

[hoopster42]

people think that the team who lost gm 1 just must come back and play well in gm 2, it's false hope, utah is down and out, i played denver in a tease -1, i think they win and take a 2-0 lead

[yisman]

I'm also very confused by the line.

Denver has handled Utah this season.

win by 9
win by 10
win by 7
loss by 10
win by 13

So they would cover this line in four of the five previous matchups (the loss/non-cover was at Utah), and now Utah is without Kirilenko and Okur. Not sure what to think here.

[yisman]

I don't really get it either, Utah is missing a lot of key players to keep them in the play offs. I don't see Utah even winning a game...

now this I disagree with.

Utah is a very good home team and I believe they win at least one.

[TheAccountant]

Utah is definitely missing some pieces, but I would be pretty suprised if Melo goes off like he did in the first. I think they have the potential to hang close, maybe even win GM 2.

[yisman]

I think so too..question is whether to take the ML or the points..

How is this a question? If you think they will win, you take the ML. Don't think twice.

[ZetaPsi808]

flip flop theory applies here. Utah plus the points

[yisman]

rolling with denver - the points

[rm18]

taking Jazz +350 on 2nd half ML for fun

[big joe 1212]

Denver is playing like its November

[hoopster42]