Jazz -1.5???

**onlooker** · 02-05-07, 02:21 PM

I dont see anyone else being out, besides Boozer. But they can play without him.

Im on the Jazz tonight -1.5. Im not sure what drove the line from 3 to 1.5 so fast, but it was down to 1.5 like right after the books open this morning. Might just of been a adjustment.

Bulls have been doing well on their westcoast trip so far, going 2-1. Granted the two wins are against the Sonics and Blazers. This is their 4th game of a 7 game westcoast trip. I feel the road trip gets to them tonight in Utah.

**Razz** · 02-05-07, 02:23 PM

I think the line is low because there is an expectation that the Jazz will be flat after the two wins they just had.

**onlooker** · 02-05-07, 02:36 PM

Hey P2M. If your going to bet the Jazz, better get it now. I see most of Vegas moved to 2, and the offshore books are starting to move.

Just a heads up.

**onlooker** · 02-05-07, 05:04 PM

Starting to move up again. Im seeing 2.5's pop up.

If you guys liked the Jazz, I hope you jumped on them earlier.

**bigboydan** · 02-05-07, 06:20 PM

I'm going to pass on the side, and play the under in this game.

**onlooker** · 02-05-07, 06:23 PM

Well its back up to the opening line in some places. I see SB.com has it back at -3.

**AC1318** · 02-05-07, 06:50 PM

I like the bulls
chicago is 4-1 as a dog vs utah

**onlooker** · 02-05-07, 06:56 PM

Originally posted by AC1318

I like the bulls
chicago is 4-1 as a dog vs utah

I hope after tonight, that goes to 4-2.

Hope you lose this one AC.

**AC1318** · 02-05-07, 07:53 PM

Originally posted by onlòóker

I hope after tonight, that goes to 4-2.

Hope you lose this one AC.

THANKS

**doc** · 02-05-07, 08:35 PM

Originally posted by AC1318

I like the bulls
chicago is 4-1 as a dog vs utah

How does putting stock into angles like this usually work for ya?

Just curious... I always write them off but I am on the Jazz tonight so if they will lose I will know it was because of this!

**gummo** · 02-05-07, 08:46 PM

Originally posted by bigboydan

I'm going to pass on the side, and play the under in this game.

Under sounds like the play here.

**doc** · 02-05-07, 09:04 PM

Under is a sharp angle with no Boozer the complexion completely changes for Utah. But I suck with totals.

**onlooker** · 02-05-07, 11:37 PM

Sorry AC, but I happy to say that trend is now 4-2.

Congratulations Jazz backers.

**AC1318** · 02-06-07, 09:14 AM

Originally posted by doc

How does putting stock into angles like this usually work for ya?

Just curious... I always write them off but I am on the Jazz tonight so if they will lose I will know it was because of this!

No one claimed to be putting stock into angles like this for this reason of 4-1 as dog I was simply stating a fact of chicago being 4-1 now 4-2 as a dog in the last 10 aside from that chicago was actually somewhere around 7-3 vs utah and although utah had beat two quality teams past two games now 3 quality teams past 3 I thought chicago was overvalued at +3 maybe because the past 2 wins they had were over shit teams, also boozer out again although AK is filling the gap by average to good play I liked chicago and thought they would pull it off outright the positive 2 was insurance lucky for me I took them and sac -5 which split my straights but connected on teaser. But thanks for your concern ,would you like to take my action , just kidding I wouldn't want to take all your loot.

**AC1318** · 02-06-07, 09:14 AM

Originally posted by doc

Under is a sharp angle with no Boozer the complexion completely changes for Utah. But I suck with totals.

by a half point

**AC1318** · 02-06-07, 09:16 AM

Originally posted by onlòóker

Sorry AC, but I happy to say that trend is now 4-2.

Congratulations Jazz backers.

some win some lose
this is why books win
I take one side you the other books the vig
just happy sacramento covered
I never mind spliting 0-2 would not be acceptable